Stingray

let's go!!!!

Good line-up! Let's eat them alive!

Let's do this, Blues! I am going to keep predicting big wins as before, because it seems to pay off! 1-5 Chelsea! Hazard Hattrick!

Oh, you're leaving China in a few months, Kerry? Are you going back to the states? YES!!!! I am headed back to Memphis! My husband has been promoted and that means he needs to go back to corporate. We will stay until Nathan goes to Tanzania on his Global Classroom trip and MacKenzie has competed in the tournament in Bangkok and finished the school play. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD Aha! The Memphis Belle is back in town then

Delete your quote then, mister.

Guess who started it....

Thank you for the update Mr. Obvious... It will get better once we get close to the game, I reckon ! I will personally see to it!

Omg his estrogen levels are OVER 9000 !!!!! FSW STYLE!

Yeaaaah !

Then ban the f"cking idiots, don't make assumptions for a whole nation or do not adress them in a rude way. Give penalty to those being racist, no post or whatever your rules are. "they started this" is not an acceptable line. Mate, it was only banter and the trolling of other trolls (in a reaction to their continuous provocation). Nothing serious nor racist meant. If they post normal, then there is only normal reactions, now the reactions were absurd, not racist. Get a grip. What do you think when we get called belgian waffles? What is the difference with a kebab joke - and it was clearly a joke (and not derogating an 'entire nation' - i never said you were all kebab eating **** or whatever), otherwise it would not have been with funny gifs. Lighten up. Or is it only fun when you guys post and it is racism when we reply?

ManU

This is a serious topic. Especially to me. The last page or two have been ridiculous. I respect that. My arguments however were very, very serious and I understood where you are coming from, David. Myself, I have been active on that topic for very long. Both in organisations for sexual education (including television) as in the direction of the belgian anti-hiv organisation. So I hope your claim isn't directed towards me, actually. If anything, i adressed the error in those kind of claims - claims you hear all too often. Peace!

Excuse me? Can you be a bit more precise?

</blockquote>Blimey .......

Slow build up more likely. The NT uses Rom very much in the wrong way - if at all. Romelu wasnt used really this WC campaign. Most of his appearances date from when he was even younger. Even then, with Leekens as coach, we sucked playing indeed defensive boring shitball. Also Nico Claessen is hardly a legend, Swa Vanderelst a bit more but none if those guys even have made it as a manager. Just opinions from guys who might just be a bit bitter/jealous about the new genereation tbh.

Lol! It does seem so :-)

Here above the original statement Also : my claim: Deriving 'ought' from 'is' = naturalistic fallacy in philosophy You use 'it is just nature' ergo if gay is allowed so is Eva = fallacy for your argument On Wiki just to keep it simple: In philosophical ethics, the term "naturalistic fallacy" was introduced by British philosopher G. E. Moore in his 1903 book Principia Ethica.[1] Moore argues it would be fallacious to explain that which is good reductively, in terms of natural properties. The naturalistic fallacy is closely related to the fallacious appeal to nature, the claim that what is natural is inherently good or right, and that what is unnatural is inherently bad or wrong. Furthermore, Moore's naturalistic fallacy is closely related to the is/ought problem, which comes from Hume's Treatise. Indeed: philosophy 101

If i didn't get your incredible humor infusion, it is more likely to do with English not being my native language. I am sure you would get my jokes just fine when I speak Dutch, French, German or even Latin. You argument fails, because you keep switching topics every time you get a rebuttal. I say to you something very, very simple: your argument is a prime example of the naturalistic fallacy, a common know debating fallacy since David Hume. Look it up before accusing me from being simple minded, ow controversial one.

^ Will Could have Ok then, so come Saturday at the KC stadium Eva Carneiro (the same sexual orientation as a gay man) will be lathering up with the team 'if she wants'. Sorted, done, next topic. If we're changing the culture & customs of football it has to be done without double standards. Right ..... Never mind.

Yes, It was a reply because you made inferences about urges gay guys will have, lmao. Also: you conveniently didnt reply to all the rest. Actually, yes: if neither party sees it as sexual: what is wrong with it. We have mixed sauna's here. Plenty of societies people run around butt naked. We have mixed showers in public places. Some countries like to shit mixed next to each other (sorry to any chinese readers) It is about culture and customs, nothing more. What is so strange about it, Term?

- My argument was based on the premise that homosexuality is biological, something in which science is slowly proving. - How would you know that it wouldn't bring on urges for the gay guy?, it's not something that can be categorically ruled out like it can with a shower full of straight guys. - If a gay man is open about his preference.. then that changes the WHOLE dynamic of that locker room, and that's just the reality. Lol!!! I am not even going in on that argument Term, it is the naturalistic fallacy. Biological means nothing in this debate: you are talking morals here, remember. I know it is biological, where have I said anything that even comes close to this topic. Urges: so is that what you fear? The gay man might have an urge? To do what exactly? Lol! This sounds more funny than serious tbh. If he is open: yes, if YOU make it sexual. That is what I was implying, really. It is only a problem if you see it as sexual. It sounds like your fear of the Gay Dong is much more the problem than philosophy 101 ! Must read: it will make the menace of Schlong Invasion go away http://prospect.org/article/are-gay-guys-checking-you-out-locker-room

Wow diving redefined .... http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hqRZ_ASQ5Z0

kevin has gotten a lot of chances and he was terrible in every game. beside this seems to lack the mentality as Mou said. Schürrle seems to fight and try to gain his place while KDB is just crying that is not getting used. his performance in the Cup against Sunderland was disgusting. he didnt even try to show something or to impress the coach. clearly already out of London in his mind. Define a 'lot' please? Also, KDB has done everything BUT cry. Where did you hear that btw?

The difference is he has gotten a real chance, Kevin hasn't really ...

There are instances, cultures where nudity does not automatically mean sexuality. Try indiginous people (eg. Yanomamo indians in the amazon). Also, the entire nudism movement is based on being exempt from sexuality. Try walking around a nudist beach with a boner for instance. Or sauna's, or .... Fill it in :-) examples galore of a decoupling of nudity and sexuality. In other era's (victorian) sexuality was so repressed even the sight of a naked ankle would put a man through a testosterone rush. So it is really dependant on the context. Also, the Eva argument is flawed imo. The one objecting would be Eva (women being objectified sexually much more then man throughout history), so in that sense the objecting in your analogy would be coming from the gay guy, right? Why would he do that if it is not sexual for him? Do you think gay sporters in a fitness club, football club, or wherever run around with hard-ons? I would with Eva though ...