Blue In Green

We are getting decent free kick opportunities, but it doesn't really matter at this point. Just a short break before the next Man U siege...

As for our tactics, we need to keep the ball for more than five seconds before we can worry about what on Earth we are going to do with it.

Carlo wearing all black...how appropriate. The man is probably attending his own Chelsea funeral...

And we get a corner, and it's tipped away, and it really doesn't matter at this point because the players decided to show up after the pressure was off...utterly heartless.

They could have taken the pitch, at least...

That's that, then.

Alright, better, need to find at least three other gears though.

Five more minutes like this and the match will be put to bed...

This is the toughest question to answer in modern football: Build a new stadium, which could ultimately put Chelsea on the world stage permanently and sell the soul and only home of the club or stay at the Bridge and run the risk of being Liverpool, who struggle to keep up with the ascendancy of their peers? Personally, I don't think the club can grow in a healthy manner if you dig up its roots. I've heard stories of how long-time Arse fans are disappointed with the Emirates and the soulless atmosphere there. That stadium promised to bring revenue and sustained success. What have Arse accomplished since they started playing at the Emirates? In a little over a year, West Ham are about to move into a stadium they have no hope of ever filling. They will be a Championship club peddling £1 tickets to watch a club with a jaded fan base and a track around their pitch, not to mention their debt which threatens to sink them further. Besides, don't the Pitch Owners have a thing that would force Chelsea to change their name if they ever left the Bridge? We might as well be MK Dons if that happened, plastic pariahs of the game. I am an American and I watch professional sports teams leave their communities often; one basketball team threatened to leave Sacramento, California to be the third team in the Los Angeles area. They wanted to change their name when they got there. If Chelsea does that, we might as well call it what it would be: Chelsea Football Franchise. As it stands, Chelsea is not a franchise, and it will never be a franchise. It is too important to too many people for that to ever happen. I don't like the idea of moving. Stamford Bridge is home; hell, it's the only home we've ever had. Arse thought the grass was greener on the other side and look at what they lost on the way there...

:woo:

We have more pressing needs at the moment. Besides, we spent £50m on Torres in January. (It would be a nice luxury, though.)

A Chelsea supporter from the USA that is looking forward to the banter, the highs and the...highs, because I doubt anyone looks forward to the lows. So onwards and upwards, etc. One man went to mow, went to mow a meadow...