Never compare us to City in the market, just don't do it, we bought more players, and a lot of squad players, but they spent truck loads. We already had Gudionsen, Hasselbaink, Gallas, Terry, Lampard, Gronkjaer, Cudicini, Terry. Not to mention we still had a good squad before we got the money, City didn't, City used to lose twice win once, and where a midtable team. You need to understand they hardly had anyone pre there time, even now, we still have two players from then and that's Lamps and Terry. They signed Adebayor, Tevez, Balotelli all for 25 million, Dzeko was 31 million, 27 but 31 when it comes to bonus's, 38.5 million for Aguero, even that striker they got from Blackburn i think it was he was 22 million wasn't he?, fuck sake i can't remember his name. He was either 22 mill or 19 mill. And Robinho for 35 million, then Nasri and Silva for 25 million each. Yaya Toure 28 million, i have to give them huge credit however when it comes down to there back five as they haven't really spend anything on it, besides Lescott who was 24 million which was a complete rip off. Also Milner was 26 million, Barry was 13 million (might be worth it though). They got AJ for 5 million they had Boro's eyes for that. But still look at our big signings, yeah Sheva and Torres shocking prices and never delivered, Drogba 25 million, Luiz 22 million or 21 Essien i actually don't even know the full on price i'm pretty sure its 27 million, but then i keep hearing its 31 million or 24 million. I get confused on that one. But yeah besides that we have been spending on a 13-20 million casually, but our problem is we've spent a lot on that. But when you total up Cities and Chelseas, and i have it comes down to City almost on Chelseas, im sure they are only 70 million behind, which is pretty shocking when you compare how long the owners have been owning us and city, we have had our club for like 4 years longer.