Henrique

Baines should play with this shirt. More 70s than that, impossible,

This guy is huge.

WTF??

Did Hazard played a part in that goal?

Wow, good news!!!

Nice game to enjoy. After some minutes the team started to look solid, but Moses should come in the 2nd half if Hazard doesnt imoprove his poor 1st half.

What a goal, nice Ramires assist. Lampard legend!!!

Torres almost dont get the ballm and when he is suposed to, he is in off side.

What is Hazard doing? Not time for a shoot at all.

You are also wrong, Moses-Marin is the perfect partnership.

Cech; Azi, Iva, Cahill, Cole; Mikel, Luiz, Ramires, Mata, Hazard; Torres.

http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/12084-24-gary-cahill/page-36#entry572864

8 Reasons Not to Sign Gary Cahill http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1012915-chelsea-transfer-rumors-eight-reasons-not-to-sign-gary-cahill Signing Cahill would be an indictment on David Luiz's inability to string consistent performances, but why is André Villas-Boas replacing inconsistency with ineptitude? This article will outline eight reasons why signing Cahill is a big mistake. 1- Gary Cahill Leading Bolton Wanderers to Relegation 2- Gary Cahill's Proficiency at Playing the Offside Trap 3- Gary Cahill Is a Weak Tackler 4- Gary Cahill's Poor Passing Ability 5- Gary Cahill Is Overrated Pros Strong aerially—averages 3.3 aerial duels won per game (third highest among centre-backs). Cons Worse than David Luiz.Weak tackler. Poor passer. Constantly caught out of position.Questionable leader. In bad form. Can sign him for free in six months' time. Taking advantage of Chelsea's weak stance against high wages. Will continue André Villas-Boas' doomed high line strategy. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Great article, it seems the guy knew a lot of stuff about Cahill before he joined Chelsea, because he describe the same problems we have here, there are some interesting stats as well.

You mean, he has got to clean JT's boots and shoes before he can even think about the captaincy, right? Its just some kind of anagram, oh Alex, I got you!!!

Perhaps I'm funny, but I think we should have more english players like Lampard, Terry and Joe Cole, so avarage players like Cahill dont get overrated. Cahill is like Huth. Take your time to read this, you will have lots of fun, but at least you will realize the same things I say about Cahill right now, are almost the same things this guy was saying about him almost one year ago when he still was a Bolton defender: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1012915-chelsea-transfer-rumors-eight-reasons-not-to-sign-gary-cahillhttp://bleacherreport.com/articles/1012915-chelsea-transfer-rumors-eight-reasons-not-to-sign-gary-cahill

It seems you dont know that much about Luiz. João Paulo, his coach at that time, realized he was strugling to play with his back to the opponent, because he was still growing up. Yeah, he was 17 years old. So I dont know why you are talking about this, because right now he is 25 years old.

For the record Cahill is by far the worst CB since Boulahourz, but the dutch could play also as a full back, so he was more useful. Luiz as a CB play really good the big games, while Cahill used to fuck everythig in the big games. I'm happy both RDM and Benitez realiazed it, since Cahill is always the last option for that position.

The original Budweiser was made in Czech, in Budweise. I dont know why the guy who created the american Budweiser decided to use the same name, but one reason was his beer was similar to the one made in Europe. In fact this 2 brothers thing is not true at all, and both have different recipe, the american one in fact is a American Lager, and the original Budweiser is a Pilsen. The american Budweiser has rice and corn in its recipe. Why? Because they are mass production beers, and almost all mass production beers have adjuncts like corn and rice, you know they are cheap so it means more money. Just put some low quality beers in the market, and the the adds will do the job. In Brazil they created a "brazilian way of drinking beer": it must be REALLY cold, guess why? Because when they are in very low temperatures, you just cant feel the flavor at all, but as soon as the temperature starts to get higher the beer starts to taste like junk. You are from England, you have a lot of good beers around. Do yourself a favor: never drink an american Budweiser anymore. lol

Actually Budweiser is the official WC beer, in the stadiuns there would only be Budweiser beers.

WTF? The best place for discussion about belgian beer is in Lukaku topic. Lukaku = Beer.

lol You should know more about brazilian beer, some of the best beers in the world are produced right here, like Demoiselle and Indica from Colorado. Baden Baden has some quality beers, like Red Ale, Backer has "Tres Lobos" beers, that are inspired by the american Flying Dog, and there still Rasen, Bierland, Eisebhan and many others that produce high quality beers. So it seems you are the one that dont rate your country as you should.

Calm down dude, some of the best beers in the world are made in USA, I'm talking about beers like Budweiser, so be cool.

Well, we can find all these beers here, but not in avarage pubs, but there many places that sell imported beers and special brazilian beers. They are far from cheap here, but belgian beers are really loved. People who like avarage beers go for Heineken and Stella, and people who really care about the subject also get the special belgian beers. I will put the ones you mentioned on my wishlist, but LaChouffe is the only one I never heard about.

Well, I dont believe Benitez is the best manager in the world, but when he was hired I really believe that he was better than RDM, and one of most stupid things people were saying was that RDM was the right man, not because he is a legend and gave Chelsea a UCL, but because he was really good, and Benitez was way worst than the italian. Well, in few games we can see that the team is way more solid than in Robbie's days. People were complaining RDM was attacking minded (even if he "gave" Chelsea a UCL parking the bus in 3 games) while Benitez was a defensive coach, and then he came with a 8-0 win. In RDM days there was a feelling that team lacked options, in fact he was always using the same formation: Mikel, Ramires (Lampard),Oscar, Hazard, Moses, Torres. Benitez introduced Moses as a really important player, he is not just a squad player that is starting games when the rest are tired, and now even Luiz is playing as mid, and sometimes we have players like Lampard, Ramires, Hazard and Oscar on the bench. Torres used to get the blame for the lack of goals, but we scored 8 goals against Aston Villa and Torres got only one. While we still need more striker, now it seems that we dont need a huge new name like Falcao to "save" the rest of the season. During Mourinhos first 2 season, Lampard was the top scored, and Chelsea did not have a goal scorer like Nilsterooy or Henry, but we still managed to scored a lot o goals. Torres is not there to scored? OK, we still have Hazard, Mata, Moses, Luiz... People will get angry, but I this is what I believe: - If Benitez was hired when AVB was sacked, probably we would never get that UCL trophy. RDM was the right man for that moment. - If Benietz was hired in the summer we probably would be in UCL knockout stage, and on pair with MU in PL race title, not with a 11 (8) pointss gap.

This was the same thing they were saying about Santos when they were destroying the weaker sides like Guarani with 8-0 victories. How many teams in the world that destroy their opponents with such result?