Pacquiao

so does this confirm you have no comeback from the ratings i showed you? because those links you posted dont answer anything! you are learning well from your mentor zolayes, when your getting owned try and change the subject or just run away, #Owned

there is no reply! LOL so yes as you can see from all the ratings Matic was clearly MOTM in both games right? This proves how delusional you are! and as for the rest of your embarrassing post, i have no intention of replying to such BS and i would rather stay on topic as this is the Matic thread. So how about you man up and admit it then that Matic clearly wasnt MOTM in those game, or are you going to continue being a spineless child who must be used to getting owned by now.

LOL put Remy up front or how about Aguero or Suarez or Lewandowski or Ibra or Benzema, it wont make a difference, the way we are playing doesnt help a striker at all, no striker on the planet would be prolific in our current team, we dont create chances, we just steal a goal from a set piece or a mistake, then sit back and hope for the best, Remy would be our worst option to have up front right now, at least with Costa he has been able to put in some top performances against West Brom, Porto and Villa during this bad spell.

those stats are meaningless how exactly??? as didierforever said 'a striker's link up play, hold up play, positioning, general contribution should even be looked at'

Hmm lets see shall we Man City v Chelsea Whoscored.com gave Fabregas a 7.7 the highest of any Chelsea player. Daily Mail gave Matic a 5.5 out of 10 only Ivanovic was rated lower. Goal.com gave Matic 2.5 out of 5, Azpilicueta and Hazard were both rated higher. Squawka gave Matic 3 out of 5, Hazard and Fabregas were both rated higher Chelsea v Crystal Palace whoscored.com gave Pedro a 7.9 the highest of any Chelsea player Daily Mail gave Matic 5 out of 10, Pedro, Zouma, Hazard and Willian were all rated higher Independent gave Matic 5 out of 10 the joint lowest of all the Chelsea players Mirror gave Matic 5 out of 10. Azpilicueta, Pedro and Costa were all rated higher. Squawka gave Pedro 4.5 out of 5 and a score of 47 the highest of any Chelsea player I could go on but its looking very embarrassing for you, just man up and admit it that Matic clearly wasnt MOTM in those games.

I called you out before on your stupid statement saying Matic was MOTM against Man CIty and Crystal Palace! Costa is the 2nd best striker in the world! he has proved that over the last 3 or 4 seasons, if you think any other top striker would thrive in our current team with the way we are playing then it shows how little you know. Oscar playing poor??? he was good yesterday, i dont know what game you watched, he has got over his injury problems now it seems, and is getting back to his best even though he has been playing out of position! This shows how narrow minded you are and how you can only see what is in front of you, you dont think outside the box, you dont take into account things like the team not functioning properly, players playing out of position, injuries, lack of cohesion in attack, attacking players being asked to defend more this season, lack of confidence in the team, lack of balance in the team, none of that stuff comes into your thinking, when you see even the best player in the league Eden Hazard struggling to perform in this team that should tell you something isnt right, but let me guess you think we are playing poor because most of our players just turned into bad players overnight right?

so @zolayes can you confirm this is the third time you have run away from explaining this?

Matic wasnt poor, dont know what game you were watching, he just isnt anywhere near his level from last season, but remember he was MOTM against Man City.

i think its all in your head to be honest, and if Lukaku played for us right now i would have sympathy for him as we are not functioning in attack at all this season, and what meaningless stats did i use for Costa??? i would love to know.

yes his awful season is continuing because he still isnt near the level he was last season! and you are very mistaken if you think i dont like Matic and Willian, I like both, but i speak the truth Matic has been awful this season, and i dont even know why you are mentioning Willian i have had nothing but good things to say about him, he is easily our POTY so far and i would be very happy for him if he gets it. you on the other hand have your favorites but with you your favorites dont play for us! if i make a comment about Sterling you will use Hazard as an example in a negative way to suit your argument, if i make a comment about De Bruyne you will use Oscar or Hazard as an example in a negative way to suit your argument, if i make a comment about Lukaku you will use Costa as an example in a negative way to suit your argument, something i find very weird.

if you could read you would see i said he is no where near the level he was last season, and if i have favorites at least mine play for Chelsea! unlike yours.

Looked good when he came on, very impressed with his attitude, after being benched.

and there you go again putting words in peoples mouths as usual! no one said a striker can only be poor if they miss an open goal! why would you even think that??? Costa had 85% pass accuracy only Baba had higher, he made 3 key passes only Oscar had more, he completed 4 dribbles only Willian completed more, he won 2 free-kicks and contributed defensively making 1 tackle, blocking 1 shot and making 1 clearance, all while playing in a team that is not functioning well right now, when you take all that into account and the lack of service yes its clear he was awful right?

no Costa was terrible today, he missed 3 open goals and 5 easy chances put on a plate for him, if he was not on the pitch we would have won 10-0

your reply says it all

i wont even bother when the inevitable happens, when we start functioning as a team again, and the goals start flowing for Costa, i am not obsessed with them llke they are with me

shows how little you know about how bad the team are playing and how that affects the striker!

no you didnt! your exact quote was. so please explain what you mean by 'Your stars' are you not a Chelsea fan? yet you refer to Chelsea players as 'Your stars' as if you dont want to be associated with them!

he doesnt understand football very well, he still thinks Matic was MOTM against Man City!

random stats???? LOOL those were his stats from the match so please explain how they are random??? and please explain what Choulo proved??? he got owned after saying Costa hasnt won a header all season i proved he did, end of debate! so your gonna have to try harder then that old man.

no he wasnt awful! he is a striker playing in team that cant function in attack! he constantly has to drift out wide just to get a touch of the ball! he would be awful if he missed 4 or 5 easy chances, but fact is he feeds off scraps!

you do know Oscar is not a winger right? but remember Matic was MotM against Crystal Palace!

oh the irony! so is the third time your not going to explain the comment you made?

Costa - 4 keys passes, 85% Pass completion, 4 Dribbles completed, 2 Free-Kicks won and a 7.35 rating (4th highest) And the same 3 who are obsessed with me are in here oh dear!

Chelsea get a much needed win and your in the Costa thread after a game where the service to him was poor again! forced to drift out wide to get a touch of the ball! says a lot about you and your obsession really! I am still waiting for you to explain your comments when you called the Chelsea players 'Your stars' i called you out on it twice and you ran away this is the third time lets see if you can explain it...