I don't particular like ifs and buts, but if ( ) we had went 5 at the back like we wanted to with 5 mins remaining with JT on, do you think we would have been as unorganised and unable to deal with the long ball... Obviously we have no way of answering that, but we would have had a huge arial prescense with jt ivan cahill and ba and JT is one of the best at organising and dictating where people should be etc... I don't know they may still have scored but what is the point of not putting him on? Are you telling me that Terry is not more beneficial than oscar in the last 3 mins of the game... Obviously he is, so why not just chuck him on with BA? Could he not be assed, or does he earn a bonus for not using all of his allotted 3 possible substituitions.