Mário César

what player will be cucu backup?

the profit that we made and will do from this sales is so small that is so sad that we are wasting money with this kids and sell them from slightly above amounts that we brough him

we bought angelo (who has already been sold), casadei, chuka (from villa), veiga and now we'regoing to sell them all just shows that we're buying for the sake of buying. what a pointless thing to do

we all already know how the board thinks. there's no point in dwelling on it. they want new players, to grow. if renato leaves, we need another player for the position

we paid 15M for him. I think the amount that we demanded is ok

As expected

im tired of this board.. I dont care anymore, tbh so random decisions that tired my mental health

As expected

yes and probably we will not match his wages desires

too good to be true

Kvra would upgrade a lot our attack and with mudryk suspense makes sense. but yeah we have more urgent issues to fix

And we sold connor for this? Shambolic decision

without a doubt until recently we were the best attack in the league an addition to mudryk makes perfect sense if he's suspended, but that's it. apart from that, we need a central defender, which is the most important thing, to stabilize the defence. everything started to fall apart with the injuries to fofana and lavia. it's no coincidence

if top5 is enough for ucl, I think we will be fine

thats my opinion also if we lose mudryk, maybe we need another player, but the most important thing is fix our defense issues

First we need to buy a center back

I think there is some slight improvement, but not too much to be happy for sack poch and bet in maresca

well if we sold renato, we need to buy some defenders

during poch's time the team had difficulties in midfield because enzo doesn't have the physical size that lavia has. the problem is that lavia is often injured and that makes it difficult to play well in midfield. the first half against fulham, ipwich and palace was good. the team hasn't been as effective and has also had problems in defense.

the problem is that unlike in some games we haven't managed to take a two-goal lead or kill the game off early. that's the only difference because we've conceded late goals like against brentford, tottenham and leicester, for example. the difference is that at 1-0 the team has found it harder to hold on to the lead. fofana's absence and lavia's absence have cost us these points. i have an idea that, with them, we wouldn't have lost so badly. lavia gave the midfield another physical dimension. something that isn't happening now.

Chelsea have shown some good things, even in the last few games. the problem is the lack of intensity and perhaps an excess of rigidity from maresca and individual errors

Chelsea didn't play a bad game. just like against ipswich and even better than that, to be honest. the problem was the individual errors and the lack of ability to kill the game off. the attacking players lacked goals. the midfield without lavia is easily swallowed up and, as we don't kill the game off, we're at the mercy of what's happened so far. the squad is good, but with players like fofana, reece and lavia always injured, it gets complicated. i liked joshua's debut. on the other hand, gusto's regression is worrying

Chelsea didn't play a bad game. just like against ipswich and even better than that, to be honest. the problem was the individual errors and the lack of ability to kill the game off. the attacking players lacked goals. the midfield without lavia is easily swallowed up and, as we don't kill the game off, we're at the mercy of what's happened so far. the squad is good, but with players like fofana, reece and lavia always injured, it gets complicated. i liked joshua's debut. on the other hand, gusto's regression is worrying

yes like gallagher was sold

we need a center back and a striker at least until the end of the season and sell disasi