Zdar

Yep, and actually you probably learn more by training all the week with players like Thiago Silva and Thiago Motta, than by playing Stoke City.
Edit: FFP? lol. Step by step then; first step for PSG would be to pay, a ridiculous amount for the owners.
Qatar bought the WC dude, Platini's son works at QSI.

Yep, and actually you probably learn more by training all the week with players like Thiago Silva and Thiago Motta, than by playing Stoke City.
Edit: FFP? lol. Step by step then; first step for PSG would be to pay, a ridiculous amount for the owners.
Qatar bought the WC dude, Platini's son works at QSI.

Motta was injured all the time last season, thats why we found our 3 men midfield only this year.
He doesnt seem unhappy, dont forget he's on the wing with Uruguay too. He often said he likes to do big efforts for th team.
Fluctuat explained his role very well, nothing left to say about him.
Imo this tweet clash lacks class, but yeah it's funny.
Seems like half of France will support Chelsea and half of England will support PSG. Inferiority complex toward the capital, hate toward money, hooligan troubles on the past, see how our clubs are similar, Chelsea just started its reborn 10 years earlier

Yep, and actually you probably learn more by training all the week with players like Thiago Silva and Thiago Motta, than by playing Stoke City.
Edit: FFP? lol. Step by step then; first step for PSG would be to pay, a ridiculous amount for the owners.
Qatar bought the WC dude, Platini's son works at QSI.

Come on now... At least say Everton!

You are mixing different things.Whenever you speak about a good player of PSG, you keep saying it is a disgrace and they lack ambition. So tell me, was Makelele ambitious for you leaving Real for you at this point.
Of course, after some years, Chelsea won trophies and players were proven right to come at Chelsea. A decade ago, Chelsea was just facing the one you are doing towards PSG. I wonder if you truly love Chelsea and know its history.
About the whole Germany thing, i can remember that two or three years ago, nobody was saying it was a top league but after last year UCL achievement, it is the opposite. I think it is a nice league to watch with a lot of goals but except bayern and a fullyfit bvb, other teams are average.
And yes, the biggest weakness is to be a french club: lot of taxes,equally distributed tv incomes...
French league was maybe the most fair league in the last decades and that ce cost was the loss of competitivness.
The only difference between Psg and Chelsea moneywise is that you could outspend during 10 years while we are doing it within 3 years. Let us more time and we will generate a lot like the way you establish yourself.

Even for us, it's hard to judge them. They've won the League since the 1rst day, their only motivation is CL. That's why it's not relevant, imo, to speak about the games against Monaco; PSG didn't have to beat Monaco to be sure to win the League. Our only reference is the 2nde leg against Barça (considering the quarter was our aim last year, Ancelotti was probably forced to put Beckham for the first leg, for marketing). A weak Barça without Messi. So we're in the unknown here too.
Anyone knows Chelsea is very good at counter attacking; this is CL and I think that before scoring, PSG will make sure to be well organized and to get a clean sheet. Paris can score at SB as well.
PSG is the best team on set pieces in the CL this year (7 goals if i'm not wrong); both team are physical; there should be some interesting duel situations.
"We reached the CL before Roman came. "
So did Paris, but this isn't the subject anymore mate.

"LOL your club is bragging about two Quarterfinal berths... hahahaha at Chelsea that is viewed a disappointment not an accomplishment"
"PSG here, there & everywhere. Before 2012 PSG was nowhere, never won any major trophy, decent players were leaving for greener pastures... Suddenly, Mr. Money came by and PSG started to be known."
Crazy to read stuffs like that here on a CHELSEA forum, do you guys know your own club history? Paris was bad in the 2000's, Colony Capital didn't put enough money and yes great players like Ronnie had to leave, but was strong in the 90's, UEFA #1 in 1998, not so bad right? Before Abramovitch, the 2 clubs had similar achievements, except that Chelsea is 65 y.o older...
PSG will be fine with a 0-0, the players know they can score at the Bridge so they're willing for a clean sheet in Paris.
Edit: Anyway, seems like we're done with this debate.
Fulham Broadway, thanks. You're right, Mourinho scares me. But players are more important. Chelsea will have to be very very realistic to score so much while preventing PSG to score. Ofcourse, realism means everything in CL, and we all know any team has good and bad days. Trust me, in a good day, PSG is able to totally destroy Chelsea on the first leg. If they have to score several goals at the Bridge, PSG will have more opportunities.
Forgive my english.

Hey fellows.
A little stat:
PSG 9 last games; 9 win, 27 goal scored, 0 conceded.
Anyway, what I find funny about this draw, is all the links we can do between these clubs; TS VS Luiz, Oscar VS Lucas, Maxwell, Ramires, Alex playing his former club, anyway many brazilians, Hazard, Ba and Eto'o are PSG fans, Mourinho knows and respects Blanc from ManU, Thiago Motta and Ibra from Inter ... Some kind of fratricidal war right
It may be the most interesting draw in this quarters. If Blues don't score in Paris, it will be difficult for them.

"LOL your club is bragging about two Quarterfinal berths... hahahaha at Chelsea that is viewed a disappointment not an accomplishment"
"PSG here, there & everywhere. Before 2012 PSG was nowhere, never won any major trophy, decent players were leaving for greener pastures... Suddenly, Mr. Money came by and PSG started to be known."
Crazy to read stuffs like that here on a CHELSEA forum, do you guys know your own club history? Paris was bad in the 2000's, Colony Capital didn't put enough money and yes great players like Ronnie had to leave, but was strong in the 90's, UEFA #1 in 1998, not so bad right? Before Abramovitch, the 2 clubs had similar achievements, except that Chelsea is 65 y.o older...
PSG will be fine with a 0-0, the players know they can score at the Bridge so they're willing for a clean sheet in Paris.
Edit: Anyway, seems like we're done with this debate.
Fulham Broadway, thanks. You're right, Mourinho scares me. But players are more important. Chelsea will have to be very very realistic to score so much while preventing PSG to score. Ofcourse, realism means everything in CL, and we all know any team has good and bad days. Trust me, in a good day, PSG is able to totally destroy Chelsea on the first leg. If they have to score several goals at the Bridge, PSG will have more opportunities.
Forgive my english.