Hazardous Oscar

I hope you will get highest grades in those subjects....prepare well...

this is incredibly funny....you joined this forum a day later than me just to respond me, and now you are making up stories about me....prove that I said that Abramovich would hire Klopp... a troll is caught in trolling...

I am 31 years old and have a master degree in international finance. I have been watching football since 1986 world cup in Mexico when I was just 4 years old. Since then I have watched all major national tournaments and since 1991 have been following all European club competitions. Of course, the teen's analyses might be liked by educated ones as well....that's certainly not exactly what I meant....but I am sure that most of those who like it are people who don't have a good grasp of football.....you know how it happens, show the masses complicated (for them) charts, schemes and pics, and they will follow you simply because they will think that there is some truth hidden in them....

What is an insult?....calling a kid or sonny someone who is 15 years younger than you?.....thanks for making me laugh

prove your statement

didn't say that....I know that many fellow Chelsea fans and some others worship Mourinho.

ok...didn't notice that at first

Debate fairly?....I debated fairly enough and proved my point while disproving his....if you didn't like the age part you could just have ignored it.

yep and it was easy like I showed here...

Have nothing to say about rules....will have to respect them. Regarding who is right and wrong, if someone cannot back up his arguments and brings false information, like our teenager did, then he's wrong....plain and simple.

that was not a prediction of what Jose would do

yes, but you know that I am right...

so much naivety and arrogance in this teenager...

yet understanding that is a rocket science for many...

So the Chelsea board who sacked managers in less than a year have no idea about football? Yes, of course. And that is the exact reason why they hired Mourinho back for him to play a certain style which he has never played in his whole career. Thanks for agreeing with me.

Now that you have realized that you have been dealing with someone who has superior knowledge of the game than you, you are trying to mask that fact with some personal issues and run away. Let it be the way you want, sonny. :tophat:

You have all the traits of a classical teenager who thinks that by mentioning names of managers he can show his superiority in knowledge. Do you realize that we live in 21st century and one can find everything on internet? I don't know Ferguson and Bielsa? Yes, you know them because you mentioned them in your long hollow posts. One triangle for a goal? Roman and the board seem to not have a problem with Jose? You mean like they didn't with most of the managers they sacked. And those are your arguments? Please keep insulting yourself. Guardiola has a much better H2H to Jose despite being younger, and his teams always play exciting attacking football. That's the only relevance of him to this topic. And here is the icing on the cake. When Jose was asked of the style which he was supposed to play with this Chelsea side, his response was: "the ideal is to always play in a high block, to recover the ball very very fast, to have the ball to build well, to be always in the control of the game, to be proactive and not reactive." That's how the teams like Borussia Dortmund, Bayern Munich, Barcelona (albeit with different styles of possessional football) play and unlike how Jose's teams of the past played. His words on that in between 3:30 and 4:15 in the following video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZ51HzMSz4Q It seems like you didn't do your homework, sonny.

There are so many mistakes and false information in your posts that I don't even know which one of them to refute.... Jose Mourinho was hired the second time by Roman to play a stylish attacking football, which is different than that he played at the Bridge during his first reign. This is a fact, yet we haven't seen anything of that kind yet. The real problem is we haven't seen anything of that kind from any team Jose managed before. A 50 year old manager is not capable to change his ways, something the Chelsea board ignored and which will come back to bite them. Your examples of Guardiola and Fergie has no relevance to this issue as those managers had control over the transfers, yet Jose doesn't at Chelsea now. Michael Emenalo is responsible of that and it's him who bought all the creative players we have now. That is because Roman Abramovich wants to see attacking football. The way Chelsea created triangles was never ever seen at the Bridge before? You must be kidding, kid. Go find a video of the Tottenham game away under Robbie last fall and watch Mikel-Hazard-Mata triangle combination which led to Mata's goal. Please stop insulting yourself, my son. Writing long hollow posts doesn't do you a favour. Your posts can amaze only uneducated and shallow people.

and that will be wrong, given that Lampard starts..

This is incredibly funny...do you always talk (write) for the sake of talking (writing)?..... Every manager gets rid of players who he thinks are not needed anymore.....Guardiola got rid of Ronaldinho, Eto'o and Deco because those stars have past it, they won almost everything with Rijkaard and Barcelona's academy had young players capable of replacing all of them....this has nothing to do with adopting players to your tactics.....the reality is Guardiola made the best out of Barcelona side which he had at his disposal....one cannot imagine that team of Xavi-Iniesta-Messi and co. playing better football than that....Ferguson chose and bought players who fit his style and that worked.....yet any knowledgable person will tell you that the Chelsea side with the creative talent like Hazard, Oscar, Mata, and co. should play expansive, possessional and attacking football and any manager who tries to make them play in any other way is just misusing the resources he has....plain and simple. You are insulting yourself even though you don't know it....you will get it when you grow up.

if Jose persists on Lampard (which I think he will) then the ideal line-up for this game will be this: -----------------------Cech------------------------ Azpilicueta-----Luiz------Terry------Bertrand ------------------------Mikel------------------------ -----------Lampard----------Ramires------------- Schurrle------------Oscar-------------------Hazard this line-up will dominate the midfield....we can score goals without a striker as we've been doing for most of the games.....if until 60-th minute we still don't score, take off Lamps for Torres and shift Oscar to Lamps' position.....if Schurrle underperforms, take him off for either Mata or Willian....we'll be fine. I know that Jose won't play this line-up but still...

what are you laughing at?

they don't have a better squad than us....with the right line-up we should be beating them...

you misunderstood the whole thing.....hjhsomething's analysis of Mourinho's tactics is not wrong....Mourinho's tactics are very simple to read for anyone who understands a little of how football works....the issue is why Mourinho plays like that.....

I know that Mourinho has much wider view and knowledge on European football than you...that's not the issue....the issue is Jose's inability to adopt his tactics to skills of his players, instead of adopting players' skills to his tactics.