Jump to content

Redevelopment?


noctis
 Share

Recommended Posts

Personally I'd be looking at something like a 56,000-60,000 seater stadium complete with naming rights, although not necessarily as high as £100 Million over ten years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Personally I'd be looking at something like a 56,000-60,000 seater stadium complete with naming rights, although not necessarily as high as £100 Million over ten years.

On a new stadium id be wanting north of 100m over 10 years if I were the club, wengers perennial bottlers get 10m a season for having their stadia named after an airline, and that deal is what 4 years old now, id hazard a guess that for naming rights for a new stadia you could get a bidding war going between a few companys, imho opinion that is the reason renaming the bridge has failed to deliver anything yet a company would be willing to shell out that kind of cash but only for something that is new and has no name already attached to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a new stadium id be wanting north of 100m over 10 years if I were the club, wengers perennial bottlers get 10m a season for having their stadia named after an airline, and that deal is what 4 years old now, id hazard a guess that for naming rights for a new stadia you could get a bidding war going between a few companys, imho opinion that is the reason renaming the bridge has failed to deliver anything yet a company would be willing to shell out that kind of cash but only for something that is new and has no name already attached to it.

But the thing is, didn't that 100m include shirt sponsorship as well? I certainly think we should be looking at Arsenal's business model a bit closer, perhaps with not quite as much emphasis on youth development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the thing is, didn't that 100m include shirt sponsorship as well? I certainly think we should be looking at Arsenal's business model a bit closer, perhaps with not quite as much emphasis on youth development.

Yep it did and it was for 15 years after doing abit of research, their ground will keep the name the emirates till atleast 2021, that deal was done in 2004 though and if you look at the upward trend of football sponsorship (see bayern munich as a great example) since then despite the recession, id say 120m over 10 years would be obtainable on a brand new stadia on one of the most famous clubs in world football, also take into account by the time any new stadium was built/finished (at least 3 years from start to finish) that the economy (globally) may be in better health which would also give the club a better footing in negotiations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just host big EPL games and UCL knockout matches at Twickenham?

Wasn't that was mooted when bates was still in charge whilst the bridge was being redeveloped the last time? certainly wouldn't be a bad idea although im not sure how good the playing surface would be at certain points through the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just host big EPL games and UCL knockout matches at Twickenham?

Interesting point and makes sense but thier would be uproar from other clubs and how much would English Rugby want for the hire of the ground??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...