Jump to content

Bl33D BlUe

Member
  • Posts

    47
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    India

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Bl33D BlUe reacted to lucio in 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Gary Cahill   
    Telling everyone to calm down, as their player is in the act of scoring. Classic cahill
  2. Like
    Bl33D BlUe reacted to Unionjack in 👕 Chelsea Kits Thread   
    With the £60 lill they're going to be paying us I hope they got some nice designs.
  3. Like
    Bl33D BlUe reacted to Essien19 in The Next Manager?   
    Just came back from the gym and then saw this, top class, but i wouldn't expect anything less from you!
    That should put things to bed! Complete destruction!
    Can we vote for post of the month?
  4. Like
    Bl33D BlUe reacted to stroey in The Next Manager?   
    What you're trying to interpret is like I said Jose had 0% power and control but I did not say this, so please don't make up things. I said, in order to succeed you must have full power and control (100%) of the transfers and targets. The world is not black or white, there are things in between. Not able to buy because the lack of money is one thing, but to have money to buy players and getting Djilobodji, Baba and Hector from Emenalo is another thing.
    You're either a sheep that likes attention from the Emenalo cultists (your pic proves that), a Mourinho hater or a person with a very low IQ.
    But your point to say the club spent 300M + on players suggests you're in the latest category too, so I suggest you should go back to school to learn the difference between gross spend and net spend, or maybe try to Google it.
    But OK, I assume you're too lazy for that so I will explain it baby language for you:
    The club spent (net) 52 millions in 5 windows. To compare: Arsenal 106M, City 178M, United 238M, Liverpool 99M.
    So what does it say? It means in order to buy a player that manager wants, he has to sell another player for big value. But does it automatically mean that the manager didn't like the player that has to be sold? No, it means you have to choose between 2 valuable assets/options.
    Nobody on here, can convince me or even themselves that Jose Mourinho didn't like David Luiz. Luiz played all the big games in midfield instead of Mikel, Oscar and Lampard in the second half of the 2013-14 season. So does it mean Jose didn't value him? No it means he had to sell him in order to buy other players that he wanted. Mata played more than Schurrle, KDB wanted to leave and Lukaku wanted a guarantee to be the first striker. He needed to sell these guys to get main targets like Diego, Cesc, Luis and Matic who won us the league.
    But before you're going to say ''yeah but he clearly didn't like Mata, KDB, Luis and Lukaku, that's why the club sold them.'' I'd tell you, even if that was really the case that he didn't like them, and Jose had the 100% power and control of transfers, wouldn't he replace them with other Jose Mourinho type of players to add depth on the bench? Why aren't there any of Khedira, Higuain/Benteke, Sneijder, Callejon, Isco, Raul Garcia, Miranda, Luisao on our bench then?
    But what is the reality? We still have the same bad quality depth, Mikel is still our first back up as CDM, Baba an unproven left back as our first back up. Djilobodji as our 4th center back, Ramires as our only box to box player, no top class striker to compete with Diego and Oscar as a starting player. And that's because the club was not 100% buying the players the manager wanted, and because they were reluctant to spend extra money.
    Which big club in the world would sell your 2 times player of the year to a direct rival, in the middle of the season? Which big club waits 1 year long to get the ideal striker without getting a decent one now? Which big club has such bad bench options like ours? Which big club would ignore the pleads of the manager after winning the league? Which club would strengthen a direct rival with your club legend without strengthening yourself? Which club would be more busy with breaking records of players on loan rather than looking for quality for the first team? Which big club would get 0 first team additions after winning the league? Which club would get Djilobodji and Hector on deadline day to save your season? Which club would finish the deal of your only left footed left back option when the season is already 3 weeks old? Which big club uses a ''1 out first then 1 in'' transfer strategy? Which big club would be more busy with balancing the books than strengthening the squad?
    The above piece summarizes the backing Jose got from the board and the ambition from the club. Yes Jose was not a victim that had 0% power and control but it was clear as day that he did not have 100% power and control. So please let your Cinderella stories rest that he was fully backed by the board in the 2,5 years here.
    And no, this not an excuse for Mourinho to be sitting at 1 point above relegation. The club failed as a collective unit this season, including the players and Jose.
  5. Like
    Bl33D BlUe got a reaction from Essien19 in The Mourinho Thread   
    Damn, I am feeling very sad and gutted, still can't believe that the players which I support from my heart managed to get rid of my favorite and no. 1 manager.
    Yes we were on a free fall but if Jose is punished for this mess then I feel that players are equally responsible and they should at least be punished in some way (pay cut, training with youth, some match bans)
    This season is completely destroyed now and I can't believe how are we gonna win against PSG without Special One, hope we don't get thrashed .
    Damn You Players, Damn You Board and Damn You Mourinho (yes you could have avoided If you had kept quiet) and The BIGGEST FUCK YOU to EVA for starting this mess you have hurt so many Chelsea fans feelings.
    But I am a supporter of CHELSEA FC not Players FC or Mourinho FC so --
    :blue scalf: :blue scalf: :blue scalf: :blue scalf:
  6. Like
    Bl33D BlUe reacted to Ankit in 🇨🇴 Radamel Falcao   
×
×
  • Create New...