TheHulk

Fuck off Kessie, really?

But this Madueke is barely scoring, injury prone and costs us 40M, at first glance it's a colossal waste of money.

Have to admit hurts watching us spend a lot on Madueke and Mudryk, money that could've been used for Enzo.

They also signed Depay on 2 and half years. I think we can get him but at least one of Havertz/Mount need to go.

What the fuck, will Todd and Eghbali play in midfield?

Least Scum didn't win and lost Casemiro against Arsenal.

Hasn't been anywhere near Mount yet his stats aren't far off from him in contributions and ratings in the last 2 seasons. So Mount coming from the academy and being on a free now gives him the right to be among the best earners despite his on field performances being no way near as good as Kante and James? I honestly don't care he is from the academy and cost the club nothing, you shouldn't be given star wages unless you play like a star, Mount aside 2-3 performances he has been nothing more than a squad player for us, albeit a good squad player worth keeping but only for the right wages. My worries is the club gives in to his demands and after we are stuck with him if he doesn't improve. Personally I'd sell both Mount and Havertz and buy Joao on a permanent and give Gallagher, Carney his minutes doubt we gonna see any downgrade in performances.

Of course I choose to ignore, I'm a fucking fan I watch the team and the players how they perform, I don't give a fuck one costed 70M and one nothing if both deliver the same crap/average performances. Why should one get more benefit at being poor than the other based on what they cost when both deliver the same garbage on field.

I did read his post, Havertz does fuck all while Mount pulls tree but the ratings shows they have similar impact during the last 2 seasons. No wonder he won player of the year 2 times in a row if guys like you voted for him.

Trading him for Sterling proved to be a big L.

Again you guys are worshipping Mount when it's pretty obvious he isn't much better than Havertz overall. Havertz 2021 rating PL 7.24 CL 7.42 Mount 2021 rating PL 7.69 CL 7.12 Havertz 2022 rating PL 7.23 CL 7.16 Mount 2022 rating PL 6.69 CL 7.24 They are very close in rating everything included tackles, passes completed, etc. As for Matt Law debunking that number you think 260k is any better? Same shit, again why should Mount receive star wages when he is a squad player? Anything above 150k and 200k with performances is an absolute rip off, it looks like Mason wants to take the club to the cleaners with his demands either way otherwise would've been settled long ago by now.

Mount has 12 more contributions in 15 more appearances since Havertz was signed where is this has done much much more? I honestly don't care comparing them both are bad but one is so far content with 150k and the other, if rumours are to believed wants close to 300k, you figure out why people are angry.