"LOL your club is bragging about two Quarterfinal berths... hahahaha at Chelsea that is viewed a disappointment not an accomplishment" "PSG here, there & everywhere. Before 2012 PSG was nowhere, never won any major trophy, decent players were leaving for greener pastures... Suddenly, Mr. Money came by and PSG started to be known." Crazy to read stuffs like that here on a CHELSEA forum, do you guys know your own club history? Paris was bad in the 2000's, Colony Capital didn't put enough money and yes great players like Ronnie had to leave, but was strong in the 90's, UEFA #1 in 1998, not so bad right? Before Abramovitch, the 2 clubs had similar achievements, except that Chelsea is 65 y.o older... PSG will be fine with a 0-0, the players know they can score at the Bridge so they're willing for a clean sheet in Paris. Edit: Anyway, seems like we're done with this debate. Fulham Broadway, thanks. You're right, Mourinho scares me. But players are more important. Chelsea will have to be very very realistic to score so much while preventing PSG to score. Ofcourse, realism means everything in CL, and we all know any team has good and bad days. Trust me, in a good day, PSG is able to totally destroy Chelsea on the first leg. If they have to score several goals at the Bridge, PSG will have more opportunities. Forgive my english.