RoyalBlues

The deal involving MU for sure has any effect, for their sake themselves. Don't see any point why Verratti from PSG to Barca has any connection with Pogba or Lukaku deal, involving Juve, MU and Everton in the first place. Mind you Everton has accepted the bid, not the player has agreed personal term or something. Yes, he want to leave, but he hasn't tell he will want to join MU yet. What I've wrote is when the player has expressed his desire to move to certain club, it will change the price when that club make a bid.

When he leave Juve for MU? exactly like Lukaku case, they paid overprice for him. Never worth 89m. The true value is set automatically after some time. If now he want to leave MU, his price will go down for sure, also because the player want the move. Again, don't see any relationship with completely different player in completely different country involving two completely different clubs.

Club has every right to set their initial price. But if the player want the move, it will change the price for sure. So, no, not the market, but the player's will will change the price.

Lol, I wrote that sentence, basically to said that not much improvement with Lukaku since joining Everton, what suddenly make him worth 75m is beyond me. Let me put this simple. MU buy Pogba for 89m, but we seems will get Bakayoko for 37m now. No relation at all. Maybe you then arguing, 'hey it happened last year, it's different window'. Ok, now if we bid for Belotti and the player want the move, ask you this question, will Torino said that, 'because MU buy Lukaku for 75m, Belotti worth much more than that sum'? Lol, no way, we will get much more less than that.

Don't understand why that should be any relation with another club players at all. One thing I can tell you, if MU want him, Spurs for sure set the price higher than they paid for Lukaku. If Real Madrid want to sign Kane, they can get him for much less than they would set the price for MU.

No way he is 60m player. Everton bought him 28m from us, unless he win PL title every year for Everton since then, no way his valuation went up that high. Everton set the price take it or leave it price and with his agent help, MU bite the bait, lol. It should not have any effect on other deals at all. Again, that is happened on their own world.

Everybody know Lukaku not worth 75m. Pure madness that. MU give them much more than it should be, like Pogba deal. Mino Raiola has the loudest laugh from all. And think it should not have any effect for another clubs. Yes, club will demand more money if they deal with MU instead.

For them, as signing from club rival and rumoured as Jose's most hated player.

Well now that MU has back off. Sign him up.

That's very strange indeed.

Signing KDB would master all of it.

Can we celebrate now?

Yup, just curious why didn't he try to buy Costa instead. Shit, I'm giving him an idea.

Strangest thing has happened. Jose want to buy Lukaku.

Really? think he is an AML

Don't think he will replace Sandro position, if they do sign him.

Chinese club has backed off, since his comment that he will only play for Chelsea or Atletico.

Batman obviously will stay, if that is the case. Don't worry, there are some options available if we offer the right price. My concern is that we need two more strikers to be able to run well in 4 competitions, when it looks like we are struggling to sign even one.

Maybe because he is China-bound. Any club would have to break their salary structure to match what Chinese club offering.

Chelsea vs Atletico in CL knockout stage next year would be fun.

Yes it could be the case, but we don't know anything what really discussed in the meeting and who request it. How if Atalanta who request about the meeting, somehow to begging for Juve not to take the option? who knows, at least they tried and paid off. Seems very much suggesting Juve did have an option, and Atalanta initiate the meeting requesting for him to stay.

If they have an opportunity, but didn't take it, I will consider they screwed it though. If I'm Juve fan, I'll be angry about it.

From my understanding, that possibility was I called "option". Whatever it was, at the end of the day it looks like Spinazzola will be loaned out for another year though. So my point stand still.

Di Marzio said the two club met today. What else they are talking about, if not there was an option?