Fabriccfc

3 miles can be North London! Easily. 3 miles can be outside of London.
It won't go on that long. I bet it will be sorted before the end of year.
Fair enough if you do. I don't think you've understood where 3 miles can take us though. 3 miles is too far.
.They can, but you think that's right? Also they can't use all the morally wrong tactics they like or it will look bad and damage the clubs reputation.
.Very few honestly, Don't just believe what you read on the forums. Most of the shareholders are reasonable long term fans and adults. The no at any cost posters are usually kids.
I'd say 90% of the NO voters just want more information and a say and the new stadium design and location. Regardless of the CPO, I think any clubs fans should get a say in what a new stadium would be like. It's usually a once in a century thing to move stadium. No fans wants to run the club, but we deserve an opinion on something like a new stadium.
I think the majority are very grateful to Roman and we trust him a lot. Me personally I trust him a lot, but 100%. No. I think that's foolish.
Where? I'm sure he didn't.
Again I'm 99% sure he didn't, and that's the point these are the things we want to negotiate.
Insulting NO voters like that and just thinking the only reason people have voted NO is because they don't trust Roman and they don't want to move from SB, shows me you don't understand the situation.
No. The club had debts of around 60-80 million pounds. The debt could not have been paid in time if we had continued as we were. However the club had many players on expensive contracts we could have sold and assets like the hotel etc. That could have sold. The club would have slipped out of the top 4 and down the table. However the club would not have folded.

3 miles can be North London! Easily. 3 miles can be outside of London.
It won't go on that long. I bet it will be sorted before the end of year.
Fair enough if you do. I don't think you've understood where 3 miles can take us though. 3 miles is too far.
.They can, but you think that's right? Also they can't use all the morally wrong tactics they like or it will look bad and damage the clubs reputation.
.Very few honestly, Don't just believe what you read on the forums. Most of the shareholders are reasonable long term fans and adults. The no at any cost posters are usually kids.
I'd say 90% of the NO voters just want more information and a say and the new stadium design and location. Regardless of the CPO, I think any clubs fans should get a say in what a new stadium would be like. It's usually a once in a century thing to move stadium. No fans wants to run the club, but we deserve an opinion on something like a new stadium.
I think the majority are very grateful to Roman and we trust him a lot. Me personally I trust him a lot, but 100%. No. I think that's foolish.
Where? I'm sure he didn't.
Again I'm 99% sure he didn't, and that's the point these are the things we want to negotiate.
Insulting NO voters like that and just thinking the only reason people have voted NO is because they don't trust Roman and they don't want to move from SB, shows me you don't understand the situation.
No. The club had debts of around 60-80 million pounds. The debt could not have been paid in time if we had continued as we were. However the club had many players on expensive contracts we could have sold and assets like the hotel etc. That could have sold. The club would have slipped out of the top 4 and down the table. However the club would not have folded.