Jump to content

The English Football Thread


Steve
 Share

Recommended Posts

oh please. The club told him to leave. We could have offered him a squad role and extended his contract but chose not to. If Roma would have told Totti to leave a few years ago and if he wanted to still play at the top level then I am certain he would have switched clubs as well.

Not to a direct competitive rival he wouldn't.

Wow, the counter-arguments for this are the weakest I've come across in Talk Chelsea history, too easy..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vesper

    9038

  • Laylabelle

    4770

  • Jase

    2657

  • Special Juan

    2604

Typical Newcastle. The highlight of their season was last week. Pardew has also got MOTM as well so he thinks he's safe for another year; just watch them piss away the rest of the season. Wankers.

The toast of Tyneside last week, probably being sent death threats as I type.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to a direct competitive rival he wouldn't.

Wow, the counter-arguments for this are the weakest I've come across in Talk Chelsea history, too easy..

But he didn't sign a contract with City.

He's with MLS.

I think he will be a liar if he doesn't serve a single day with the MLS team.

But they are not playing right now, so it's all good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he didn't sign a contract with City.

He's with MLS.

I think he will be a liar if he doesn't serve a single day with the MLS team.

But they are not playing right now, so it's all good.

cammon... he isn't so stupid to think that city will not take him..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cammon... he isn't so stupid to think that city will not take him..

If he really wanted City, why didn't he just sign with them in the first place?

That way he wouldn't have obligation to NYCFC when the new season starts.

How many years he sign with NYCFC?

4?

It will be a travesty if he serves 0 of those at the club.

For now there's nothing going on, and pre-season ain't nothing.

It's better for NYCFC that Lampard is at City. So that when the season starts Lampard will go to the club in the best shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he really wanted City, why didn't he just sign with them in the first place?

That way he wouldn't have obligation to NYCFC when the new season starts.

How many years he sign with NYCFC?

4?

It will be a travesty if he serves 0 of those at the club.

For now there's nothing going on, and pre-season ain't nothing.

It's better for NYCFC that Lampard is at City. So that when the season starts Lampard will go to the club in the best shape.

Still, for now, lamps hurting chelsea. legends don't do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to a direct competitive rival he wouldn't.

Wow, the counter-arguments for this are the weakest I've come across in Talk Chelsea history, too easy..

well actually there is no point debating about this because we both know neither of us are going to change our views about this whole situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lamps extending his loan would (and should) be seen as an attempt to harm Chelsea's title chances and that would be unforgivable. If that happens then I will not defend him when he gets flak, as he will be deserving of it.

Having said that, for now, I can just about restrain myself, though every time he scores a crucial goal for City it makes my skin crawl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mourinho is known for playing mind games. At least Mourinho had the decency to not join another English club. Lampard will never be the same in my eyes. Our all time top scorer, this is how he repays us. Absolute bellend.

Well if we hadn't come calling in 2013 he would have been man United coach now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if we hadn't come calling in 2013 he would have been man United coach now.

Mourinho was only here for just over 3 years though, a relatively short spell in his career. If he'd have joined United it would have been disappointing but the Lampard situation's completely different. Frank was here for 13 years - the vast majority of his career - and he was supposed to be proper Chels, one of us. Clearly not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You