Madmax 9,219 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 From Soccernet - "Chelsea's annual wage bill has soared to £172.5 million - almost £40 million more than the next highest payers Manchester City.The figure for the year ending June 2010 is revealed in Chelsea's full annual accounts lodged with Companies House on Friday and shows a significant increase on the previous year.In 2009, the club spent £165.6 million on wages but that sum included pay-offs worth £12.6 million to sacked manager Luiz Felipe Scolari and his assistants. Excluding the pay-offs, the rise in wages is £19.5 million and represents a 12.7% increase.Manchester City's wage bill is £133.3 million, Manchester United's £131.7 million and Arsenal are fourth with £110 million spent annually on salaries, according to their most recent accounts.Chelsea's wages are 82% of their turnover - more healthy than City's 106% - but way off United's level of 46% and Arsenal's of 49%.The figures also confirm that Chelsea reported losses of £70.9 million compared to £44.4 million the previous year. The club indicated earlier this week that they believe they will halve their losses in the next financial year.The latest accounts also reveal that Chelsea will be liable for £3.8 million extra in National Insurance contributions if HM Revenue and Customs succeeds in its legal case that image rights payments should be taxed as income.If that is proved, the players themselves would be liable to pay any tax individually in relation to image rights."82% wages to turnover is incredible bad. Financial fair play rules limit to 70%. The ouster of those 5 players in the summer would have shaved off a chunk of it but now with Torres the highest earner at the club and Luiz arriving, it's back to square one. Another summer clearout? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 You know things are f*cked when City are doing better than us in a financial sector. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Yet more evidence to support the claim Fernando is Drogba's replacement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matterz 67 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 This is for the year ending June 2010, when we still had Ballck, Joey, Deco, Belletti and Carvalho on the books, so things have obviously improved wage wise since then. And although city were spending less last season im sure with the new players they brought in over the summer and winter transfer windows they are right up there now and lets not forget Rooney's huge pay increase. Basically we will be better off next year when the financial results are audited and published in the wages area even with Torres and Luiz. We are obviously ina good financial position or we would not have purchased Torres and Luiz, the board are not stupid and we have cut huge costs since June 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5Essien5 33 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Torres shirt's maybe pay up himself and his salary in some years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 no need to panic .....yet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve 10,227 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Dont believe it. If it was that bad i cannot see how we would be signing players like we had. Roman is a smart man im sure he has figured a way around it/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strong centreback 157 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 You know things are f*cked when City are doing better than us in a financial sector.The latest man city financials dont include on the wage bill:dzeko - 7-8m payaya toure - 10m pakolorov - 4m paballotelli - 9m pasilva - 8m paboateng - 3-4m pamilner - 5-6m paand also the hughes and his backroom pay off, say 5-10mSo thats at a conservative guess another £46 on their wage bill plus a one off in the region of 5-10m, and also ours would have decreased by about 25-30m with the players that have gone this summer.Id expect another cull of deadwood and perhaps a top earner leaving as well so that the wage bill can be reduced further. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eldo 868 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 I think Matterz explained it well.How on earth can City have smaller wage bill with Tevez on 258k pw Yaya 220k Silva, Dzeko, Balotelli ... are also on massive wages.Rooney on 250k. It's definitely last season's.Btw i think that Ballack was on 130-140k pw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fulham Broadway 17,366 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Nah no problem. Loadsamoney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spuz 143 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Definately not as bad as this unreliable source is making out. £40m more than Man city-yeah right. Even before Toure and Dzeko I bet they were running us close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 As long as Torres stay injury free, we dont need Drogba anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.F. 1,484 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 We don't need Drogba ?! Still don't know why everybody think that 17 years old player can replace Drogba. This year he play bad, and everybody want him to go out from Chelsea, but last year when he was the best player, there was different story. Please shut up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson 358 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 We don't need Drogba ?! Still don't know why everybody think that 17 years old player can replace Drogba. This year he play bad, and everybody want him to go out from Chelsea, but last year when he was the best player, there was different story. Please shut up. Well said mate. I'm also getting sick of people saying we can get rid of Drogba, big fucking deal he's not having an amazing season like last season but I can assure you he will pick up. Like I said about Anelka but no, you all fucking bashed him! It will be seriously retarded not to keep Drogba and play him upfront with Torres. Remember, there is only ONE Didier Drogba!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 We don't need Drogba ?! Still don't know why everybody think that 17 years old player can replace Drogba. This year he play bad, and everybody want him to go out from Chelsea, but last year when he was the best player, there was different story. Please shut up. Stupid arguments. He is 33 years old. He is in decline. Hes been serving Chelsea for 7 seasons, why its really diificult to some people to accept that players dont play forever? I have read here that he has several years of world class football...Torres is here to replace him, nobody is talking about 17 years old player. Thats why we paid 50m on him, so please shut up.:eyebrows: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson 358 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Henrique shut up. Are you (and others) too stupid to realise he's still an amazing player. He has a lot left him. Age does not matter, he can still perform. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.F. 1,484 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Stupid arguments. He is 33 years old. He is in decline. Hes been serving Chelsea for 7 seasons, why its really diificult to some people to accept that players dont play forever? I have read here that he has several years of world class football...Torres is here to replace him, nobody is talking about 17 years old player. Thats why we paid 50m on him, so please shut up.:eyebrows:U are tipic gloryhunter. Every year Drogba is better and better, but this year he got malaria and... Give him more time and we will get old Drogba back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rambo 1,729 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Drogba is always the first to get knocked by our own supporters, people want him out once he starts under performing. I have faith DD will get his game back soon though, he always does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 Henrique shut up. Are you (and others) too stupid to realise he's still an amazing player. He has a lot left him. Age does not matter, he can still perform.Dont tell me to shut up, you are not talking with your mother. IMO he can leave, to open the door to new faces. Ballack was also a amazing player, but hes time at Chelsea just came to an end. If you think otherwise, ok, I dont care. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson 358 Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 You really want him to just leave? Not now. No chance. And dont tell you to shut up? You are the one that goes around telling people to shut up because you don't like their opinions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.