Daniel Sturridge and Franco Di Santo Partnership.

[Badboy 1,526]

hope ancelotti plays at least one of them enough to make an impact.

Which one would you play ?

[Term-X 7,891]

Which one would you play ?

di santo.

[Badboy 1,526]

di santo.

Why di santo over sturridge ?

[Term-X 7,891]

i watched a reserve team game against spurs were he scored 3 goals, and from our pre-season games alone you can see hes a natural goalscorer, he just needs games and most importantly patience.

...

haven't seen much of sturridge tbh.

Edited July 30, 2009 by Terminator X

[Steve 10,227]

I think both the lads have a very bright future. At the moment but i think Sturridge is a little more devoloped in his play in comparison to Di santo. But that being said i do not think he is that far behind. I think if he does go on this load deal to blackburn, playing against other PL teams he can improve alot and hopfully start most games.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Sturridge has more PL experience, which is why we signed him - he is a young, aspiring, talented footballer who has already played at the top level in England, to reasonable success for somebody his age. Franco di Santo has a lot of raw talent, but if I was to pick a partner for Anelka during the Cup of Nations, it would be Sturridge and Shevchenko over di Santo, at this moment at least. I really think we need to send Franco on loan until January to see what he can do.