the wes 7,212 Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 Chelsea will offer Michael Ballack a performance-related contract as the club tries to move away from its reliance on Roman Abramovich's billions. The Germany midfielder's deal expires at the end of the season, but both parties are keen to secure the 32-year-old's services for at least another year. Ballack earns £121,000 a week after arriving on a free transfer from Bayern Munich before the 2006 World Cup. Although a new contract would be based on a lower salary, the player could earn significant bonuses if he and the team perform well, according to reports in The Times. Ballack is happy with the proposal, but reports suggest he would prefer a two-year contact. Chelsea are overhauling their wage structure to offset the problems of an aging squad, which could see older players more susceptible to injury or loss of form. The change will also allow Chelsea to function without Abramovich injecting cash, but the Blues deny this is connected to the oligarch's losses in the Russian stock market. Frank Lampard's five-year deal is understood to include successive wage increases for the first three years before taking a pay cut for the last two years of his contract, whilst negotiations with Didier Drogba, Joe Cole and John Obi Mikel, who all have 18 months left on their deals, will wait until the summer. Chelsea boss Luiz Felipe Scolari has been told he will not have money to spend in the transfer window unless Chelsea suffer injuries or receive strong offers for fringe players, but the Blues can expect to strengthen in the summer. The club has already received £12million from Manchester City for Wayne Bridge and will look to recoup funds from the sales of Florent Malouda and Salomon Kalou.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/...e.html?ITO=1490 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kez 2,727 Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 We are selling Kalou? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,539 Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 WTF?!If we're not gana buy whats the point in selling?!Thats just gana no doubt leave us short soon if we do sell them,have a sodding injury cirsis soon as the window shuts or something stupid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesthetic Relic 301 Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 Malouda I see sense in that, but Kalou (as much as he is frustrating) is definately one for the future. Didnt he top the list last season for assists ? As for Ballack, If he's happy with a reduction in pay at least the club can meet him halfway and offer him a 2 year deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAS 0 Posted January 8, 2009 Share Posted January 8, 2009 We are selling Kalou? oh no!!! I don't want it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
misschief 24 Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 I think this new style contract for our older players is a really smart move. Look at what Sheva earned and what we realistically got for our money. No more over 30's coming to SB to sit back on a big pay day. Really good idea from Chelsea for a change. Besides, you'll soon see the merceneries hot foot it out the club then. Glad to hear the five year deal they gave Lampard see's a reduction in his salary after 3 years as well. I'm really liking this particular financial change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry26 6 Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 Malouda I see sense in that, but Kalou (as much as he is frustrating) is definately one for the future. Didnt he top the list last season for assists ? i agree with that salou is frustrating at times but he works his socks off and you can sometime see what he tries to do flo on the other hand disappears in the game and looks lost Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 Selling Malouda and Kalou? When we need wingers? That makes sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted January 9, 2009 Author Share Posted January 9, 2009 am i the only Chelsea fan who thinks kalou is crap :unsure: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesthetic Relic 301 Posted January 9, 2009 Share Posted January 9, 2009 am i the only Chelsea fan who thinks kalou is crap :unsure: I'm sure you're not. I just think he's a frustrating player to watch at times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliott 7 Posted January 10, 2009 Share Posted January 10, 2009 Why would we sell both Kalou AND Malouda? Haha. We can't afford to let either go, even though they're not good enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,539 Posted January 10, 2009 Share Posted January 10, 2009 Kalou does frustrate but he does make an effort and can make an impact when coming on and why sell now?!Summer make more sense surley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.