Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

West Ham 3-1 Chelsea

ZAPHOD2319

By ZAPHOD2319,
in Chelsea Match Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 607
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

We Hate Scouse
We Hate Scouse

We had a period in the first half of about 25-30 minutes where we played absolutely exceptional football. It was what we were missing last season and really was refreshing to see. Unfortunately,

LAM09
LAM09

All I can think about is the PK. If you fail to take such chances, you can't complain about the outcome. We HAVE to buy a proven goalscorer before the window shuts.

Magic Lamps
Magic Lamps

Caicedo is the same absolute shit buy as Mudryk based on one flash season and some perceived potential 

Posted Images

MoroccanBlue

MoroccanBlue 5,293

Posted
Posted
On 13/08/2023 at 17:41, NikkiCFC said:

              Sanchez

James   Silva   Colwill   Chilwell

       Caicedo    Lavia

                 Enzo

Sterling   Jackson   Mudryk

I'd play this but add in Disasi and put Colwill at LB.

Need to handle their route one bull shit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mhsc

Mhsc 874

Posted
Posted

Given how much time Santos has had to learn the system and how well he did in preseason I would be tempted to give him the nod over Lavia.

Caicedo though should defo slot in right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hiterto

hiterto 35

Posted
Posted

I think Conor Gallagher did exceptionally well against Liverpool and he should be retained. He is going to be a great player. My Team would be:

              Sanchez

James   Silva   Colwill   Chilwell

               Caicedo 

         Enzo         Conor

Madueke         Jackson      Mydruk

                                              

Link to comment
Share on other sites
robsblubot

robsblubot 3,496

Posted
Posted (edited)

These starting lineups look unbalanced to me; OK to use in away games against the top teams, or City, but just not enough attacking players against smaller outfits.

Enzo is quality coming from behind. You move him up and you run a risk of making him ineffective. Lavia never caught my attention as someone I should be watching, but we need a player who can linkup and/or join the attack, otherwise we will struggle with goals.

Now for the love of me, please get it through your thick heads! 😆 STERLING WILL PLAY! It's easier if you just accept that reality. I mean it will save you a lot of useless posts listing players who will never start. 

Edited by robsblubot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fernando

Fernando 6,448

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, robsblubot said:

These starting lineups look unbalanced to me; OK to use in away games against the top teams, or City, but just not enough attacking players against smaller outfits.

Enzo is quality coming from behind. You move him up and you run a risk of making him ineffective. Lavia never caught my attention as someone I should be watching, but we need a player who can linkup and/or join the attack, otherwise we will struggle with goals.

Now for the love of me, please get it through your thick heads! 😆 STERLING WILL PLAY! It's easier if you just accept that reality. I mean it will save you a lot of useless posts listing players who will never start. 

Quote

Enzo is quality coming from behind. You move him up and you run a risk of making him ineffective.

Dude you didn't watch the LIverpool games as he was way better ahead then behind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lucio

lucio 5,418

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, hiterto said:

I think Conor Gallagher did exceptionally well against Liverpool and he should be retained. He is going to be a great player. My Team would be:

              Sanchez

James   Silva   Colwill   Chilwell

               Caicedo 

         Enzo         Conor

Madueke         Jackson      Mydruk

                                              

Made some good tackles but was awful other than that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
robsblubot

robsblubot 3,496

Posted
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Fernando said:

Dude you didn't watch the LIverpool games as he was way better ahead then behind. 

behind: he's always facing the opposition goal.  (helps with his best quality: passing as he has full view of movements in attack)

Ahead: has his back to the opposition goal often. (he will have to often deal with pressure at his back and will need to turn to make a pass/assist).

Different characteristics. Enzo is Enzo, not KDB.

Edited by robsblubot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
YorkshireBlue

YorkshireBlue 3,122

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, robsblubot said:

behind: he's always facing the opposition goal.  (helps with his best quality: passing as he has full view of movements in attack)

Ahead: has his back to the opposition goal often. (he will have to often deal with pressure at his back and will need to turn to make a pass/assist).

Different characteristics. Enzo is Enzo, not KDB.

Tell me you didn't watch the pool game, without telling me you didn't watch the pool game......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
robsblubot

robsblubot 3,496

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, YorkshireBlue said:

Tell me you didn't watch the pool game, without telling me you didn't watch the pool game......

I did watch the pool game. I did watch the pool game. 😄

Now if you want Enzo in a CAM position... then I'm out of the discussion, sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
robsblubot

robsblubot 3,496

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, robsblubot said:

I did watch the pool game. I did watch the pool game. 😄

Now if you want Enzo in a CAM position... then I'm out of the discussion, sorry.

Shamelessly self-replying here. 😅

Sorry, I did not want to sound definitive with the above point given it's just my opinion. Don't like the idea of moving a deep-lying mid, who has passing as his main virtue, up the pitch to be closer to the attackers. I typically see this going the other way around; like Fabregas, who moved from CAM to deep-lying mid.

Of course, it can and does happen in specific circumstances, like in a particular game where the opposition allows your midfield line to step up (at times against Liverpool). I'm referring to actually making his position a CAM as some of the proposed lineups posted here might suggest.

That I'm not a fan of--rarely (never?) seen it work: you don't gain the CAM you need, and you lose the quality deep-lying mid you had.

Edited by robsblubot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheHulk

TheHulk 1,850

Posted
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

Yeah Lavia won't be ready so from my predicted lineup I put Conor instead of him. 

He is ready, keep Conor warming the bench to avoid any injury before we sell him.

Edited by TheHulk
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter