Jype 6,398 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 For just 12million?! Laughable!!Not even Chelsea's board can be that stupid. Real Madrid have so many wonderful players and if we wanted them we'd have to pay way over the odds to get them.They can have Ivanovic if they give Özil and Sahin in exchange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 And guess what? Even the linesman gets the boot! Why? Because the decision was in favour of Chelsea and not the other way around.The linesman that also awarded us 2 offside goals? Let's not have double standards here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 The linesman that also awarded us 2 offside goals? Let's not have double standards here I guess the point is: Was the lines man that allowed two offside goals for manure against us also suspended? Blue Armour 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 I guess the point is: Was the lines man that allowed two offside goals for manure against us also suspended?Someone should go check that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieran. 6,317 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 IVANOVIC APPEALS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jype 6,398 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 Interesting. Could it be that by appealing against it the ban could be delayed until a decision has been made and Ivanovic would therefore be available against Spurs on Sunday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kieran. 6,317 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 That's what I thought, too. But they're having the hearing tomorrow so I can't see that being the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amblève. 4,995 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 IVANOVIC APPEALSI'm probably wrong, but won't he be suspended for even 4 games if the FA didn't accept the plea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 I'm probably wrong, but won't he be suspended for even 4 games if the FA didn't accept the plea?My thoughts are exactly that! If the FA turn down the appeal, Ivanovic's ban will likely to increase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Armour 4,572 Posted April 11, 2012 Share Posted April 11, 2012 The linesman that also awarded us 2 offside goals? Let's not have double standards here I guess the point is: Was the lines man that allowed two offside goals for manure against us also suspended?Yep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fulham Broadway 17,491 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 If its a 4 game ban -ie the appeal is rejected, means he'll miss the barcodes game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 I just don't get why he would appeal. It's most certainly going to be rejected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmax 9,219 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 They denied Derry's appeal allowing Young to get away with a blatant dive while being offside, what hope do we stand? Should have just got on with things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bir_CFC 3,455 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 Don't understand why he would appeal. Unless he got Maloney himself to say he didn't punch him, I see no way out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 The appeal has been dismissed. Again, no surprises with it.http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/Disciplinary/NewsAndFeatures/2012/branislav-ivanovic-chelsea-wigan-appeal-rejectedChelsea defender Branislav Ivanovic’s appeal against an FA charge for violent conduct has been dismissed.The incident, which was not seen by the match officials but caught on video, occurred during his side’s game against Wigan at Stamford Bridge on Saturday 7 April 2012.A Regulatory Commission heard the claim today and Ivanovic’s three match suspension will commence with immediate effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madmax 9,219 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 Hopefully it's not deemed a 'frivolous appeal' and he can play against Newcastle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 Hopefully it's not deemed a 'frivolous appeal' and he can play against Newcastle.Sam Wallace @SamWallaceIndyCFC on rejected Ivanovic appeal: 'We note the FA did not deem our appeal frivolous and it therefore had merit'. Hmmm, but it was rejectedOnly a 3-match ban I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 Confirmed three match ban: robdog 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fulham Broadway 17,491 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 I just don't get why he would appeal. It's most certainly going to be rejected.It wouldnt be his decision -someone on the board would decide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted April 12, 2012 Share Posted April 12, 2012 It wouldnt be his decision -someone on the board would decideI guess they knew it won't get prolonged to four matches, but were hoping that the appeal will delay the ban till after the Tottenham match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now