Chelsea Transfers

[robsblubot 3,595]

5 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

So like a 230m offer for him? Can see why most of you don't work in football.

Think you are missing wages: players can have negative value when they are on inflated wages.

I'm not saying that's the case with all these players, but their "value" may be much lower than what is reported/asked due to wages.

[LegenTerry 273]

13 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

So like a 230m offer for him? Can see why most of you don't work in football.

They do...In Football manager.

[YorkshireBlue 3,271]

17 minutes ago, robsblubot said:

Think you are missing wages: players can have negative value when they are on inflated wages.

I'm not saying that's the case with all these players, but their "value" may be much lower than what is reported/asked due to wages.

Regardless of wages, we payed 100m for rom 72m for kepa, 38m for disaster then throw another 40m on top? For a player people didn't wanna pay 100m for? But are happy to throw 210m on assets plus 40m cash..... Insanity 

Edited August 15, 2024 by YorkshireBlue

[robsblubot 3,595]

9 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

Regardless of wages, we payed 100m for rom 72m for kepa, 38m for disaster then through another 40m on top? For a player people didn't wanna pay 100m for? But are happy to throw 110m on assets plus 40m cash..... Insanity 

What we paid for them is no longer important esp once we put them on high wages. Would be the same as City asking 100m for Grealish right now. It was already overpaid back then. 

We can ask whatever value we want for players, the question is about demand: who is going to pay that AND then take on the player's wages (in full).

They were all big losses... shit happens. Player can pick up a bad injury and his value would plummet.

Edited August 15, 2024 by robsblubot

[King Kante 1,643]

40 minutes ago, YorkshireBlue said:

So like a 230m offer for him? Can see why most of you don't work in football.

I wasn't being serious. However, I do believe that Disaster is absolutely awful and doesn't and shouldn't ever be anywhere near the first team. 

[Mário César 1,250]

 

[TheHulk 2,432]

7 minutes ago, Mário César said:

 

What was the point of even buying them.

[Mário César 1,250]

Just now, TheHulk said:

What was the point of even buying them.

Really pathetic

[YorkshireBlue 3,271]

15 minutes ago, robsblubot said:

What we paid for them is no longer important esp once we put them on high wages. Would be the same as City asking 100m for Grealish right now. It was already overpaid back then. 

We can ask whatever value we want for players, the question is about demand: who is going to pay that AND then take on the player's wages (in full).

They were all big losses... shit happens. Player can pick up a bad injury and his value would plummet.

Shit does happen, imagine if the mortgage companies said that when you ring up complaining your house has dropped 30k in valuation, shit happens sir 🤣

[NikkiCFC 8,315]

5 minutes ago, TheHulk said:

What was the point of even buying them.

 

4 minutes ago, Mário César said:

Really pathetic

I like how club is proactive and already willing to sell players we purchased recently that didn't turned out good. Madueke, Mudryk, Sterling, Disasi, Badiashile, Washington, Angelo, Moreira and some others... Apparently all available on the market. 

[robsblubot 3,595]

Just now, YorkshireBlue said:

Shit does happen, imagine if the mortgage companies said that when you ring up complaining your house has dropped 30k in valuation, shit happens sir 🤣

That's actually a good example and exactly my point--2002 housing crash.

People took on those crazy loans betting on a future increase of asset price: so, the mortgage would be our player wages, and the house value the player asking fee.

As soon as the value of the houses (player's value) dropped like a rock, it made no sense to pay mortgage anymore and they couldn't sell the houses for a value anywhere high enough to cover the mortgage incurred, so people just stopped paying which caused the cascading effect in the financial & housing markets.

That's me talking about finance... sure we have better people around to do that. 😅

[TheHulk 2,432]

10 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

 

I like how club is proactive and already willing to sell players we purchased recently that didn't turned out good. Madueke, Mudryk, Sterling, Disasi, Badiashile, Washington, Angelo, Moreira and some others... Apparently all available on the market. 

Most of us knew a lot of them we're busts from the get go, selling them after a season only confirms the scouting is completely clueless. Also most of them will be sold for cheaper than they were bought, so what a waste of time and money.

Edited August 15, 2024 by TheHulk

[Stats 7,142]

12 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

 

I like how club is proactive and already willing to sell players we purchased recently that didn't turned out good. Madueke, Mudryk, Sterling, Disasi, Badiashile, Washington, Angelo, Moreira and some others... Apparently all available on the market. 

I disagree. Why buy players like Angelo if you are going to sell him after one season. He is defo more talented than Moreira and is still a potential very good player. It is quite silly to say Madueke didn't turn out good when he got himself in the team last season and had a good spell and is young enough to improve. It is about whether the club give him a chance to do that. I am in a minority here but don't think Badiashile is as bad as people make out. He is not world clas but decent defender imo. 

Washington was a pointless buy from the beginning. Had very little first team experience and we overspent on a player who majority of fans did not understand from the off. Defo will not be able to sell for even half the fee we bought him for.

[ZAPHOD2319 4,814]

 

[LAM09 7,046]

7 hours ago, JFKvsNixon said:

The investigation has not got anything to do with the FA, it's the Premier League.

This is where it gets interesting. The Premier League is owned by the clubs who are currently in it, and I'm not so sure that Liverpool, Man Utd, Arsenal et al would be open to allowing Man City get off with a soft punishment, especially after they refused to cooperate with the investigation. Let's not forget that many clubs have made big sacrifices to ensure they stayed within the regulations, so they'll also want their pound of flesh.

The only question for me is whether or not the Premier League managed to get their regulations watertight enough to survive the legal challenge that Man City will bring. It's worth noting that the Premier league does have the resources to ensure that they had all their ducks in a row, so there's every chance that Man City will get the book thrown at them.

If I had to choose a punishment, I'd given them a 200 to 400 point deduction that would carry over through the following seasons, on top of a long transfer ban. It would be interesting to see them struggle to hold on to their players, whilst they drop down through the leagues.

The FA/PL, I was putting them under the same bracket, but thank you for correcting me.

Either way, the PL could try to save face rather than let it be known that City managed to get away with all of this for over a decade. I'm sure by the time whatever punishment comes their way, most of their key players will be long gone, including the manager (there's more to his timely desire to move on in the next year or so).