Chelsea Transfers

[LAM09 7,085]

20 hours ago, YorkshireBlue said:

Maybe a few years ago but not so much anymore, the clubs in the premier League that have more pull than us this window are, man city, arsenal and man utd and Newcastle, Newcastle have a huge wealth and are a club on the rise! I see similarities to the way man city started. Next season you could be looking at 

Man city

Man utd

Arsenal

Chelsea

Newcastle 

Liverpool

All fighting for top 4, you could even throw spurs and Brighton in that list aswell. Getting top 4 over the next few years will be harder than its ever been.

 

19 hours ago, Vesper said:

I don't, we are a fucking hot mess and have no CL or even EL to offer

we also have a shit, small stadium and likely will not have a new one until 2030 or so at the earliest

the main thing we have going for us is London itself, and that we are in the EPL

our winning past is exactly that atm, the past

There was a typo on my end. I meant, we're surely after an undisputed first choice CF. The days of us being among the most appealing sides are long gone.

[LAM09 7,085]

3 hours ago, Pizy said:

Surprised there aren’t more rumors about some of our players leaving and their potential destinations. There haven’t really been any reports about what’s happening with Pulisic or Ziyech in particular. Players who will certainly be going.

Napoli's president has spoken about his interest in Pulisic. Add him to any potential deal for Osimhen in the process.

[MoroccanBlue 5,399]

2 hours ago, Mário César said:

55M for mount?

I hope clube sell him 

Hopefully Liverpool or Arsenal comeback with counter offers. 

[Fernando 6,723]

I would still keep Gallagher. 

This season everyone was bad, and this kid has a desire to play and be with us. With a better manager he might improve. 

Would have liked Mount to continue but if he wants to go, then nothing we can do. Take the money. 

But Gallagher I hope he gets a shot with Poch. 

[Mário César 1,475]

47 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

 

There was a typo on my end. I meant, we're surely after an undisputed first choice CF. The days of us being among the most appealing sides are long gone.

the better club for clear reason is city 

if we avoid city, all clubs are around the same prestigious 

we won a ucl 2 years ago

united only won one carabao cup in the last 6 years for exemple

even arsenal only this season qualified for ucl after 6 years failing top4

liverpool will play in europa league that is a shit anyway and don't won any major trophy since 2020 

[MoroccanBlue 5,399]

1 hour ago, Fernando said:

I would still keep Gallagher. 

This season everyone was bad, and this kid has a desire to play and be with us. With a better manager he might improve. 

Would have liked Mount to continue but if he wants to go, then nothing we can do. Take the money. 

But Gallagher I hope he gets a shot with Poch. 

Gallagher has a lot of developing to do. 

Least he could be content to play second fiddle to Nkunku so that's a bonus. 

[LAM09 7,085]

32 minutes ago, Mário César said:

the better club for clear reason is city 

if we avoid city, all clubs are around the same prestigious 

we won a ucl 2 years ago

united only won one carabao cup in the last 6 years for exemple

even arsenal only this season qualified for ucl after 6 years failing top4

liverpool will play in europa league that is a shit anyway and don't won any major trophy since 2020 

A number of players are shortsighted and might even see Arsenal above us based on this season alone.

United were able to entice players in the past to join them by offering massive wages, so I hope we don't follow suit. 

[Mário César 1,475]

1 hour ago, LAM09 said:

A number of players are shortsighted and might even see Arsenal above us based on this season alone.

United were able to entice players in the past to join them by offering massive wages, so I hope we don't follow suit. 

yes I understand that but I think most of clubs are the same boat except city for logical reasons 

if we stay without europe and specially top4 in the next 2/3 years its much more problematic for us 

but well newcastle get top4 this season and has been a weak club in the last several years and manage to get great players without european football to challenge for top4

gabriel jesus, zinchenko, casemiro were to clubs without champions league

one season without european football its ok but welll 2 or 3 years its a bit more hard to us

besides this reasons we have a good team. need 3/4 players to fix some areas of our squad but with a proper coach, a proper clinical health team and a proper PRE SEASON I think we can expect good things next season

we need really to avoid injuries. depends a lot of that 

[LAM09 7,085]

Just now, Mário César said:

yes I understand that but I think most of clubs are the same boat except city for logical reasons 

if we stay without europe and specially top4 in the next 2/3 years its much more problematic for us 

but well newcastle get top4 this season and has been a weak club in the last several years and manage to get great players without european football to challenge for top4

gabriel jesus, zinchenko, casemiro were to clubs without champions league

one season without european football its ok but welll 2 or 3 years its a bit more hard to us

besides this reasons we have a good team. need 3/4 players to fix some areas of our squad but with a proper coach, a proper clinical health team and a proper PRE SEASON I think we can expect good things next season

we need really to avoid injuries. depends a lot of that 

I didn't mention the lack of European football going forward, as I'm hoping this will be an exception similar to Mou's last campaign. If we don't qualify for the top 4, at the very least, we'll be in serious trouble on a few fronts.

[Mário César 1,475]

13 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

I didn't mention the lack of European football going forward, as I'm hoping this will be an exception similar to Mou's last campaign. If we don't qualify for the top 4, at the very least, we'll be in serious trouble on a few fronts.

we will become and be a lost club in the premierleague 

we need to be smart in transfer market 

[Superblue 6,372]

I do think a manager can make a big difference in some player's decisions on moving clubs. 

The lure of Man City is very much down to Pep in my opinion, and I think City know it too. 

 

[LAM09 7,085]

28 minutes ago, Mário César said:

we will become and be a lost club in the premierleague 

we need to be smart in transfer market 

I can't think of the last time we were tbh. Kante had a buy out clause & Silva fell into our hands at the perfect time.

4 minutes ago, Superblue said:

I do think a manager can make a big difference in some player's decisions on moving clubs. 

The lure of Man City is very much down to Pep in my opinion, and I think City know it too. 

 

Without question. Mourinho still had it when he originally joined Roma, and his recent successes has only strengthened that.

A City win in Istanbul could change that.

[Mário César 1,475]

24 minutes ago, Superblue said:

I do think a manager can make a big difference in some player's decisions on moving clubs. 

The lure of Man City is very much down to Pep in my opinion, and I think City know it too. 

 

yes ofc 

[TheHulk 2,636]

Go already.

[MoroccanBlue 5,399]

United won't be too bad. 

[TheHulk 2,636]

Finally getting rid of one of the most toxic parts of our fanbase.

[Pizy 19,251]

Something massive must have happened behind the scenes during contract negotiations for him to want to go. Probably what he would feel was disrespectful. He was probably asking for crazy money like Saka just got from Arse (300K per week) to be amongst the highest paid in the league and we rightly said no after the stinker last 18 months he’s had.

It’s going to be weird as fuck seeing what everyone considered Mr. Chelsea for the past 3-4 years in the shirt of a direct rival. United would be a pretty weird move for him, though. Liverpool made a ton of sense. Bruno is like their main creative spark and one of the first names on the team sheet. And they have Eriksen as well. So he’s going to go to a team with just as much competition for a place as he has here?

Being Klopp’s new Milner-like workhorse makes more sense.

[TheHulk 2,636]

 

[MoroccanBlue 5,399]

He's joining United clearly for money reasons. No way Liverpool or Arsenal pay what he wants despite them being way better moves for him. 

Still there will be Chelsea fans slating the club. 

 

Edited May 24, 2023 by MoroccanBlue

[Vegetable 830]

26 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Something massive must have happened behind the scenes during contract negotiations for him to want to go. Probably what he would feel was disrespectful. He was probably asking for crazy money like Saka just got from Arse (300K per week) to be amongst the highest paid in the league and we rightly said no after the stinker last 18 months he’s had.

It’s going to be weird as fuck seeing what everyone considered Mr. Chelsea for the past 3-4 years in the shirt of a direct rival. United would be a pretty weird move for him, though. Liverpool made a ton of sense. Bruno is like their main creative spark and one of the first names on the team sheet. And they have Eriksen as well. So he’s going to go to a team with just as much competition for a place as he has here?

Being Klopp’s new Milner-like workhorse makes more sense.

Money.

I think his mentality towards this is quite public, so see zero surprise here. His demands was elite, his performance not quite. And surely this way of being is not quite what TB sees as super suitable for his "project".

Fun thing about the "mr Chelsea" is that it's his fanbase that made this name. People saw super Chelsea mentality in him, new captain, new Lampard and new Terry, but had he ever seen himself this way, I'm not quite sure.