Chelsea Transfers

[Last Sicarius 610]

6 minutes ago, whats happening said:

they could not add 40-50 millions and buy haaland? i dont get it

Well it not so easy. BVB really dont want to sell him they are ok to lost over 50% and sell him in next year(they think CL in next season will cover it). And with Haaland we need to get more money for agent and his father. I would say it would be over 200mln euro for him now.

Edited August 3, 2021 by Last Sicarius

[Pizy 18,850]

Hope we don’t blow our whole load on Lukaku and still have money for Koundé and potentially a midfielder.

[whats happening 1,612]

8 minutes ago, Last Sicarius said:

Well it not so easy. BVB really dont want to sell him they are ok to lost over 50% and sell him in next year(they think CL in next season will cover it). And with Haaland we need to get more money for agent and his father. I would say it would be over 200mln euro for him now.

i thought roman really wanted him 🙄

[Vesper 30,085]

18 minutes ago, Jas said:

Guessing this will be the decisive bid.....

 

£400K per week

around £220m spend (t-fee + 5 years salary) not counting add-ons or agent fees

[Marvin123 527]

5 years of 25+ prem goals a season for me. I'm so happy.....

[Vesper 30,085]

12 minutes ago, Pizy said:

My goodness that’s a fuck load of money. 

£400K per week

around £220m spend (t-fee + 5 years salary) not counting add-ons or agent fees

[milka 3,390]

he always wanted to be Drogba for Chelsea  now he get 2nd chance 

 

 

Edited August 3, 2021 by milka

[Special Juan 28,094]

It's happening.

[calculatingInfinity 1,472]

Not a fan of spending this much on Lukaku. But it's hard to see alternatives I guess, if Håland isnt an option.

[hiterto 37]

I hope we don't sign Lukaku. He will no doubt be another disaster striker signing. At best he was OK in EPL and I cannot believe he will be any better after his time in Serie A.

The amount mentioned is way too much and I would rather we sign Danny Ings, who is every bit as good if not better than Lukaku. Complete waste of Money and if this happens he may be ranked in Same Category as Kepa and Shivshenko

[Special Juan 28,094]

4 minutes ago, hiterto said:

I hope we don't sign Lukaku. He will no doubt be another disaster striker signing. At best he was OK in EPL and I cannot believe he will be any better after his time in Serie A.

The amount mentioned is way too much and I would rather we sign Danny Ings, who is every bit as good if not better than Lukaku. Complete waste of Money and if this happens he may be ranked in Same Category as Kepa and Shivshenko

Never read so much shite in my life....go to bed 

[milka 3,390]

7 minutes ago, hiterto said:

I hope we don't sign Lukaku. He will no doubt be another disaster striker signing. At best he was OK in EPL and I cannot believe he will be any better after his time in Serie A.

The amount mentioned is way too much and I would rather we sign Danny Ings, who is every bit as good if not better than Lukaku. Complete waste of Money and if this happens he may be ranked in Same Category as Kepa and Shivshenko

Lukaku struggling  before  and was too young   we had Drogba, Torres , Sturridge Anelka , Kalou -   imagine if he flop again and  - 130m for player we sold before and he flop again after  his return 

 

Edited August 3, 2021 by milka

[King Kante 1,643]

1 hour ago, Magic Lamps said:

It is quite ridiculous signing Kounde and Lukaku

We are about to sign

a centre back who is all flashy skills, dribbling and technique but tiny and weak

and a centre forward who is all height, strength and power but no skill, dribbling nor technique

and each is gonna cost a ton...

you could not make this up.

You can if you see 2015 to now as a whole instead of isolating 2017 and shifting it to Conte. Barring last season the club have been pulling this nonsense for six years now. 

Edited August 3, 2021 by King Kante

[King Kante 1,643]

16 minutes ago, calculatingInfinity said:

Not a fan of spending this much on Lukaku. But it's hard to see alternatives I guess, if Håland isnt an option.

Honestly, I'd would have preferred to have kept Giroud or even give Tammy another year. 

[NikkiCFC 8,286]

1 hour ago, Pizy said:

Watching Lukaku’s goal compilation from this last season and you can’t help but be impressed. 

Impressed by what? Penalties and sitters? Not one single impressive goal.

He is more clinical, I give him that. We spoke many times how Werner and Havertz have 25% conversation rate of big chances.

Lukaku last season in Seria A and CL: 28 goals from 49 big chances so this is 57%.

I honestly expect Lewandowski to be better player in 37 than Lukaku in 32 so we should have spend 120m on him.