Jump to content

Chelsea Transfers


Tomo
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://www.google.com/amp/s/theprideoflondon.com/2021/07/22/Chelsea-transfers-kalajdzic-realistic-up-top/amp/

Chelsea are considering a swoop for 6ft 7in striker Sasa Kalajdzic as their move for Dortmund hitman Erling Haaland stalls... so, what could Blues fans expect from the Stuttgart giant who has named Man Utd midfielder Nemanja Matic as an inspiration?

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-9806561/amp/Chelsea-Blues-fans-expect-Sasa-Kalajdzic-Erling-Haaland-stalls.html

 

Interesting alternative, IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think plan is to sell all the possible players, collect +200m and in the end of transfer window to drop all on striker. With that kind of money all of Haaland, Kane, Lewa could be bought. This is why we are lightly enquiring about all of them to see which club is most likely to accept. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Blue Armour said:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/theprideoflondon.com/2021/07/22/Chelsea-transfers-kalajdzic-realistic-up-top/amp/

Chelsea are considering a swoop for 6ft 7in striker Sasa Kalajdzic as their move for Dortmund hitman Erling Haaland stalls... so, what could Blues fans expect from the Stuttgart giant who has named Man Utd midfielder Nemanja Matic as an inspiration?

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-9806561/amp/Chelsea-Blues-fans-expect-Sasa-Kalajdzic-Erling-Haaland-stalls.html

 

Interesting alternative, IMO

Interesting for sure but I don't think he is our man. He is relatively quick and nimble for someone this tall but not really strong at that. Would get found at at PL atm. His technique is quite polished tho, can usually trust him to hold the ball up and find a pass. But I would prefer a natural athlete to be our backup striker. Someone with real pace who can press. give Broja 1,2 years and he will be far better than Kalajdzic is now, esp for our system. Kalajdzic to be optimally effective needs the team to play around him, we can not do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me it is Haaland or someone of that calibre or no-one. There is no rush, we can try again in January and next summer but in the long-term it is much more productive having someone that wants to be here than having someone who wants a bigger paycheck or wants to play at a certain team.

The club is selling unwanted assets that can be sold since they're still technically taking a hit on all those who signed for big money, Drinky Baka barkley baba etc. I don't think they will sign any squad players that can be filled from the youth or reserves. Bakayoko could be our CM4 next season if his loans have taught him anything. Loftus-cheek could be a squad player in CM and AM. 

The problem really is defence at the end of the day. Thiago has one more year left in him and Azpi, Rudi and Christensen's contracts are all up at the end of the year. If Christensen isn't trusted to be Thiago's replacement then we need a ball playing defender which is a bit dodgy since you could get a Luiz that gets outed if you want to switch to 4 defenders. It all rests on who replaces Zouma as he is clearly the odd one out. Azpi or James at RCB is a bit dodgy as they are both a bit short and the question would still be who would we sign on the right to replace them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who plays with a striker these days?

Not the teams who played the CL finals, that's for sure. It does not seem to prevent City from winning the PL every other season. Not Liverpool... do they even have a striker in roster?

Certainly Arsenal and Tottenham employ dedicated strikers... and have been doing so well. United with Cavani now, but not that powerhouse either.

Real is the only strong competitive team which employs a dedicated striker atm, or am I missing someone?

I'm absolutely not saying that one can't be competitive with a striker, but rather that most competitive teams nowadays choose to exchange that specialist with more mobile players who can press.

Agreed with the above post: either get someone like Haaland or don't break what we have.

Edited by robsblubot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, NikkiCFC said:

I think plan is to sell all the possible players, collect +200m and in the end of transfer window to drop all on striker. With that kind of money all of Haaland, Kane, Lewa could be bought. This is why we are lightly enquiring about all of them to see which club is most likely to 

Not one of those clubs will accept a bid that late in the window.

If we're targeting any of those 3 strikers., this month would be the time to get it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, robsblubot said:

Who plays with a striker these days?

Not the teams who played the CL finals, that's for sure. It does not seem to prevent City from winning the PL every other season. Not Liverpool... do they even have a striker in roster?

Certainly Arsenal and Tottenham employ dedicated strikers... and have been doing so well. United with Cavani now, but not that powerhouse either.

Real is the only strong competitive team which employs a dedicated striker atm, or am I missing someone?

I'm absolutely not saying that one Cann't possibly be competitive with striker, but rather that most competitive teams nowadays chose to exchange that specialist with more mobile players who can press.


 

I dont think it's really about having a striker, but about having a consistent goal threat. If we had someone even from midfield filling that description, we would be in a better position.

No one from our team meets that description.

Yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Blue Armour said:

I dont think it's really about having a striker, but about having a consistent goal threat. If we had someone even from midfield filling that description, we would be in a better position.

No one from our team meets that description.

Yet.

Gundogan did a job for City last season. I wish Kova or Jorgi could ever do something like that. The lack of goal threat has been there since Sarri. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, robsblubot said:

either get someone like Haaland or don't break what we have.

Inclined to agree with that but how willing are the club and Tuchel as well as Abraham to reconcile with one another? Hardly a secret that they've been shopping him around. Wonder if it's better to maybe get a non-expensive backup that Tuchel rates as opposed to one that he doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Blue Armour said:

I dont think it's really about having a striker, but about having a consistent goal threat. If we had someone even from midfield filling that description, we would be in a better position.

No one from our team meets that description.

Yet.

Bingo. City have Gündogan, Sterling, Mahrez, KDB, etc who all chip in with decent goal hauls. Liverpool have had the two-headed monster who each scored for fun over the past few seasons.

We get ZERO goal contributions from any of our 3 CM’s, Mount doesn’t score often, and our wingers were all subpar last season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Bingo. City have Gündogan, Sterling, Mahrez, KDB, etc who all chip in with decent goal hauls. Liverpool have had the two-headed monster who each scored for fun over the past few seasons.

We get ZERO goal contributions from any of our 3 CM’s, Mount doesn’t score often, and our wingers were all subpar last season.

 

If Werner and Havertz both score 20 each this season, we will laugh even if we don't get Haaland. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Styl1994 said:

If city gets Kane and we don’t get a striker board have failed to back a successful manager once again. 

Tonight a lot of noise over Kane to City.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You