Jump to content

Callum Wilson


 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, OhForAGreavsie said:

Yes, it is definitely about buying the best. The thing is, you have to be able to tell the difference between the best and the shiniest.

All the best are shiny!

What grade of shiny?

nah lads look at liverpool

shaqiri was 13m list goes on

also about getting the best out of players

Unless we get a new owner we won't be buying worldies, agents are parasites and ffp to name a few reasons

next they will kill loan market

leicester have shown us all its not about £100m players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 3 weeks later...
1 hour ago, Magic Lamps said:

rather wilson than Arnautovic IMO but both are not good enough. i wouldn't take them for anything more than a free. the rumoured 50m are madness and the deal will never be this big but wilson is at least hg.

Also is three years younger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ChelseaFanUK said:

Don't think it means anything, but Solanke to Bournemouth for 19m is done deal.  Wilson to Chelsea rumour will hot up now, people putting 2 and 2 together

Solanke's a Defoe replacement (the latter's going/gone to Rangers)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/3/2019 at 6:09 PM, Magic Lamps said:

rather wilson than Arnautovic IMO but both are not good enough. i wouldn't take them for anything more than a free. the rumoured 50m are madness and the deal will never be this big but wilson is at least hg.

The club is beyond stupid if they go after those two for 50m. 50m man. 

We are in dire need for new striker, but thing is we should rather pay 100m on someone who is actualy top instead of forking 50m on those average ones and then splash 50m in summer again.

Will the club realise that paying big on average players is the worst possible solution? Either pay huge and get actual quality or go for bargains, hope it works.

If reports are true, Pool is looking after Werner who might cost only 40m, yet we will end up with someone crappier and pay more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jason said:

Bournemouth are probably signing Solanke to replace Defoe, who's going to Rangers. Not every club do the '1 out, 1 in' like us...

Not sure that Bournemouth is ready to spend 19M on player just to be Defoe replacement. He was their 4th striker... 

Solanke is injured so I think that Bournemouth are gettin ready to sell Wilson in summer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jernej93 said:

Not sure that Bournemouth is ready to spend 19M on player just to be Defoe replacement. He was their 4th striker... 

Solanke is injured so I think that Bournemouth are gettin ready to sell Wilson in summer. 

To be honest, I'd not read too much into the price tag, certainly not when the prices are getting more inflated in the market these days. I mean, look at City. They have like 50-60 million player sitting on the bench almost every week!

And anyway, don't Bournemouth only have 2 main strikers in Wilson and Josh King? Mousset has barely played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...