closed Chelsea 1-2 Crystal Palace

[MrExcalibur100 7,124]

Just now, Henrique said:

By this logic you could said one day ago that Crystal palace was a massive game, because "if we lost to Palace, and will face City with 'only' 7 points, then City might beat us, then the gap will be 4 points, then if x happen, and y happen....". 

Game against City is not more massive than other games. Gap is 7 points, if City win, gap will be 4 points, still a HUGE gap in such competitive run. We are not talking about a game where if City win, City will be one the top of the lague. The goal is not to maintain a 10 point gap, but to be at the top of the table at the end of the league. A 10 point gap means you can get bad results like this one against Palace AND lost to a difficult opponent like City, and still keep a more or less confortable lead.

City have players like Aguero, Silva, De Bruyne, Sterling and Sane in their starting line-up. Matic is getting the run around by the likes of Puncheon. It's logical I'm a bit concerned they can beat us (and Arsenal who is in disarray). 

[Jase 43,479]

People seem to have forgotten that City gave us a runaround back at the Etihad Stadium. They should have won the game but we only won thanks to some clinical counter attacks and catastrophic defending from them. Palace rode their luck against us today and I think we're need to do the same in some ways on Wednesday.

[Pizy 18,917]

Watch Palace now go and get hammered 3-0 midweek against Southampton, too. 

[Jase 43,479]

10 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Know everyone's criticizing Costa and rightly so, but some others had shockers as well. I though Pedro was poor and I think that may have been David Luiz's worst performance this season. He lunged in seemingly 5 times trying to knick in front of a pass and completely missed it. Hazard was completely untouchable in the first half but then kind of went off the boil. Cesc didn't really do much in the second half either.

Do people really expect Pedro to do well at WB? Yeah, he scored a few goals from that position in the FA Cup but he's never fully convinced and was even given the runaround by Wolves. Asking him to do it in the Premier League, even at home, is suicidal, especially against the likes of Zaha, Puncheon etc. And not to mention, it was so awkward watching him trying to beat players from wide areas. Said this from last season, he's never looked comfortable when asked to do. Surprised Conte didn't play Willian at WB instead.

[Pizy 18,917]

Just now, Jason said:

Do people really expect Pedro to do well at WB? Yeah, he scored a few goals from that position in the FA Cup but he's never fully convinced and was even given the runaround by Wolves. Asking him to do it in the Premier League, even at home, is suicidal, especially against the likes of Zaha, Puncheon etc. And not to mention, it was so awkward watching him trying to beat players from wide areas. Said this from last season, he's never looked comfortable when asked to do. Surprised Conte didn't play Willian at WB instead.

Not his defending as a wing back I'm criticizing. He really wasn't troubled much in that respect since we on the front foot nearly the entire 90. It's the fact that he got in to promising position after promising position and didn't deliver. Don't remember him even having a go at goal either.

[cosmicway 1,333]

One penalty denied in the first half.
There was no aerial power, essential in this type of situation.
Costa missed twice, the one was dead easy for him.
Now it becomes a thriller.

[Azpinator 2,325]

So what exactly does Costa have to do to be dropped? He was so insufferable to watch.

[Jase 43,479]

1 minute ago, Pizy said:

Not his defending as a wing back I'm criticizing. He really wasn't troubled much in that respect since we on the front foot nearly the entire 90. It's the fact that he got in to promising position after promising position and didn't deliver. Don't remember him even having a go at goal either.

Like I said, do you expect him to perform better while playing at WB? As one of the front 3 attackers, he doesn't really have to beat players and can focus on linking up and finishing chances. It's a different story altogether when playing him at WB - he's had to constantly beat players (which is not his strength) and stay out wide as opposed to coming inside and playing to his strengths.

[Jase 43,479]

5 minutes ago, Mana said:

...And having a different Costa to the one we are having now.

Costa plays a key part in our games and he hasn't been the same since China.

Things change. Just because we beat City then when we looked invincible, doesn't mean it's routine especially when some individuals are not the same since we last met City.

Just hope Hazard turns up again on Wednesday because he is critical.

The whole team needs to turn up, not just Hazard. We won't beat City if we only 2-3 players on their game and the rest go AWOL.

[Pizy 18,917]

3 minutes ago, Jason said:

Like I said, do you expect him to perform better while playing at WB? As one of the front 3 attackers, he doesn't really have to beat players and can focus on linking up and finishing chances. It's a different story altogether when playing him at WB - he's had to constantly beat players (which is not his strength) and stay out wide as opposed to coming inside and playing to his strengths.

He was essentially a winger today. Similar job today as he normally has. He was forward most of the time and only had a bit of defending to do which he has done most matches anyways. Don't think it was his position that was the issue today. Just that he wasn't decisive enough when he got into great positions.

This is the reason someone like Sanchez would take us to a whole new level. He'd have scored 3 today if he were in some of the positions we were in.

[Jase 43,479]

1 minute ago, Pizy said:

He was essentially a winger today. Similar job today as he normally has. He was forward most of the time and only had a bit of defending to do which he has done most matches anyways. Don't think it was his position that was the issue today. Just that he wasn't decisive enough when he got into great positions.

This is the reason someone like Sanchez would take us to a whole new level. He'd have scored 3 today if he were in some of the positions we were in.

Disagree. He's more like an inside forward when playing at the front - less focus on creating, more on linking up and finishing. Bloody different to when his task is primarily to create from wide areas.

[Jase 43,479]

4 league defeats this season. All 4 in London. Weird...

[Jase 43,479]

2 minutes ago, Jason said:

4 league defeats this season. All 4 in London. Weird...

+

Palace hadn't picked up a point and scored a goal in a London derby this season before today...

[AlesJuve 264]

1 hour ago, xPetrCechx said:

 

[xPetrCechx 13,571]

1 minute ago, AlesJuve said:

 

But why before city and manu?!

[Special Juan 28,141]

I have never seen so many doom mongers come out of the woodwork....It's as if you thrive on defeat.

[Johnnyeye 7,510]

fair play to Palace, today just wasnt our day, but we were farking playing at home, i expect this kind of result away against Palace, but never at home. Hope Conte gives this lot a huge kick up the arse, today the team was a mess, this needs to be a wake up call, because there still a lot do to, title race is far from over, can´t farking relax.

[AlesJuve 264]

Just now, xPetrCechx said:

But why before city and manu?!

The gods of football so decided. Without national you'd never lost this match.

 

[Johnnyeye 7,510]

shit, with these stats one has to wonder how the fark did we lose today, we couldn´t even salvage a draw, thats football for you, you can pay for your mistakes, Hennessy had a blinder, shit happens. oh and one more thing, fark you Palace, just fark off

[Johnnyeye 7,510]

Just now, Mana said:

*Chelsea scores*
Chelsea: Wow, this looks it's going to be another easy day for us.
Crystal Palace: APRIL FOOLS!
*Chelsea gets pie on their faces and Palace scores twice*

That's how they beat us.

well put, couldnt have said it better, April farking fools´s day