Jump to content

Everyone Laugh At Juventus' New Emblem Thread


Spike
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I just realized the inside J is half of the scudetto badge. It confused me because they use that same symbol for the J on "Juventus".

Are they going to get rid of the stars above the crest? That could be even more controversial.

I don't think it's a bad badge. It just goes completely against their current one, which IMO is the best one they've had. It's a classic style that doesn't even look dated.

juventus-badge-creat.jpg?w=748&h=498&cro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand Atletico and City wanting to change theirs. A new look to go with a new era. It's one of the reasons we changed the centenary year. But Juventus' badge is one of the most recognizable in the world with Barca, Real, Bayern, and United.

I'm pretty confident ours won't be changed. Let's just hope that Nike don't convince the club that opening the new stadium is a perfect time to give the club a "new look". I think ours is one of the best in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand Atletico and City wanting to change theirs. A new look to go with a new era. It's one of the reasons we changed the centenary year. But Juventus' badge is one of the most recognizable in the world with Barca, Real, Bayern, and United.
I'm pretty confident ours won't be changed. Let's just hope that Nike don't convince the club that opening the new stadium is a perfect time to give the club a "new look". I think ours is one of the best in the world.



Nike can fuck themselves in that case. We are a football club not a clothing/merchandise brand company.

What Juventus did is very out of order. They want to change their FC to Football Company.

Hope Milan and Inter come back to the top ASAP so they can kick those arrogant burglars' asses.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/01/2017 at 8:38 PM, lucio said:

terrible. We got away with changing our at the right time.

City's is awful too, when they are about to become a big global club. they change to a piece of trash

Thats why City changed their logo. The former one was TERRIBLE. That eagle with 3 stars looked like something from a USA military department or a logo created by teenagers for they Call of Duty "e-sports" team. That was easily the most "non football" badge in Premier League. In terms of design the new City badge is one of the most good looking ones in Europe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/01/2017 at 7:36 PM, kmk108 said:

I can understand Atletico and City wanting to change theirs. A new look to go with a new era. It's one of the reasons we changed the centenary year. But Juventus' badge is one of the most recognizable in the world with Barca, Real, Bayern, and United.

I'm pretty confident ours won't be changed. Let's just hope that Nike don't convince the club that opening the new stadium is a perfect time to give the club a "new look". I think ours is one of the best in the world.

It doesnt make any sense to talk about changing Chelsea badge at this point. The current one was introduced in 2005, so its like 12 years old and its perfect and fine, and thats why it was created, since the old one was bad and flat, and looked like something made on Windows 95 paint.

Current one is already a modern badge. I think you wont find a better "logo" in European football than current Chelsea one. So lets not start a talk about any chance of the current badge getting a change in the next 30 years or so.

Juventus logo is not a bad "logo", but I think its bad football badge. I've heard some interviews of people behind the design, and it seems it reflects whats behind people running Juventus: they want to make "Juventus" a brand beyond football.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/new-juventus-crest-more-just-9643877

This logo is perfect for this purpose, since its not a "football looking" badge, if you know what I mean. In my opinion Juventus is missing the point here. Ok, every big club want to become "global brands", but they are global football brands in first place. Think about big sports franchises in USA. They don't think beyond the sports. Of course they want to make money as much as possible, for example selling casual clothing, but that casual clothing still will feature some kind of association with a sports. The best way to Juventus think outside football in my opinion, was creating a secondary logo, just like NBA teams, where you get a primary logo, partial logo, secondary logo "a" and secondary logo "b". Those "logos" are used in different situations. In my books changing your football badge to think "beyond football" is not a good idea, since changes in badges should be made to reinforce the football brand, and not the opposite. For example, Arsenal, Chelsea and City are very good examples of teams that had former bad/outdated badges and needed new ones, but the current badges of those teams are "football badges". You look at them and you know you are looking at football teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our current one will stay for a long time. Since Abramovich's Chelsea created this one, I think it'll stay at least until he's gone.

This just caught me by surprise, as I still see them as one of the top clubs in the world. But I guess Italian football has lost a lot o popularity over the last decade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbf the old juve crest was hideous as well. Looked like a barcode. The new one is more like some label of a surfing/skating themed youth fashion brand my little brother would buy to appear cool until realising that pretending to be a skater or surfer when you are neither is about the least cool thing possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be ok if Juve was playing in china.

But for such big brand that Juve is, its against the tradition and football without the tradition is nothing. 

In general, many things in football is turning into shit. Sure it takes time to get used to it and definately it has alot to do with nostalgy, but I think older crests are nicer. Current City is awful, too plain and yet too much going on without any meaning. Atletico one is very similar to current, so it gets a pass.

Then you have PL logo. The old one was much much better than new one, which looks as if it was designed by feminist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You