xPetrCechx 13,582 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rapkun 668 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 34 minutes ago, xPetrCechx said: They're quoting The Telegraph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milka 3,398 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 2 hours ago, Magic Lamps said: also who is Alexandro? Alex Sandro I prefer Leo Bonucci to Chelsea . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rapkun 668 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 http://www.goal.com/en-sg/news/3875/transfer-zone/2017/06/24/36579992/ake-could-make-way-for-van-dijk-at-chelsea Article is from Nizaar Kinsella who's a Chelsea correspondent for Goal. He gives very little updates but is generally well informed about Chelsea. He says that the deal is far from being done. I'm inclined to believe him because I don't think negotitations with Southampton are going to be easy following their statement about Liverpool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitr 488 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 3 minutes ago, Rapkun said: http://www.goal.com/en-sg/news/3875/transfer-zone/2017/06/24/36579992/ake-could-make-way-for-van-dijk-at-chelsea Article is from Nizaar Kinsella who's a Chelsea correspondent for Goal. He gives very little updates but is generally well informed about Chelsea. He says that the deal is far from being done. I'm inclined to believe him because I don't think negotitations with Southampton are going to be easy following after their statement about Liverpool. Goal is not a good source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rapkun 668 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Just now, Dimitr said: Goal is not a good source I know. but that guy is generally reliable when it comes to Chelsea. Di Marzio only reported that we bid for him anyway not that it was done. Southampton being interested in Ake is not new either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitr 488 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 10 minutes ago, Rapkun said: I know. but that guy is generally reliable when it comes to Chelsea. Di Marzio only reported that we bid for him anyway not that it was done. Southampton being interested in Ake is not new either. We will see . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AK-3001 286 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 DiMarzio hasn't been too accurate himself. Said Tolisso to Chelsea was really close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clockwork 1,794 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 1 hour ago, AK-3001 said: DiMarzio hasn't been too accurate himself. Said Tolisso to Chelsea was really close. At one point VVD signing with Liverpool and City looked like a certainty. Now with Chelsea. Yeah I would be very weary of the accuracy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseaFanUK 1,014 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 Nizaar Kinsella is in no way reliable. At all. If you want a laugh, twitter search 'van dijk chelsea' and read some of the panic and meltdown of the scousers. It's hilarious The ones like 'chelsea bidding is good, we match it, they cant sign him because he wants us'. They forgetting the public statement that any interest is over???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pHaRaOn 2,131 Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 5 hours ago, AK-3001 said: DiMarzio hasn't been too accurate himself. Said Tolisso to Chelsea was really close. That's not true. Di Marzio never said that Chelsea were close to Tolisso. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzy_Vance 454 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 25 minutes ago, pHaRaOn said: That's not true. Di Marzio never said that Chelsea were close to Tolisso. Di Marzio has been unreliable lately though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitr 488 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 Southampton have put a £65M price tag on Virgil van Dijk which is proving to be a major stumbling block for Chelsea. [Yahoo Sport] #LFC. Sadly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitr 488 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 Big faoul for di marzio ,big . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitr 488 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 I believe her 😍😁 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dahnald 256 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 Liverpool fans already branding VVD as a snake for choosing Chelsea. Deluded bunch. Klopp and Liverpool probably contacted him about a move to 'Pool and he might've said yes because from Southampton to Liverpool is a step forward. He's a pro. If Chelsea come knocking and pay Soton and Van Dijk he's off to us. Still do not see it happening. Southampton want to quit being a feeder team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,582 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 2 minutes ago, Dahnald said: Liverpool fans already branding VVD as a snake for choosing Chelsea. Deluded bunch. Klopp and Liverpool probably contacted him about a move to 'Pool and he might've said yes because from Southampton to Liverpool is a step forward. He's a pro. If Chelsea come knocking and pay Soton and Van Dijk he's off to us. Still do not see it happening. Southampton want to quit being a feeder team. but for the right price.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyikolajevics 2,713 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 45 minutes ago, Dahnald said: Still do not see it happening. Southampton want to quit being a feeder team. Of course they do but it's not that simple. Van Dijk is a top player, he wants to play for a top club and earn good money. Southampton can't keep him forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rapkun 668 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 I don't think Di Marzio has become unreliable but him and the journalists/columnists that work with him are speeding up things and misleading people. For instance, they reported that we bid for Van Dijk and use "Van Dijk is closer to Chelsea" as a title for the article. Yet there was no mention of an agreement and nothing to suggest a deal was close. Obviously they're trying to attract more readers as do all journalists and people jump too quick to conclusions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pHaRaOn 2,131 Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 1 hour ago, Rapkun said: I don't think Di Marzio has become unreliable but him and the journalists/columnists that work with him are speeding up things and misleading people. For instance, they reported that we bid for Van Dijk and use "Van Dijk is closer to Chelsea" as a title for the article. Yet there was no mention of an agreement and nothing to suggest a deal was close. Obviously they're trying to attract more readers as do all journalists and people jump too quick to conclusions. True. Sometimes it's not even Di Marzio who mislead the people, but their misinterpretation. Di Marzio may just report early stages of deals, say "Club A have contacted Club B for a player C" and people are going like "OMG, it's happening, Di Marzio said that!", while in fact he only reported contacts. And then they blame him if deal doesn't go through and call him unreliable. He's still the best in the business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts