Emanuele Giaccherini

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

Giaccherini's agent: "Conte admires Giaccherini a lot and #CFC would be a dream. But it is still too early to talk about his future" (cm)

Giaccherini's representative: "After the Euros, who wants to can buy him from Sunderland for a figure which is not too high" #CFC #SAFC (cm)

 

[petre.ispirescu 4,928]

Imagine the first match at the Bridge against West Ham with Giaccherini and Oscar as midfielders 

[Pizy 18,855]

Utterly shit player. Would be a joke of a signing.

[nyikolajevics 2,690]

11 minutes ago, petre.ispirescu said:

Imagine the first match at the Bridge against West Ham with Giaccherini and Oscar as midfielders 

Giaccherini - Oscar - Pedro

 

All the way to the League 1.

[!Hazard! 3,394]

Is he so dominant that he deserves two topics? In that case, sign him up

[Blue_Fox_ 2,086]

If Conte wants him and has a use for him in his system I don't see why not.
I would prefer some better signings, but the boy know how to work hard and understands what Conte wants from him. As a plus he humiliated Courtois and the Belgian defence.

[BlueLyon 9,359]

1 hour ago, Blue_Fox_ said:

If Conte wants him and has a use for him in his system I don't see why not.
I would prefer some better signings, but the boy know how to work hard and understands what Conte wants from him. As a plus he humiliated Courtois and the Belgian defence.

I would not take him even for free tbh. He is decent for italy team, maybe because of passion toward the country, but thats that. He is old, he would add nothing to the Chelsea realy. Just because he works hard is not reason to get him. He should first be useful in some area for us and his work rate would be bonus. But I dont see anyhow he would be usefull for us.

Maybe because he speaks italian and knows Conte. But that should not be the cause to sign him lol

[It's too big 625]

I could see him as a Milner esque player for us. He is 30/31, so hardly going to be a first team fixture I wouldn't have thought. 

[Blue_Fox_ 2,086]

3 hours ago, BlueLyon said:

He should first be useful in some area for us and his work rate would be bonus. But I dont see anyhow he would be usefull for us.

Maybe because he speaks italian and knows Conte. But that should not be the cause to sign him lol

Isn't that what i wrote though?

[Spike 12,049]

Considering he can play just about any position and wouldn't be a starter I'd take him. Nothing wrong with a utility player.

[Tomo 21,751]

The Talk Chelsea transfer system

Are they world class?

If no, slate the board as clueless, demand Emenalo be sacked and scream the club ain't got a clue.

If yes carry on.

Are they under 30?

If no, slate the board as clueless, demand Emenalo be sacked and say the club don't have a clue and are short-sighted.

If yes carry on

Do they cost over £25m?

If no, slate the board for penny pinching, say they only care about profits, squeeze fuck off Emenalo in there somewhere too.

If yes, then all is good, for now................

[Tomo 21,751]

11 hours ago, petre.ispirescu said:

Imagine the first match at the Bridge against West Ham with Giaccherini and Oscar as midfielders 

If he was going to be a starter then 100% I agree would be horrendous, however look at Fergie with say Cleverly, hes been a complete joke under other manager's but under Fergie he worked, maybe Giaccherini is one of them for Conte. I mean is he really any worse than Jarosik? who Jose signed as a squad player in our title winning season.

A utility player who knows Conte and his management inside out, could be worse.

[bellion 170]

2 hours ago, Tomo said:

The Talk Chelsea transfer system

Are they world class?

If no, slate the board as clueless, demand Emenalo be sacked and scream the club ain't got a clue.

If yes carry on.

Are they under 30?

If no, slate the board as clueless, demand Emenalo be sacked and say the club don't have a clue and are short-sighted.

If yes carry on

Do they cost over £25m?

If no, slate the board for penny pinching, say they only care about profits, squeeze fuck off Emenalo in there somewhere too.

If yes, then all is good, for now................

How the mighty has fallen.

From the likes of Vidal to meek acceptance and approval of a Sunderland reject.

Were you celebrating when Djilobdoji, Hector and Pato were signed? 

 

[bellion 170]

13 hours ago, nyikolajevics said:

Giaccherini - Oscar - Pedro

 

All the way to the League 1.

It's just agent talk.  Take it as empty chatter and nothing more. 

[Spike 12,049]

25 minutes ago, bellion said:

How the mighty has fallen.

From the likes of Vidal to meek acceptance and approval of a Sunderland reject.

Were you celebrating when Djilobdoji, Hector and Pato were signed? 

 

What on earth are you talking about? This is a complete false equivalency. Vidal would have been signed as a first team starter, Giaccherini as depth and cover. Comparing the two situations, players and scenarios is completely asinine and beyond pointless. Signing one doesn't negate the signing of the other, as earlier they would fulfil different needs.

Next I'll be bloody well told that squad depth like Belletti was a terrible transfer.