The Mourinho Thread

[flyll 5]

Love,love,love Jose Mourinho!

Brilliant manager and a fantastic character!

[xPetrCechx 13,570]

[Fulham Broadway 17,299]

Jose Arroganto

[Ankit 3,176]

What the fuck?

[gary gordon 1,777]

I remember seeing this a few years back. I'll never forgot Jose. The way he stuck up for his lads was amazing. The fans and the boys absolutely loved him.

[Milan 17,955]

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/4728122/Jose-Mourinho-world-exclusive.html

[gary gordon 1,777]

Always provoking, love him..

[MADEZ 9]

1 like for mourihno,always defending his beloved sons.

[Alex89 1]

am I the only person who thinks if jose mourinho comes back to england next year (he said he is going to return and he's leaving madrid after this season) he will choose chelsea??

[Spike 12,049]

I've been thinling about it lately...Would Mourinho returning be a good thing? He loves the physical and dominating tactics with players like Khedira, Makélelé, Essien, Mikel being important. Whereas CFC are seemingly trying to move away from that ethos and implementing a more technical and fleet footed style. Wouldn't it be counter productive to bring in a manager whose entire philosophy is at ends with the players that are being signed?

[nachikethas 1,154]

am I the only person who thinks if jose mourinho comes back to england next year (he said he is going to return and he's leaving madrid after this season) he will choose chelsea??

i not sure but i want that to happen :blue scalf:

[Ramzi 233]

I've been thinling about it lately...Would Mourinho returning be a good thing? He loves the physical and dominating tactics with players like Khedira, Makélelé, Essien, Mikel being important. Whereas CFC are seemingly trying to move away from that ethos and implementing a more technical and fleet footed style. Wouldn't it be counter productive to bring in a manager whose entire philosophy is at ends with the players that are being signed?

But do Real Madrid play physical football?? (I don't watch them much)

[Spike 12,049]

But do Real Madrid play physical football?? (I don't watch them much)

To an extent yes.

Khedira

Alonso

Arbeloa

Essien

Marcelo

Ramos

Pepe

Carvalho

Are all very physical players.

A lot of Merengues complain about José's stlye of football. Stating that it's too negative and it's detrimental to the image of the club.

[Ankit 3,176]

I've been thinling about it lately...Would Mourinho returning be a good thing? He loves the physical and dominating tactics with players like Khedira, Makélelé, Essien, Mikel being important. Whereas CFC are seemingly trying to move away from that ethos and implementing a more technical and fleet footed style. Wouldn't it be counter productive to bring in a manager whose entire philosophy is at ends with the players that are being signed?

Exactly what i have been thinking. The kind of players we have right now in our squad and the kinds of player we are being linked with makes me believe we are shifting towards the so called 'sexy football' which will with all due respect isn't what Jose Mourinho team does. I voted for Pep in the other thread of who should be our next manager because this present team needs a coach like Pep more than Jose.

[Ramzi 233]

To an extent yes.

Khedira

Alonso

Arbeloa

Essien

Marcelo

Ramos

Pepe

Carvalho

Are all very physical players.

A lot of Merengues complain about José's stlye of football. Stating that it's too negative and it's detrimental to the image of the club.

Thanks. However, doesn't it seem that our team fits this build?? All those players you mentioned are either defenders or midfielders, I understand that maybe some players might have been left out of that list but we have Azpi, Cahill, Luiz, Mikel, Ramires, Ba, Lampard, Moses, and even Oscar who all seem to either reflect that mentality or seem to have the physical build to withstand that style. Could it be that Mourinho's system mainly requires Aggressive defenders, strong midfielders, and a striker capable of holding up the ball(Drogba,Milito, Benzema/Higuain)? All of which it seems we have?