Jump to content

The Mourinho Thread


Fulham Broadway
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mourinho closes the offensive hose at 3-0 because he feels there is no need to further tire the players (and risk an injury) over a game that is already won. He does it strategically thinking about the next game. Would I rather win 3-0 now and 2-0 the next, or work for 5-0 here and reduce the player's form for the next? Would I rather give the club's fans another 30 minutes of attacking fun or the title at the end of the season?

That's the difference between having a manager used to winning Championships and one that has never won anything in his career.

Does that answer your question?

It'd be less tiring to casually attack though than to defend as you're able to dictate the tempo of the game. Just ask Barcelona!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jose talks about last night´s failure to divert attention from players, I read above.

Then, I would like to ask..does his talk about Citeh winning the PL helps Chelsea´s players ?

Yes. It puts less pressure on players, 75% of whom have no experience winning it.

Just a quick question I'd like to ask you all?

Liverpool were leading 4-0 at home to Everton and went on the hunt for more,

while when we were leading 3-0 against United (or lead in any game) we decide to shut up shop rather than hunt for more. Why all this negativity?

Because United is not Everton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mourinho closes the offensive hose at 3-0 because he feels there is no need to further tire the players (and risk an injury) over a game that is already won. He does it strategically thinking about the next game. Would I rather win 3-0 now and 2-0 the next, or work for 5-0 here and reduce the player's form for the next? Would I rather give the club's fans another 30 minutes of attacking fun or the title at the end of the season?

That's the difference between having a manager used to winning Championships and one that has never won anything in his career.

Does that answer your question?

Quite possibly one of the greatest posts I've read on this forum. You've restored my faith in Talk Chelsea

It'd be less tiring to casually attack though than to defend as you're able to dictate the tempo of the game. Just ask Barcelona!

We don't have the passing ability that they did, Our approach is direct, running at defences and we are very dangerous from set pieces. For us to keep going and going would tire out our players incredibly. I really fancy us to get something Monday night, and I'll hold my hands up and say I was wrong if we don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today, Jose claimed Citeh could hit Chelsea for 5 or 6 goals in Monday´s title crunch.

Since we know Jose likes to play with the UK media but how does this drivel helps the players is beyond me.

Meanwhile, Cahill insists Chelsea can go to the Etihad & win - & have no intention of trying to shut up shop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else hear José talking about our striker situation just then?

Said something like "Everyone questions why we don't bring in a striker now, but you'll understand in the summer. We know what we want, but it's impossible in January."

That gives me a boner! He must have someone BIG in mind.

Messi ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mourinho hints at City swipe over Financial Fair Play rules

Sportsmail's Matt Barlow reports: 'Jose Mourinho took a thinly-veiled swipe at Manchester City’s 'dodgy' approach to the transfer market as the January window swung shut.

'Without mentioning Monday’s opponents by name, Mourinho claimed not all clubs were showing the same commitment to UEFA’s Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations as others.

'Mourinho said: 'Some clubs are feeling FFP as a fair FFP, and some others are feeling FFP as a dodgy FFP,' said Mourinho.

''We don’t want emergency plans, it’s not our profile now. The players we're signing now are the right ones for our future: Matic, Salah, Zouma, a young kid for the future.''

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going back to the stadium expansion discussion, it is virtually impossible to expand Stamford Bridge and if we did it wouldn't be cost effective given the logistics behind it. The only chance we have is if we can put more pressure on the council during the elections or keep threatening to move away from the borough. New stadium is pretty much the only solution

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else hear José talking about our striker situation just then?

Said something like "Everyone questions why we don't bring in a striker now, but you'll understand in the summer. We know what we want, but it's impossible in January."

That gives me a boner! He must have someone BIG in mind.

IBRA!!!!!!!!!!

He loves Mou, is always up for a challenge, hasnt

played the EPL.

Ibra and Lukaku. muahahah..

BLACK AND DECKER BITCHES

(not being racist)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You