Would loosing Lampard be a Blessing in Disguise?

[the wes 7,212]

ON a positive note, there is a sense of calmness with the club regarding Lampards contract. They are showing the similar attitude they showed when they went about securing the manager, and thats getting the work done without making too much fuss about it in the media .

I am sure Lampard will get his contract sorted out and shut the trap of these media personnel.

i hope your right m8 think about it is putting my head away

[TylerCFC 7]

Goal.com has reported more of the same. Hope its false though.

http://www.goal.com/en-US/articolo.aspx?contenutoid=754960

[manpe 10,855]

http://www.transfermarketweb.com/?action=r...amp;idsel=19520

Every newspaper is saying it (except for the quite trustworthy ones, skysports and eurosport)... I sooooooo fucking hope this isn't true. Lampard, you promised us that you wouldn't leave. If you don't keep your word, you're not a man !

I still trust Lampsy, he wouldn't lie to us. When he said that he sounded sincere. Please oh please God (if you exist).

If Chelsea doesn't release a statement soon, then this is true.

Edited June 28, 2008 by manpe

[Kez 2,727]

I'm not liking how many reports i've seen on this & Chelsea have not released a statement denying it.

I'm getting really worried.

Edited June 28, 2008 by Kez

[the wes 7,212]

I'm not liking how many reports i've seen on this & Chelsea have not released a statement denying it.

I'm getting really worried.

me too m8

[misschief 24]

http://www.transfermarketweb.com/?action=r...amp;idsel=19520

Every newspaper is saying it (except for the quite trustworthy ones, skysports and eurosport)... I sooooooo fucking hope this isn't true. Lampard, you promised us that you wouldn't leave. If you don't keep your word, you're not a man !

I still trust Lampsy, he wouldn't lie to us. When he said that he sounded sincere. Please oh please God (if you exist).

If Chelsea doesn't release a statement soon, then this is true.

He wasn't sincere. At the end of the day, most of them are in it for the money these days, Lampard's no different.

[manpe 10,855]

He wasn't sincere. At the end of the day, most of them are in it for the money these days, Lampard's no different.

I really hoped he was different. I'm gutted if my idol isn't

[the wes 7,212]

the rumour is that Chelsea offer him a two year contract looks like he wants a longer contract thats why hasn't signed a new contract

[Stamford 3]

Remember guy's its all just rumours at the moment, so lets not judge the guy until an official announcements been made.

[TexasChelseaFan 0]

The word I'm hearing now is that Chelsea want to keep Lamps.

Edited June 28, 2008 by TexasChelseaFan

[misschief 24]

Chelsea have never said any different, this has always been about Lampard not agreeing a deal.

[Milan 17,835]

"Chelsea will not let go of Lampard without a fight"

http://www.channel4.com/sport/football_italia/jun29d.html

Chelsea will hold Frank Lampard to the final year of his contract rather than sell him - whatever the price

http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/sport/footba...98487-20625414/

Edited June 29, 2008 by milan.cech

[BlueLion. 21,491]

The person who mentioned on the previous page that the way the club are keeping quiet is a good sign. If they had have immediately released a statement saying it was all speculation, I'd be worried. They are going about it VERY professionally. For once.

[manpe 10,855]

The person who mentioned on the previous page that the way the club are keeping quiet is a good sign. If they had have immediately released a statement saying it was all speculation, I'd be worried. They are going about it VERY professionally. For once.

That can be true. Hopefully it will be taken care of after he's talked to Scolari. When I finally see titles "Lampsy signs a new contract", you won't believe the relief

[Kez 2,727]

Hopefully scolari can talk some sense into him

[the wes 7,212]

Sources close to Stamford Bridge suggest that Chelsea will dump Frank Lampard in the reserves for a year rather than allow him to join Inter Milan.

Lampard has been linked with a move to Inter Milan for several weeks now, following the appointment of former Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho as the new boss of the Italian champions.

France Football claimed on Friday that Lampard had signed a four-year contract with Inter, worth €7.3m a year, and that the Nerazzurri would pay Chelsea a transfer fee of €9m.

This deal has not become official yet though, and there are reports emanating from Stamford Bridge that Chelsea are fighting tooth and nail to prevent the player from leaving.

Indeed it is even said that if Lampard refuses to sign a new contract in West London, Chelsea could decide to let the player rot in the reserves for a year until his contract expires in 2009. Lampard would then be able to leave on a Bosman transfer as he would be a free agent.

Inter have made the signing of a top class attacking midfielder their summer priority, and they are also believed to be on the verge of capturing FC Porto star Ricardo Quaresma.

Goal.com

[Yan Dylan 0]

Despite i love him so much, i wouldn't like to hold him over his unwilling will.

If a player wants to go, there's the door, the club is more important than a player, and i'm before all a Chelsea Fan.

If he wants to stay, there's no problem.

Now, we have to wait, Que Sera Sera !

[Kez 2,727]

We're better off selling him rather than leaving him to rot in the reserves and get nothing for him