Jump to content

Theo Walcott


Jase
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

He was very good before getting injured last season. I was finally impressed by him; good movement, and finished like a striker.

But he looks off the pace right now, which happens when players return from a long lay-off. Worth the gamble for a reasonable fee imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO apart from a new CB and maybe an AM our first XI is settled already. But we have lacked depth this season, so Walcott could be a possibility. Natural RW with pace and decent technique, socres goals, perfect age, really decent squad player. most importantly he is homegrown. I just wonder if we don't have enough average wingers in the squad already:kakuta, piazon, Traore, atsu, cuadrado, willian etc. I will never understand why we loan and sell our own players to fund moves for players of the same position who are not any better but usually older and overpriced. Schürrle/Salah for Cuadrado, Mata/KDB for Salah/Willian etc. IMO the 4 AMs we got rid of Mata/Salah/KDB/Schürrle as well as the AMs we are going to lose Bertrand/Atsu/Piazon are all 7 better or more talented than Willian/Cuadrado/Walcott.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walcott is right footed too, isn't he?

I was trying to say that Schurrle's natural position on the pitch is LM/LW...I believe we sold him because RW isn't his natural position

On the other hand, Walcott can only play in the RW position.

I would rather give Atsu a chance than pay Walcott 120,000 a week to sit on the bench

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So our old mate rob beasley reckons that big Pete could be sold to arsenal but only if theo or the ox come the other way. I'd personally take either as options to have. Think if cech wants to go to arsenal he should be aloud,guys done everything for us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would much rather the OX he would be better for us younger plays across three behind striker and can play as a CM no.8

Walcott is prolific though when he gets a run of games. Chamberlain has much more injury problems than Walcott as well. Walcott would be more realistic because he has a year left while Arsenal will not entertain selling Chamberlain at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...