Jase 43,479 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 It's from The Times, by the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,187 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 I thought he was dead. Honestly, this is the first I have heard of Theo Walcott in ages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DH1988 1,353 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 No thank you, keep him, years ago yeah but not now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonsFinest 692 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 Won't surprise me. We need players to be HG. And he is a good option, if we are to ship Oscar/Willian and sign Pogba/Koke or whoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 another average player. we have willian, cuadrado for RW. so please no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAB 1,030 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 He is a good squad option imo, for the right price of course. But if this is true then why did we let Schurrle go? ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 our search for a right wing is like Monty Python and the search for the Holy Grail ,,,, just NOT as funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 He was very good before getting injured last season. I was finally impressed by him; good movement, and finished like a striker.But he looks off the pace right now, which happens when players return from a long lay-off. Worth the gamble for a reasonable fee imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kellzfresh 7,229 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 He's english, homegrown, better goalscorer than any right wing players we have Negatives: doesn't track back...I'll rather have chamberlain than him, someone who can actually beat players without needing space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supporter 3,088 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reddish-Blue 2,516 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 He'd be better off going to Liverpool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reddish-Blue 2,516 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 He is a good squad option imo, for the right price of course. But if this is true then why did we let Schurrle go? ...I thought we let Schurrle go because he's not a natural RW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAB 1,030 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 I thought we let Schurrle go because he's not a natural RWWalcott is right footed too, isn't he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Lamps 11,692 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 IMO apart from a new CB and maybe an AM our first XI is settled already. But we have lacked depth this season, so Walcott could be a possibility. Natural RW with pace and decent technique, socres goals, perfect age, really decent squad player. most importantly he is homegrown. I just wonder if we don't have enough average wingers in the squad already:kakuta, piazon, Traore, atsu, cuadrado, willian etc. I will never understand why we loan and sell our own players to fund moves for players of the same position who are not any better but usually older and overpriced. Schürrle/Salah for Cuadrado, Mata/KDB for Salah/Willian etc. IMO the 4 AMs we got rid of Mata/Salah/KDB/Schürrle as well as the AMs we are going to lose Bertrand/Atsu/Piazon are all 7 better or more talented than Willian/Cuadrado/Walcott. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin123 539 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 This planted story means were negotiating for someone else... Seen it so many times!! Sterling?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petre.ispirescu 4,928 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 This planted story means were negotiating for someone else... Seen it so many times!! Sterling??Hope so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reddish-Blue 2,516 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 Walcott is right footed too, isn't he?I was trying to say that Schurrle's natural position on the pitch is LM/LW...I believe we sold him because RW isn't his natural position On the other hand, Walcott can only play in the RW position.I would rather give Atsu a chance than pay Walcott 120,000 a week to sit on the bench Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ulsterchelsea 3,221 Posted May 21, 2015 Share Posted May 21, 2015 So our old mate rob beasley reckons that big Pete could be sold to arsenal but only if theo or the ox come the other way. I'd personally take either as options to have. Think if cech wants to go to arsenal he should be aloud,guys done everything for us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluesman2610 1,423 Posted May 21, 2015 Share Posted May 21, 2015 Would much rather the OX he would be better for us younger plays across three behind striker and can play as a CM no.8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stats 7,156 Posted May 21, 2015 Share Posted May 21, 2015 Would much rather the OX he would be better for us younger plays across three behind striker and can play as a CM no.8Walcott is prolific though when he gets a run of games. Chamberlain has much more injury problems than Walcott as well. Walcott would be more realistic because he has a year left while Arsenal will not entertain selling Chamberlain at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.8fb88d2f3e0e6884a1aa67c4dce82986.jpg)
Recommended Posts