Who Do You Want To Be The Next Manager?

[warnie_666 1,081]

I swear I had to rub my eyes and recheck the statement on skysports saying "Chelsea turn to Spalletti"...I mean WTF. With every passing moment we are going a step backwards. WTF has Spalleti done with Roma.? OK...he has got average sides with limited budget to reach within the top 5 in the leagueEg: Udinese and Roma. So have Martin Oneil, Hughes, Laudrup, Deschamps whohave done excellent work with average sides.

Plus with Spalletti, I remeber the 7-1 drubbing that Man Utd handed out to his team, this when all they had to do was seek a draw at Old Trafford.

Why the fuck arent we going for Zico.? He is with Fenerbache and he did an excellent work there.

Does anyone else agree that Zico would be fantastic for our team.?

[EskWeston 696]

I swear I had to rub my eyes and recheck the statement on skysports saying "Chelsea turn to Spalletti"...I mean WTF. With every passing moment we are going a step backwards. WTF has Spalleti done with Roma.? OK...he has got average sides with limited budget to reach within the top 5 in the leagueEg: Udinese and Roma. So have Martin Oneil, Hughes, Laudrup, Deschamps whohave done excellent work with average sides.

Plus with Spalletti, I remeber the 7-1 drubbing that Man Utd handed out to his team, this when all they had to do was seek a draw at Old Trafford.

Why the fuck arent we going for Zico.? He is with Fenerbache and he did an excellent work there.

Does anyone else agree that Zico would be fantastic for our team.?

You don't want Spalletti but you do want Zico? Spalletti has taken Roma who are in a lot of debt to runners up of the league and picked up a few cups and had some good runs in the CL. He is also liked because he encourages attacking football..... to say he is not good enough on the back of 1 result against united is extremely harsh.

[Gianfranco_Z 202]

Mark Hughes now Man City manager, Another one out of the running. Just hurry up and sign Mancini.

[EskWeston 696]

Mark Hughes now Man City manager, Another one out of the running. Just hurry up and sign Mancini.

Something about Mancini that i just don't fancy!

Rijkaard

Spalletti

Scolari

Mancini

Seems to be down to these 4 now! With Deschamps and Hiddink with outside chances.

[warnie_666 1,081]

You don't want Spalletti but you do want Zico? Spalletti has taken Roma who are in a lot of debt to runners up of the league and picked up a few cups and had some good runs in the CL. He is also liked because he encourages attacking football..... to say he is not good enough on the back of 1 result against united is extremely harsh.

Yes, true...but you gotta compare the team of Roma with the likes of Fenerbache, Aston Villa, Getafe.

Also, Zico took an average Japanese side to the Quarter Finals of the World Cup and an average Fenerbache side to the Quarter Finals of the UCL.

I feel its just a toss of coin between the managers like Spalletti, Martin O Neill, Hughes, Laudrup, Deschamp and if you may add Zico. These managers have the "potential" to be great managers if they are given proper resources. And, as far as I am concerned its like taking a Gamble.

[EskWeston 696]

Why mention Martin O'Neil? You will get everyone worried!!!!

The longer it goes on the more likely it is that we are getting Scolari or even Hiddink, because those are the only ones we will have to wait for because of the Euros.

[warnie_666 1,081]

Why mention Martin O'Neil? You will get everyone worried!!!!

The longer it goes on the more likely it is that we are getting Scolari or even Hiddink, because those are the only ones we will have to wait for because of the Euros.

And by the time Euros is over, we will see most of the top performers in Europe already snatched by othe big clubs.

[misschief 24]

Gutted we let Hughes go to City but the more I look at what Spalletti's done, the more potential I think he's got.

[EskWeston 696]

Gutted we let Hughes go to City but the more I look at what Spalletti's done, the more potential I think he's got.

Yup, Spalletti is an interesting choice thats for sure. Rijkaard or Spalletti over Scolari or Mancini..................

f**k knows what is really going on though, we will probably end up doing something really silly!!

[warnie_666 1,081]

Or probably something really wise, as we are NOT hurrying into this or not Panicking into appointing someone on his past laurels.

[BlueLion. 21,491]

All going well then, and the board dont look incompetent at all.

Luckily I dont think Ancellotti is as good as the press make out -not done much recently -just inherired a brilliant AC squad, bit like Grant, and basically done fuck all with them. Get knocked out by Arsenal.

Cant believe Hughes has decided to go and work for that Thai crook. Oh well.

Now, the club are allegedly turning their attention to Spalletti -he is someone I really rate -dynamic and has done some good things with a limited budget at Roma.

He's a name I'm annoyed at myself for not bringing up. Good call, he did brilliantly at Udinese with no budget at all and has done great things with Roma as well.

[misschief 24]

and has done great things with Roma as well.

Also without much money or major signings.

Edited June 4, 2008 by misschief

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Thats a very fair point. One could argue he inherited a strong squad but he would do the same at Chelsea.

[Stamford 3]

Jesus NO !!! Their even linking us to Rafa the Jafa now. I just couldn't face a Scouse reject at my club. I'll tell you now that I will NEVER walk into Stamford Bridge all the time he is in charge, although I don't know why I am writing this as its obviously bollocks. Well it better be. :ballack:

[misschief 24]

Thats a very fair point. One could argue he inherited a strong squad but he would do the same at Chelsea.

But you wouldnt say the same about Empoli and Udinese and he turned both of them around big time.