Closed Chelsea 2-0 Arsenal

[cosmicway 1,333]

:lol:

Bill Hicock

[Viper22 2,418]

Isn't that what English humor is about? I found it hilarious

Hmm I guess. But the guy's over-riding feelings (it seemed to me from reading it) were that Arsenal and Wenger had done nothing wrong and that the shove (which is classed as assault in a court of law btw), the smoke bombs and flares being let off and Welbeck's challenge were all blown out of proportion and there was nothing wrong with any of them and Chelsea fans were exaggerating them all.

[Laylabelle 9,535]

I dont know what it is about supporters of teams that play in red, but it seems the first mandatory requisite is to look like a fucking freak. Lots about yesterday

Pretty sure when they lost 6-0 they interviewed the most random est/thick fans they could find...

Still bizzare to read Graham Polls comments..we should've had 1 sent off but them 3..not expected

[Fulham Broadway 17,316]

Pretty sure when they lost 6-0 they interviewed the most random est/thick fans they could find...

Still bizzare to read Graham Polls comments..we should've had 1 sent off but them 3..not expected

Poll was always a tart, trying to be best mates with the famous prem stars when refereeing, now hes resorting to 'outrageous' punditry in a sad attempt to still be noticed. Probably.

[Laylabelle 9,535]

Probably.Not sure why he got a column in the first place considering he couldnt count but still a bit ooo.If it was Andy Grey on the other hand probably complete opposite and that Jose should be ashamed for whatever reason

[BlueLion. 21,491]

Exactly, my missus it's actually my own other new home shirt. She got to wear my Hazard shirt and I wore my Fabregas shirt to piss off the Gooner fans

Haha, I saw you on Match of the Day then

[Jase 43,479]

Having watched highlights a few times, how on earth did Martin Atkinson not send Welbeck off for that two-footed challenge on Fabregas is beyond me!

[MrBlueGuy 1,552]

Having watched highlights a few times, how on earth did Martin Atkinson not send Welbeck off for that two-footed challenge on Fabregas is beyond me!

Same reason Cahill stayed on, think he tried to keep 11 men at all cost.

[Jase 43,479]

Same reason Cahill stayed on, think he tried to keep 11 men at all cost.

Welbeck's challenge was more of blatant red card than Cahill's. The latter went in hard with his tackle yes but neither of his studs or even boots made contact with Sanchez, unlike Welbeck's.

[DazLaughlan 55]

Just gets sweeter and sweeter the more they complain about everything other than Wenger and his shit ability at building a balanced squad.

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

Anyone see this? https://vine.co/v/OKHhUuYtqaF

[guddy6969 201]

Anyone see this? https://vine.co/v/OKHhUuYtqaF

I was just going to put that up.....

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

I was just going to put that up.....

I fucking always hated sanchez and this just make me hate him more... such a prick

[Cholo 428]

Well, it's Ars-Anal. What do you expect? From the players to the manager, all are mental and have serious issues and seem to be ill.

[MrExcalibur100 7,124]

Interesting Player Positional Tracker for the game. Ozil tucked inside for majority giving Hazard room to wreck havoc all game against an inexperienced Chambers. Wenger really is tactically clueless.

http://statsbomb.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/CHEvARS.gif

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

Interesting Player Positional Tracker for the game. Ozil tucked inside for majority giving Hazard room to wreck havoc all game against an inexperienced Chambers. Wenger really is tactically clueless.

http://statsbomb.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/CHEvARS.gif

Not really. While it is true Ozil tucked inside chambers always had help in the form of Flamini or Cazorla.

[MrExcalibur100 7,124]

Not really. While it is true Ozil tucked inside chambers always had help in the form of Flamini or Cazorla.

Yeah not quite the same thing. A winger will be able to get tighter to him up the pitch before he receives the ball like an auxiliary winger should. Not once did Ozil track back. Regardless, it was an obvious tactical oversight from Wenger.

[Chelsea Legend 11 4,062]

Yeah not quite the same thing. A winger will be able to get tighter to him up the pitch before he receives the ball like an auxiliary winger should. Not once did Ozil track back. Regardless, it was an obvious tactical oversight from Wenger.

I hear you but I wouldn't say it was a tactical oversight, its not like Eden was always in the ascendency with just he and chambers. He had a few instances on the flank but it not like we took full advantage of Chambers on a yellow and Hazard isolated on him. I actually thought Arsenal were pretty decent defensively yesterday, nowhere near as cavalier. They showed us respect.

[MrExcalibur100 7,124]

I hear you but I wouldn't say it was a tactical oversight, its not like Eden was always in the ascendency with just he and chambers. He had a few instances on the flank but it not like we took full advantage of Chambers on a yellow and Hazard isolated on him. I actually thought Arsenal were pretty decent defensively yesterday, nowhere near as cavalier. They showed us respect.

It also shows that Ozil spent most of the time playing as a CAM, despite some of their fans constantly making excuses for him.

[Daniel1980 1,425]

It also shows that Ozil spent most of the time playing as a CAM, despite some of their fans constantly making excuses for him.

It always amuses me when Arsenal fans use that excuse. Ozil basically has a free role at Arsenal. He doesn't track back, can roam wherever he wants, and still does nothing of use. None of our creative midfielders have the freedom Ozil enjoys.