Jump to content

Diego Costa


Spike
 Share

Recommended Posts

I get pissed off with the FA as much as most. But blaming this one on them is a bit too extreme. Costa knew what he was doing and deliberately stamped on whoever it was and earnt himself the ban. Not one of us would have an argument if it was any other non chelsea player.

Sure they have missed some in the past which is why the FA are a load of twats. But if Costa doesn't stamp on 2 people he doesn't get banned.

On the brightside he now gets a nice mid season break and can hopefully push on to be even better for the latter half of the season. If we can pull of a result vs city this could work out favourably, But a draw vs city isn't looking as bad as it was pre the costa ban.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get pissed off with the FA as much as most. But blaming this one on them is a bit too extreme. Costa knew what he was doing and deliberately stamped on whoever it was and earnt himself the ban. Not one of us would have an argument if it was any other non chelsea player.

Sure they have missed some in the past which is why the FA are a load of twats. But if Costa doesn't stamp on 2 people he doesn't get banned.

On the brightside he now gets a nice mid season break and can hopefully push on to be even better for the latter half of the season. If we can pull of a result vs city this could work out favourably, But a draw vs city isn't looking as bad as it was pre the costa ban.

Costa didn't stamp on anybody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get pissed off with the FA as much as most. But blaming this one on them is a bit too extreme. Costa knew what he was doing and deliberately stamped on whoever it was and earnt himself the ban. Not one of us would have an argument if it was any other non chelsea player.

Sure they have missed some in the past which is why the FA are a load of twats. But if Costa doesn't stamp on 2 people he doesn't get banned.

I will tell you why people are annoyed at the FA and why they are blaming them. First of all, the word 'Intent' can you tell me exactly with any reasonable doubt that Costa meant that? No, I didn't think so. This incident was missed by nigh on everybody that night, from ref, fourth official, Rodgers and only the Liverpool players reacted when Can got up to remonstrate with Costa after the incident took place. Michael Oliver was asked to review video evidence the following day and make a call on the incident, now, at the speed this has transpired they haven't fucked around, he's walked into his office and said 'Yes, he's done it" .....

So, we have established he stood on him, but asking this question to Oliver puts a total different light on the situation "Mr Oliver, did Diego Costa stand on Emre Can with intent" How the fuck can you answer that, and if the answer comes from the top of his head or our of thin air then that's where the problem lies straight off. Officials are human, they get things wrong but this was asked as a second review, as soon as Oliver gives the verdict there is no going back and the ban inevitable. Us as fans are very straight forward people who want consistency in the game, we aren't getting it. Look at the Aguero incident on Luiz there is a simple between these two incidents in that one, Aguero goes in two footed, that in itself is a straight red, secondly he has eyes firmly fixed on Luiz with aggression in his face. Costa is not even looking at Can in this incident.

I'm going to home to stamp on my dogs paw, I will immediately ask the wife if I meant it......She won't be able to answer it because she doesn't know I have done it with intent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it just happens to occur to the same player twice who isn't exactly the calmest of characters.

I can say I am 98% confident that at least one of them was intentional. At the very least he did nothing to try and avoid the player.

He deserves the ban. Can't be doing that sort of thing. I get we are all biased to Chelsea based decisions. Obviously we all are. If that happens to any other player then there is outrage and people saying the ban is deserving.

Yeah they fucked up the augero one doesn't mean they should get this wrong to make up for it.

We all know the fa don't give a shit and they are a load of crap. But don't give them the ammo to do it but stamping on two people in a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FA are not biased to any team. They never were. In United's time, they were intimidated by Fergie, not united.

The FA need's to look at the officials. They're not constant. The FA and ref's are simply crap, not biased. You're not going to charge Ageuro in 2 clear incidents vs west ham and us, but you charge Diego after just one day of the match? what a joke. Fergie used to say whatever the hell he wanted in his press conferences but whenever Jose says something controversial he get's fined. Double standards. They need to either punish everyone, or not punish anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You