Jump to content

The Board


 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Special Juan said:

Massive lesson learned or at least should be.

You feel that Conte almost planned the result of this from the summer of 2017 when he was spitting his dummy out that Chelsea weren't getting the players he wanted and reprimanded him for his handling of Costa.

You'd like to think though that the club is learning. We have in recent years shown greater patience with Jose, Conte and Sarri through difficult periods where in the past others would have been sacked, which is hopefully a good sign for giving Lampard more time and patience to build this team back up.

The handling of Sarri's departure was far more improved also, as the easy choice would have been to simply let him go but ensuring we got compensation to at the very least cover Lampard and his staff was a step in the right direction from the Conte shambles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Chelsea accounts show club paid out £26.6million over Conte sacking

https://www.fourfourtwo.com/news/chelsea-accounts-show-club-paid-out-ps266million-over-conte-sacking
Hacks
No other way to put it. They may be good on sponsorship deals, but if a human employee is involved (player, manager, other personnel, etc.) the outcome is far, far too often just shambolic.


Happens when he had a good, longterm Contract. Chelsea should either have given him way less money or a shorter deal.
That is the price you have to play when you sack as much as we do

Gesendet von meinem SM-G920F mit Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Superblue_1986 said:

You feel that Conte almost planned the result of this from the summer of 2017 when he was spitting his dummy out that Chelsea weren't getting the players he wanted and reprimanded him for his handling of Costa.

You'd like to think though that the club is learning. We have in recent years shown greater patience with Jose, Conte and Sarri through difficult periods where in the past others would have been sacked, which is hopefully a good sign for giving Lampard more time and patience to build this team back up.

The handling of Sarri's departure was far more improved also, as the easy choice would have been to simply let him go but ensuring we got compensation to at the very least cover Lampard and his staff was a step in the right direction from the Conte shambles.

We also got lucky Juve came calling for Sarii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, NikkiCFC said:

And some people say he doesn't care anymore... 

Amazing isn’t it? 

We’ve been so incompetent recently that we would’ve been insolvent for it weren’t for Roman. 

I honestly believe this is a reason why Cech was appointed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/01/2020 at 11:23 AM, Vesper said:

Chelsea accounts show club paid out £26.6million over Conte sacking

https://www.fourfourtwo.com/news/chelsea-accounts-show-club-paid-out-ps266million-over-conte-sacking

Hacks

No other way to put it. They may be good on sponsorship deals, but if a human employee is involved (player, manager, other personnel, etc.) the outcome is far, far too often just shambolic.

Well...theyve gotta pay out a extra 85,000 on top....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Blues had revenues of £452.2million in 2018/19 according to the latest Deloitte Money League.

It's a return that makes them the ninth richest club in the world, but not the top club in London. Tottenham Hotspur claimed that title last season by reaching the final of the Champions League.

Despite this they've fallen down the overall rankings as other clubs have grown much faster.

Back in 2008/09 Chelsea were actually the fifth richest club in the world, a position they held up to the 2011/12 campaign.

https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/sports-business-group/articles/deloitte-football-money-league.html#

Deloitte Football Money League 2020

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nicco said:

With CL we could probably reach 500, we aren't really that far from United and City considering they played and went deep in the CL last year while we played Europa League.

The stadium is a huge issue

the cost of building it doesn't count versus FFP 

and it shorts us at least £50m plus in game-day and lux box revenue per year

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Vesper said:

The Blues had revenues of £452.2million in 2018/19 according to the latest Deloitte Money League.

It's a return that makes them the ninth richest club in the world, but not the top club in London. Tottenham Hotspur claimed that title last season by reaching the final of the Champions League.

Despite this they've fallen down the overall rankings as other clubs have grown much faster.

Back in 2008/09 Chelsea were actually the fifth richest club in the world, a position they held up to the 2011/12 campaign.

https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/sports-business-group/articles/deloitte-football-money-league.html#

Deloitte Football Money League 2020

In all fairness Spurs have barely managed to get above us despite reaching the Champions League final which would have been a huge windfall for them. With Champions League revenue back this coming year, we should be much closer to Liverpool and Man City's revenue figures.

The top 3 won't be budged anytime soon, Bayern monopolise their country and PSG are bankrolled. 

To be fair with how small our stadium is, we punch pretty damn well.

Oh well, I'm sure Spurs will find a way to argue this makes them the biggest and best team in London despite those cobwebs thickening in their trophy cabinet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You