Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and join in with the discussions! Click Here

Mario Pašalić


The only place to be
 Share
Followers 3

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Kieran. said:

Wasn't this guy highly rated and had a good spell at Monaco? What happened? He's still on our books but not gone out on loan yet.

 

His back got injured in February. His loan spell was cancelled and he has been recovering in London since that. He started training with his teammates(U21 or loan squad I think) a few days ago. We didn't loan him bc he was not in a good condition, same situation like Van Ginkel's.

 

pasalicmario

I'm back! Finally training with team, football trainings. First week is done!

 

Hopefully he can cat fit in the next two weeks and goes out on loan. He had great spells at Elche and Monaco. He is linked with a move to Leganes, new arrival in Primiera Division.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 429
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Vitesse are rubbing their hands with glee.

Yes....come to a big club that has fantastic facilities, coaches and opportunities. I know the point you're getting at that we haven't promoted as many young players as we would have liked but there i

He shouldn't even be playing at u21 level, too good for it. Many have compared him to Lampard or Ballack, i'd say it's probably a mixture of the two. He's one of my favourite young players.

Feel a bit sorry for the lad after how happy he was to come here when we got him.One of Mous wants! We were throwing comparisons around to Lamps and Modric.

I hope he does well whatever happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chelsea: "We'd like to buy Romagnoli, please."

Milan: "No way! Not for sale!"

Milan: "We'd like Pasalic, please."

Chelsea: "Sure thing, lads. Want us to take care of the plane ticket and medical for you too?"

Seriously, though. Why do favors for a club who refuses to do business with us?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Pizy said:

Chelsea: "We'd like to buy Romagnoli, please."

Milan: "No way! Not for sale!"

Milan: "We'd like Pasalic, please."

Chelsea: "Sure thing, lads. Want us to take care of the plane ticket and medical for you too?"

Seriously, though. Why do favors for a club who refuses to do business with us?

it's chelsea's way...

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, xPetrCechx said:

                         #Milan close to acquiring #Pasalic on loan from #Chelsea - GianlucaDiMarzio.com

should we not keep him then? perhaps they know something we don't...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Spike said:

It's not favours and Romagnoli and Pasalic are not equivalent. The former being an expensive first team star and the later an injured loanee that has been bought to be sold. 

AC Milan have no reason to sell and to expect them to roll-over at the first bid is arrogant. Why on earth should AC Milan even entertain a bid?

Not necessarily to be sold. He's got some promise as a holding midfielder; pity he was injured.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When running down a list of clubs to send your player on loan to, how do you end up on and not move past AC Milan? How on earth would they stick in your mind as the right choice? 

They didn't do anything for Van Ginkel, they just rejected a transfer proposal from us for one of their players, so we want to send them one of our best prospects? To this side which will again finish behind Juventus, Napoli, Roma, Fiorentina, Inter? You think a player will thrive floating around 10th place in Serie A for a team that's been in shambles for years?

Fuck whoever does our player loans.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...

He is a big potential. I can't understand why we put that clause in  a loan deal. If they want to buy him after this loan they have to give us 6million which I think it's such a low price....great player...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, LegenTerry said:

He is a big potential. I can't understand why we put that clause in  a loan deal. If they want to buy him after this loan they have to give us 6million which I think it's such a low price....great player...

I watched him a few times at Elche and Monaco and I saw him today, he is a good player, but not really a midfielder we need in our current position.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...