Leif 6,006 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 It's funny that Mata was invisible and Drogba fouled for both penalties... Funny how Drogba was behind the ball most of the game. It's funny, how everyone outside of Chelsea thinks Chelsea played 10-0-0.Your Rep to Post ratio is what's funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korea 734 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Your Rep to Post ratio is what's funny. I can get 1000x likes If i write KDB is god.Hazard is uber.Oscar is uber. Doesnt really take much to get the approval of kids these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 It's funny that Mata was invisible and Drogba fouled for both penalties... Funny how Drogba was behind the ball most of the game. It's funny, how everyone outside of Chelsea thinks Chelsea played 10-0-0. On a side note, I dont blame RDm for his tactics, he was going to lose if he didnt and lose badly. I love how Im the glory hunter. Yet, your not. I can understand people from England saying that to me, but not you. Def. not you.we were over-run, out played by BM. we needed 10 men behind the ball,but does that change how we were set up to play???do u know how , i actually dont have a word to describe, u sound??? a lot of things can happen differently on the pitch. we even got outplayed in a match by brentford and even in that match needed 10 men to defend. does that change how we set our selves to play in that match. being defensive is DIFFERENT, than saying that chelsea used a formation of 10-0-0. just like our main argument of 4-2-3-1 turning into a 4-3-3 cos mikel/rambo/lamps are not able to feed the ball to the AMs, hence oscar/mata have to come deep into our own half to get the ball. does that change what formation we play? NO. get it?????ii m not a regular at the bluemoon forum so forgive me if i think some chelsea fan would even like to go there. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korea 734 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 we were over-run, out played by BM. we needed 10 men behind the ball,but does that change how we were set up to play???do u know how , i actually dont have a word to describe, u sound??? a lot of things can happen differently on the pitch. we even got outplayed in a match by brentford and even in that match needed 10 men to defend. does that change how we set our selves to play in that match. being defensively is DIFFERENT, than saying that chelsea used a formation of 10-0-0. just like our main argument of 4-2-3-1 turning into a 4-3-3 cos mikel/rambo/lamps are not able to feed the ball to the AMs, hence oscar/mata have to come deep into our own half to get the ball. does that change what formation we play? NO. get it?????ii m not a regular at the bluemoon forum so forgive me if i think some chelsea fan would even like to go there. LOLJust cause we were 4-2-3-1 on paper, doesnt mean we play that during the game most of the duration.Anyone can see, Chelsea 2013-2014 is mostly 4-3-3 during the game. Jose knows his pivot is shit, why would he play 4-2-3-1. There a reason (one of many) why Oscar starts over anyone else in the middle and why both KDB nor Mata can get any playing time for Jose... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Kaiser 77 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 We need 3 points from this game! And I hope that we can get clean sheet here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Just cause we were 4-2-3-1 on paper, doesnt mean we play that during the game most of the duration.Anyone can see, Chelsea 2013-2014 is mostly 4-3-3 during the game. Jose knows his pivot is shit, why would he play 4-2-3-1. There a reason (one of many) why Oscar starts over anyone else in the middle and why both KDB nor Mata can get any playing time for Jose...why the hell is the smiley which depicts a person hitting his head on the wall, not available to me. cos this situation is exactly like that. what have i been saying??? we line up as 4-2-3-1 but considering at what happens on the pitch we change to 4-3-3. there have been many matches where we have remained 4-2-3-1 or even gone to 4-1-4-1 when in attack mode. but it still does not change the FACT that we line up as 4-2-3-1. that is our base formation. players thruout 90 minutes do not maintain the same position. this is not foosball where the plastic players are pretty much hinged and cant move. so for the last time, our base formation is 4-2-3-1, which can become 4-1-4-1 or 4-3-3 according to the situation in the match. its like talking to a child. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 A standard and comfortable 2-0 will suit me down to the ground.These you shoot, we shoot games really aren't all they are cracked up to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Tony Pulisplayed chelsea 11 times in his career as manager2 draws 9 losses3 goals scored, 24 concededStoke had a similar record to that before last week and with our defense lately, Pulis will smell blood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liquidator 5,176 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 AND IT'S NECESSARY TO DRAW YOUR ATTENTION TO THE FACT WE DON'T GIVE A FUCK WHAT YOU SAY CHELSEA, WE'RE STANDING ANYWAYedit: this was the lovely, respectful email sent to fans with tickets in the MHL for this Saturday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korea 734 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 why the hell is the smiley which depicts a person hitting his head on the wall, not available to me. cos this situation is exactly like that. what have i been saying??? we line up as 4-2-3-1 but considering at what happens on the pitch we change to 4-3-3. there have been many matches where we have remained 4-2-3-1 or even gone to 4-1-4-1 when in attack mode. but it still does not change the FACT that we line up as 4-2-3-1. that is our base formation. players thruout 90 minutes do not maintain the same position. this is not foosball where the plastic players are pretty much hinged and cant move. so for the last time, our base formation is 4-2-3-1, which can become 4-1-4-1 or 4-3-3 according to the situation in the match. its like talking to a child.Why do I bother responding to you and bushman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
didierforever 7,349 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Why do I bother responding to you and bushman.please dont. would be a great favor to the 2 of us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starman60 1,343 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 We really need an emphatic victory here to restore the Karma in the team. Against Steau the other night i really thought we were on to score 6 or 7 but we again fell flat and ran out of ideas. We need the win guys (I know, "Obviously") Cech Ivanovich Luiz Terry Cole Ramires Lampard Schurrle Oscar Hazard Ba Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stats 7,142 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 I am 100% sure Mata will start this game. Not sure why people have him out of their line up. His creativity will be vital in breaking down Palace and he never played in midweek so I expect to see him start and I am sure Mourinho will know Palace will look to make it difficult so him playing Mata is a must IMO. Not just through his creativity in open play but sometimes his set pieces can be the difference in getting that key goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseasMessiah 304 Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 I'd love to see Lampard on the bench as he's been holding us back this season and Oscar in the pivot next to Ramires with Schurrle on the wing.They wouldn't go more than 5 seconds in possession of the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustafa 885 Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 A big win against Palace, Arsenal loss/draw, Liverpool loss, and Moyes gets some more stick from his own fansAll of this happens and ill be fairly content Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edetarod 2,155 Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Chelsea inflicted Tony Pulis heaviest ever defeat as a Barclays Premier League coach - 0-7 versus Stoke City in April 2010 at Stamford Bridge. i miss these scorelines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xPetrCechx 13,571 Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazardinho 88 Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 Last time we had Schurrle there he was very bad so get Ba there cause he is only one who can score at this moment I thought last two goals came from Schurrle (Stoke game), Ba didn't score against Steaua, it was an own goal) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The only place to be 11,313 Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 We should be absolutely demolishing teams like this but the blueprint for how to beat us is out there and I hate shit strikers like Chamakh coming into form when we play him. I've got the most horrible feeling that he'll score.Would like to see us having more shots from deep as well which means Schurrle and Lamps starting for me. Hazard is undroppable seemingly and that leaves us choosing between Mata, Oscar and Willian for the third spot. Wouldn't mind seeing De Bruyne get a start.This is a must-win though. The other teams around us are playing one another and I could even see United dropping more points at Villa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChelseasMessiah 304 Posted December 13, 2013 Share Posted December 13, 2013 I can't fucking believe they've assigned this hack to referee our game. I wonder what Mark Clusterfuck's plans are to make sure we lose tomorrow... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.8fb88d2f3e0e6884a1aa67c4dce82986.jpg)
Recommended Posts