Jump to content

Chelsea v Man City


Jase
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mata will still drift inside though.

Yeah, but if we play a counter attacking 4-3-3, the point of it would be to use width and attack them, so we wouldn't really want him drifting too much. I don't think we will play a 4-3-3, anyway,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 635
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think you're just struggling to come to terms with the fact that Lamps doesn't play these big games anymore. He plays Thursdays nights against Rubin or Saturday against Southampton, and we cross our fingers that he plays well.

Away to City we had Rami on the wing and Lamps in the middle - we need to go with Rami in the middle (alongside Mikel) and Lamps on the bench and pray that they have a good game. That's where the game will be won and lost.

That's been one of our bigger problems this season. The lack of midfield depth has cost us quite a few games this season.

Lampard is ageing, Ramires provides energy but sometimes his passing is awful, Mikel is playing a limited role, Romeu would of been useful & Oscar isn't really a CM yet.

If only we had someone like Meireles or KdB as a squad player this season...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's been one of our bigger problems this season. The lack of midfield depth has cost us quite a few games this season.

Lampard is ageing, Ramires provides energy but sometimes his passing is awful, Mikel is playing a limited role, Romeu would of been useful & Oscar isn't really a CM yet.

If only we had someone like Meireles or KdB as a squad player this season...

Romeu has been a massive miss for us. He could've really made that position his own and saved us from having to endure Mikel so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're just struggling to come to terms with the fact that Lamps doesn't play these big games anymore. He plays Thursdays nights against Rubin or Saturday against Southampton, and we cross our fingers that he plays well.

Away to City we had Rami on the wing and Lamps in the middle - we need to go with Rami in the middle (alongside Mikel) and Lamps on the bench and pray that they have a good game. That's where the game will be won and lost.

The game is won in the middle of the pitch. Games against City always are. Ramires and Mikel are not enough against 4 city mids, we need three men there hence 4-3-3 and Lamps is still the man for a that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The game is won in the middle of the pitch. Games against City always are. Ramires and Mikel are not enough against 4 city mids, we need three men there hence 4-3-3 and Lamps is still the man for a that.

If you want to outmuscle them in midfield, why not Ake? He was solid against Kazan getting team high interceptions and distributing the ball well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want to outmuscle them in midfield, why not Ake? He was solid against Kazan getting team high interceptions and distributing the ball well.

Do you really prefer Ake over Lampard in a game againt ManCity? Your hatred for Lampard really must be deeply personal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you really prefer Ake over Lampard in a game againt ManCity? Your hatred for Lampard really must be deeply personal.

I don't hate Lampard, but the argument you're putting forward is purely sentimental. If you want to outfight that Man City midfield then why would you pick Lampard over Ake? By what metric is he a better option for that role in 2013?

Ake works harder, he intercepts more passes, he tackles better and he's a better defensively-minded player whilst also having solid technical skills.

I love Lamps, and I really am not a fan of Mikel but I'd pick Mikel ahead of Lampard in this game every time because he's better suited to that role in the team. In fact Lamps doesn't have a role in a 4231 because he's not good enough for a position in the double pivot.

People wanting to change to a 433 have to acknowledge that they're pushing Mata into a position where he's not as effective despite him being our best player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't hate Lampard, but the argument you're putting forward is purely sentimental. If you want to outfight that Man City midfield then why would you pick Lampard over Ake? By what metric is he a better option for that role in 2013?

Ake works harder, he intercepts more passes, he tackles better and he's a better defensively-minded player whilst also having solid technical skills.

I love Lamps, and I really am not a fan of Mikel but I'd pick Mikel ahead of Lampard in this game every time because he's better suited to that role in the team. In fact Lamps doesn't have a role in a 4231 because he's not good enough for a position in the double pivot.

People wanting to change to a 433 have to acknowledge that they're pushing Mata into a position where he's not as effective despite him being our best player.

Mata is useless most of the game against City, no matter what position he plays. The good thing about him is even, in a game where he is subdued he only needs one brilliant pass to change the game.

Ake is about the same size as Oscar and will do fuck all against Yaya. Lamps still is good enough for us in a 4-3-3 where he can play his best position. Ake is a CB. Surely Lamps is better than ake in general Of course he is better than ake in CM. Lamps is much better suited to that tole. Lamps performance against Kazan was also better than Akes. I did not see Ake intercepting or tackling that well, acutallay, Akes performance was average at best. Lamps is better technical, the better passer and finisher. A midfield of Mikel, Ramires, Ake would have no creativity at alll. Lamps's long balls will be instrumental in such a game.

I know Lamps is aging, should not play every game, esp not every big game but there is no way, s.o. like Ake with less than 10 professional games should start this knd of game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mata is useless most of the game against City, no matter what position he plays. The good thing about him is even, in a game where he is subdued he only needs one brilliant pass to change the game.

Ake is about the same size as Oscar and will do fuck all against Yaya. Lamps still is good enough for us in a 4-3-3 where he can play his best position. Ake is a CB. Surely Lamps is better than ake in general Of course he is better than ake in CM. Lamps is much better suited to that tole. Lamps performance against Kazan was also better than Akes. I did not see Ake intercepting or tackling that well, acutallay, Akes performance was average at best. Lamps is better technical, the better passer and finisher. A midfield of Mikel, Ramires, Ake would have no creativity at alll. Lamps's long balls will be instrumental in such a game.

I know Lamps is aging, should not play every game, esp not every big game but there is no way, s.o. like Ake with less than 10 professional games should start this knd of game

You may not have seen Ake intercepting that well, but he did. In fact he worked hard throughout the game and he's very much a defensive midfielder nowadays and has been for a while. The argument you're putting forward is based on nothing more than your love for Lamps which is why it's pointless discussing this with you.

A midfield of Rami, Ake and Mikel would provide a stable platform to allow the creative players to do their thing. Personally I'd stick with the 4231 though and put Rami and Mikel there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may not have seen Ake intercepting that well, but he did. In fact he worked hard throughout the game and he's very much a defensive midfielder nowadays and has been for a while. The argument you're putting forward is based on nothing more than your love for Lamps which is why it's pointless discussing this with you.

A midfield of Rami, Ake and Mikel would provide a stable platform to allow the creative players to do their thing. Personally I'd stick with the 4231 though and put Rami and Mikel there.

A midfield of ake, Rami and Mikel would get hammered. It offers no creativity and no linkup. The attackers would either hang in the air or would have to drop back leaving no one up front. Lamps is a brilliant passer, finisher and experienced leader, ake is nothing of that. I doubt Ake is even better at defending and intercepting than Lamps. You base that on a game against a clueless Kazan side, where Lamps played CAM. I bet if he had played DM he would have made at least as many interceptions and tackles as Ake. If we stick with 4-2-3-1 i would also not play Lamps, but there is no way ake would play for me in that game no matter what formation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lmfao at the city fan who said He would want Mata from any of our players because he'd be a good 'replacement' when Silvas injured.

Silva may suit better for Spain due to the close passing, but in football ability, hes a poor mans Juan Mata

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A midfield of ake, Rami and Mikel would get hammered. It offers no creativity and no linkup. The attackers would either hang in the air or would have to drop back leaving no one up front. Lamps is a brilliant passer, finisher and experienced leader, ake is nothing of that. I doubt Ake is even better at defending and intercepting than Lamps. You base that on a game against a clueless Kazan side, where Lamps played CAM. I bet if he had played DM he would have made at least as many interceptions and tackles as Ake. If we stick with 4-2-3-1 i would also not play Lamps, but there is no way ake would play for me in that game no matter what formation

I'm basing it on watching many youth games involving Ake and many games watching Lamps. The fact is that our midfield is weak at the moment which is why people are talking about putting Luiz there and moving to a three-man midfield.

It's exactly why Lampard's contract hasn't been renewed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm basing it on watching many youth games involving Ake and many games watching Lamps. The fact is that our midfield is weak at the moment which is why people are talking about putting Luiz there and moving to a three-man midfield.

It's exactly why Lampard's contract hasn't been renewed.

Franks contract has not been renewed is because of his age & salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His age and salary wouldn't be such an issue if he had a position in the team in which he can perform at a high level - he doesn't.

For his age he still performs well. Not for every game though. After all he still has plenty of goals.

The team is looking for a long term player there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You