the wes 7,212 Posted April 2, 2008 Share Posted April 2, 2008 http://www.chelseapies.tv/2008/04/youre_av..._you_go_45.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidEU 2,023 Posted April 2, 2008 Share Posted April 2, 2008 Dont change the system for such an important game. Stick with the 4-3-3 with Didier uptop tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,539 Posted April 2, 2008 Share Posted April 2, 2008 Knowing Grant he'll make a formation up lol. I'd say 4-4-2.It works well for us as long as Moulda and Pizzaro bless them arent any of them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fulham Broadway 17,365 Posted April 3, 2008 Share Posted April 3, 2008 If I was Avram Grant I'd top myself. Its definitely time he fucked off now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EskWeston 696 Posted April 3, 2008 Share Posted April 3, 2008 4-3-3 was the right formation to start with, although i still mantain Malouda isn't worth the effort at the moment! Should have changed to 4-4-2 though at half time.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliott 7 Posted April 3, 2008 Share Posted April 3, 2008 Malouda didn't do quite as badly as I expected, but he was still very ineffective. It was either him or SWP, and Shauny didn't cover himself in glory against Boro so Malouda was given the nod. It just goes to show we lack quality on the wings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EskWeston 696 Posted April 3, 2008 Share Posted April 3, 2008 Malouda didn't do quite as badly as I expected, but he was still very ineffective. It was either him or SWP, and Shauny didn't cover himself in glory against Boro so Malouda was given the nod. It just goes to show we lack quality on the wings. That has been obvious for quite some time! Basically we have never still been able to replace Robben and Duff properly. We need those types of players.... Malouda wasn't as bad, but still against poor oposition for and hour didn't do enough! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laylabelle 9,539 Posted April 3, 2008 Share Posted April 3, 2008 That has been obvious for quite some time! Basically we have never still been able to replace Robben and Duff properly. We need those types of players.... Malouda wasn't as bad, but still against poor oposition for and hour didn't do enough! Lol ones who dont go out on the pitch and first tackle breaks their leg But yeh Robben when on form/not dying was just woha. And Duff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kbchel 2 Posted April 3, 2008 Share Posted April 3, 2008 ribery?? why we didnt signed him??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.