Jump to content

Jeremie Boga


TacticalBlues
 Share

Recommended Posts

Could be a nice, cheap replacement for Pedro.The club seem to have done well to learn from previous mistakes with these buy back clauses they have been inserting.

Just how good is Boga now though. Where would be fall within our depth chart?

I personally don't think it would happen, but an option could be to bring someone like this in for 6 months completely risk free and to loan CHO out for the rest of the season who I think would benefit massively from just playing week in week out for the rest of the season. He needs to play himself back into peak fitness and confidence and it'll be difficult at present breaking into our team when he's not playing well at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Superblue_1986 said:

Could be a nice, cheap replacement for Pedro.The club seem to have done well to learn from previous mistakes with these buy back clauses they have been inserting.

Just how good is Boga now though. Where would be fall within our depth chart?

I personally don't think it would happen, but an option could be to bring someone like this in for 6 months completely risk free and to loan CHO out for the rest of the season who I think would benefit massively from just playing week in week out for the rest of the season. He needs to play himself back into peak fitness and confidence and it'll be difficult at present breaking into our team when he's not playing well at all.

Loan out an 18 y/o who is rumoured to be on £180,000 a week? Yeah good luck with that. Unless we pay 3/4s of his wages but again loaning him out is not the best move considering the whole transfer request over a lack of playing time. And thats before even considering buying Jermaine Boga back to cover him....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OneMoSalah said:

Loan out an 18 y/o who is rumoured to be on £180,000 a week? Yeah good luck with that. Unless we pay 3/4s of his wages but again loaning him out is not the best move considering the whole transfer request over a lack of playing time. And thats before even considering buying Jermaine Boga back to cover him....

I think it's a pretty unique and extreme situation however. CHO will get more chances and game time this season than last, he already feels more part of the squad than he was for most of last season. But the injury has massively hindered him and in my opinion he just needs a good run of games and at present he won't get that here. He'll play games, but I don't think he'll get the amount he's going to benefit from coming back from the injury he suffered. Even he himself must realise at present he's desperately out of nick and whilst he's not performing he quite simply won't be playing at a club this size. If there is a long term plan in place, I wouldn't see it being a problem. If anything CHO may feel it's the best solution for himself too to help get him to the Euro's because at present he's at huge risk of losing his place in the England squad.

His wage shouldn't come into it really. I think a lot of teams in the bottom half of the league would be quite happy to pay him £100,000 or possibly more a week to have him for 6 months and otherwise I'm sure the club would be prepared to supplement some of the wages if necessary if it was the right thing for the long term of one of our best young assets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watched him again. Was a good performance, but he was not at his best. One huge reason was that most of their attacks came from the right Side. Also, Sassuolo does not really have Quality passers.

About his Performance itself, he had his dribblings and some good crosses.
Now, Teams know that you have to double and triple Boga, so that Sassoulo gets their main asset out of the game. Good for Traore that he gets more Space to do his game when everyone focuses on Boga.


Gesendet von meinem SM-G920F mit Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always rated him and musonda. Was so disappointed it did not happen for them. But good to know he is back on track. But is barcelona is interested, makes it next to impossible for us to get him. Why would he choose us over barca. Even in a buy back clause, the player has to agree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 1905didierblue said:

Always rated him and musonda. Was so disappointed it did not happen for them. But good to know he is back on track. But is barcelona is interested, makes it next to impossible for us to get him. Why would he choose us over barca. Even in a buy back clause, the player has to agree. 

Could be wrong but if exercised i think they have no choice. Take the Morata situation for example, i very much doubt he would have agreed to rejoin Madrid just to be sold on again if he had a say in the matter.

The best Boga could do (if he doesn't want to return) is either plead with us not to activate the release clause or let us sell him for a profit immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Tomo said:

Could be wrong but if exercised i think they have no choice. Take the Morata situation for example, i very much doubt he would have agreed to rejoin Madrid just to be sold on again if he had a say in the matter.

The best Boga could do (if he doesn't want to return) is either plead with us not to activate the release clause or let us sell him for a profit immediately.

Maybe. But does not sound right. I mean it's an agreement between the clubs not the club and the player. What if boga demands 200kpw (hypothetical), just to put us off. But I also think the clubs would only put in buy back clauses with players they are fair certain would "want" to come back. So let's hope.

As for morata, again not sure, but if I had to guess, it might have been something like : you get a raise of x% from us and then y% from Chelsea. 

At the end of the day, I can only speculate. All these dealings are far more complicated than "we should get this player at any cost". I guess people actually think it's as easy as doing shit on FIFA. 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tomo said:

Could be wrong but if exercised i think they have no choice. Take the Morata situation for example, i very much doubt he would have agreed to rejoin Madrid just to be sold on again if he had a say in the matter.

The best Boga could do (if he doesn't want to return) is either plead with us not to activate the release clause or let us sell him for a profit immediately.

You are correct, the player has no choice as they signed the contract. The only exception would be if the contract gives the player the right of refusal. I have never seen such a provision, and a selling club would be mad to insert that option, as the player could simply void the entire point of the buyback clause with the stroke of a pen.

 

https://www.sportskeeda.com/football/what-is-a-buy-back-clause-and-how-does-it-work

This is exactly how buy-back clause works in football with a few changes.  The main purpose of inserting a buy-back clause in the transfer agreements is to give the selling club a sense of security of being able to repurchase a player should he excel in the future. The buyback clause has to be agreed before the player can make a transfer. It may or may not be removed after a certain time period or conditions depending on the contract agreed. 

No other club except the selling club can pay the fee agreed while negotiating and in maximum cases, the player would have to go back to the parent club when they call for him. The player does not have a say in it and is powerless. 

 

Football transfers: Buy-Back Clauses explained

https://www.lawinsport.com/topics/contract-law/item/football-transfers-buy-back-clauses-explained?category_id=117

Buy-back clauses in transfer agreements are used primarily to give a selling club the security of being able to repurchase a promising player at a set fee should the player excel in the future. Some high profile examples of such reported clauses include, Álvaro Morata (Juve back to Madrid),1 Casemiro  (Porto back to Real Madrid),2 and Gerard Deulofeu (Everton back to Barcelona).3 In many cases, the benefit of the transfer extends to the:

The buy-back provision is usually based on a number of individual or cumulative triggers including activating the clause:

Should a buy-back provision be triggered, there is usually a contractual obligation to enforce the contract and transfer the player accordingly.

As such provisions are commercial agreements between contracting parties, there is always the possibility of removing a buy-back clause should both parties agree (usually through payment made to the club that has the benefit of the buy-back clause). An interesting situation was reported over the summer with Atletico Madrid defender, Toby Alderweireld,  who was on loan at Southampton for the 2014/15 season.4 Southampton had an agreement with Atletico when entering into the loan deal that they had the option to purchase the defender for £6.8m. Although not a buy-back provision, the clause gave Southampton the ability to convert the loan into a permanent transfer unless Atletico paid Southampton £1.5m to remove the clause. In the 2015 summer window Tottenham bid around £11.5m that Atletico accepted. Southampton though wanted to enforce the £6.8m purchase clause. It has not been publically reported how the matter was finally resolved but it is likely that Atletico provided compensation to Southampton in order for the player to transfer to Tottenham.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You