BOSS 372 Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Why aren't we linked with this guy? He is perfect for the EPL and he is the perfect midfielder for us to play in the pivot with Luiz.Not only is he creative but he scores goals he can defend very very well + he is a very hardworking player. He is cheap (around 12m euros) and he has the potential to be world class.He plays like Lamps. He is 22 and he already is the captain for the dutch national team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Great potential, I would take him imediately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOSS 372 Posted January 8, 2013 Author Share Posted January 8, 2013 Great potential, I would take him imediately.Yes indeed, not only does he have great potential but he already is beast. So he is not a player to buy and loan out but he is a player that breaks through in the starting XI immediately the same happened with Hazard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jype 6,398 Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 I'm almost certain he will go to Manchester United. If old red nose won't go after Strootman instead of yet another striker like Lewandowski he should retire already.Would take him at Chelsea any time, a shame we aren't even linked with him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mufassir08 2,400 Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 How good a passer is he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cadenza666 221 Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 Dutch ...so he'll end up at United ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corner 456 Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 How good a passer is he?Very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skipper 20,609 Posted January 8, 2013 Share Posted January 8, 2013 He would be such an interesting transfer. Don't know why the club aren't (supposedly) looking at him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beepu 1,714 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 He would be such an interesting transfer. Don't know why the club aren't (supposedly) looking at him.sometimes i wonder how club scoutings work? maybe he is being looked at, we just dont know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DYC. 7,542 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 I'd most definitely rather get him then Fellaini. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azpinator 2,325 Posted January 21, 2013 Share Posted January 21, 2013 It would be great to have him here, he's very promising. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLyon 9,359 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Top passer, hard worker, tackler and actualy equal in strenght and vision. Plays for Roma, with proper money definately available even in january.Would fit in Lamps place brilliantly.Just a question; why the hell didnt we buy Strootman instead of Van Ginkel if we needed imediate impact in midifeld? And Strootman is just 23 after all...chelsea board is so fucking weird... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azpinator 2,325 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Top passer, hard worker, tackler and actualy equal in strenght and vision.Plays for Roma, with proper money definately available even in january.Would fit in Lamps place brilliantly.Just a question; why the hell didnt we buy Strootman instead of Van Ginkel if we needed imediate impact in midifeld? And Strootman is just 23 after all...chelsea board is so fucking weird...The Van Ginkel transfer is the weirdest if you think about it. I would easily choose Strootman or Cabaye instead. *sigh* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blu35_army 551 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Van Ginkel is actually injured till now and still didn't play and prove anything. and you called him the weirdest transfer??? logic please.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lionsden 4,689 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Top passer, hard worker, tackler and actualy equal in strenght and vision.Plays for Roma, with proper money definately available even in january.Would fit in Lamps place brilliantly.Just a question; why the hell didnt we buy Strootman instead of Van Ginkel if we needed imediate impact in midifeld? And Strootman is just 23 after all...chelsea board is so fucking weird...You are asking the wrong question. more like "why did we buy Van Ginkel (another box to box sans attacking midfielder) instead of Strootman (a legit central midfielder/regista).People can wax lyrical about the great things emenalo or whoever is in charge of transfers at the club have done all they want but when you spend over 340 million on transfers over the past 4 seasons and the squad is still very unbalanced and low on overall quality, which has hugely led to regression in performances and result over that period in the league then serious questions need to be asked about the competency of those in charge of transfer dealings. What is the use of unlimited resources/money if you cannot spend it wisely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laeth 527 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Why aren't we linked with this guy? He is perfect for the EPL and he is the perfect midfielder for us to play in the pivot with Luiz.Not only is he creative but he scores goals he can defend very very well + he is a very hardworking player. He is cheap (around 12m euros) and he has the potential to be world class.He plays like Lamps. He is 22 and he already is the captain for the dutch national team. At the time, Van Ginkel was out playing Strootman in the Dutch team. If I remember correctly, almost everyeone here was pleased we got Van Ginkel over Strootman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drog.ba 239 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Van Ginkel was cheaper/ younger/looked to be potentially better. I suspect he was bought in the hope he'd replace Lampard and not to have an immediate impact, doubt we wanted anyone to replace Ramires/Lampard in midfield straight away. But Strootman is exactly what we need in midfield Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul Caliber X 27 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Van Ginkel has been injured for a long time and we haven't really seen what he can do, so to compare him and Strootman wouldn't be right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azpinator 2,325 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Van Ginkel is actually injured till now and still didn't play and prove anything. and you called him the weirdest transfer??? logic please....I said that because he's younger than everyone else in the first team (except Kalas), and that Strootman is more ready for a tough season in the PL than him.Here's some logic for your delight:You are asking the wrong question. more like "why did we buy Van Ginkel (another box to box sans attacking midfielder) instead of Strootman (a legit central midfielder/regista).People can wax lyrical about the great things emenalo or whoever is in charge of transfers at the club have done all they want but when you spend over 340 million on transfers over the past 4 seasons and the squad is still very unbalanced and low on overall quality, which has hugely led to regression in performances and result over that period in the league then serious questions need to be asked about the competency of those in charge of transfer dealings. What is the use of unlimited resources/money if you cannot spend it wisely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyikolajevics 2,713 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 He is a very good player, but I think we need a destroyer like Nainggolan or Imbula. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts