Jump to content

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡³ Demba Ba


KonohasOrangeFlash
 Share

Recommended Posts

FFP isn't a reality. FFP is a joke. It is to stop small clubs being taken over and having 400 million pounds spent in 2 transfer windows basically. Its basically so the AC Milans, Barcelonas, Real Madrids, Man Uniteds etc are all going to be the only elite clubs - making as much money as they want - spending it if they want with no consequence. Basically it won't allow teams to grow into top teams in the manner us, City and PSG did.

Joke is not the opposite of reality. FFP might be a joke, but it is a reality. Malaga is banned for a year from European competitions because they could not pay wages and taxes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FFP is to stop other clubs competing with big clubs (of which we are one) through means of outside investment. It benefits us long-term, but I agree it's a massive joke.

Either way, it's the new reality and we're making strides to comply with it.

A owner can buy a small club and invest in the academy or in a new stadium. Investments in academy or in the club structure does not count in FFP. In fact Roman is part of the process where football will become a matter of wich club have the richest owner. Thats why I believe FFP might work.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A owner can buy a small club and invest in the academy or in a new stadium. Investments in academy or in the club structure does not count in FFP. In fact Roman is part of the process where football will become a matter of wich club have the richest owner. Thats why I believe FFP might work.
What it DOES stop though is lets say an Abramovich coming to a club and just buying the best available talent out there from his own pockets and not by what money the club produces. In a sense, this is advantageous to big established clubs like ourselves who have already gone through that process. What FFP will do is stop a new Man City, PSG or Chelsea occurring which is fair enough.

Back on topic though, I think Ba doesn't want to sign because the club have told him he'll be behind Torres. Don't think it's anything with the wages - perhaps as people have said the agent fees could've also played a hand in it but we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back on topic though, I think Ba doesn't want to sign because the club have told him he'll be behind Torres. Don't think it's anything with the wages - perhaps as people have said the agent fees could've also played a hand in it but we'll see.

Doubt it. If we're just looking for someone to back-up Torres* there are many average strikers in the league, Shane Long etc that wouldn't mind coming here.

At the end of this window, i think we will get someone that is capable of starting over Torres.

*This will be really stupid lol, do the people running the transfers even watch games?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt it. If we're just looking for someone to back-up Torres* there are many average strikers in the league, Shane Long etc that wouldn't mind coming here.

At the end of this window, i think we will get someone that is capable of starting over Torres.

*This will be really stupid lol, do the people running the transfers even watch games?!

Lol I agree that it's stupid, but I can imagine that Roman is still trying to see if his Β£50m will work.

Ps. Happy new year to all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any contract with BA should be carefully written. Based on appearance, goals scored..., somehow, I still think 80though a week is too much for him. Agent fees & all that comes up to close to 30m, too much in my way of thinking.

The kid Lukaku should be called upon & certainly Chelsea can guarantee the same amount of play time as WB now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 million for him!!!!

No way!!!

Go sign Loic Remy, that Newcastle were also after and leave BA in Newcastle.

There's so many better players than him, 90k week, double your money, WTF he should take a cut to come here and compete for trophies!!! Definitely NOT CFC material!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly do not understand why BA is sought for.

One does not need to be a manager to see BA is after money here. Is he worth 80thou a week ?

To me, he is not.

I too would rather see an alternative to BA.

Now, I read Chelsea refused to pay BA agents 2m in fees they are demanding.

Chelsea offered standard 5 % of BAΒ΄s contract. Also, less than 70thou a week was offered.

IΒ΄d say, take it or leave it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that's true, what a greedy cunt. I really hope we don't offer him that much. What a dilemma, we need a new striker very quickly and Ba and his agent seem to know that. I hope this is just to make the most out of a fast transfer and his wage demands will decrease as the January draws to a close, because he seemed like the perfect January transfer in contrary to most of the other options that are discussed in the media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...