OneMoSalah 8,889 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Swansea winger Scott Sinclair is refusing to sign a new contract at the Liberty Stadium.The 23-year-old's current deal runs out at the end of the season and he is being linked with a move to Manchester City.The Team GB player has informed Swansea chairman Huw Jenkins of his decision."I have spoken to Scott and he confirmed what he said to the chairman, that he won't sign a new contract," said manager Michael Laudrup."But he is here now and that's what important for me."Laudrup accepts he may lose Sinclair before the transfer window closes at the end of the month."You never know what will happen tomorrow or the day after but there is no point arguing about it, we have to get on with it," said Laudrup. "Until 31 August anything can happen."Of course there is interest from a big club in Scott but the only thing I care about in the short term is that it does not affect him for Saturday."If it affects the player then we have to talk about. I will talk to Scott and if he says no, he does not want to play, then we will see."If he says, 'I'm a professional', then I know he is in the squad."Swansea play Queens Park Rangers at Loftus Road on Saturday.The Swans have also completed the signing of Arsenal's 21-year-old defender Kyle Bartley on a three-year deal.What do yous think? Could/should we resign him ?Clearly has improved since he left us, could be a viable option for the right wing if we don't get Moses. Naturally he plays on the left where I think he has featured prominently for Swansea as a more inside forward kind of winger but I'm sure hes equally adept on the right. Hes scored 35 goals in 90 games for Swansea, which is a goal every 2.5 games basically and for a winger that's not too bad.Have a feeling Brendan Rodgers might move for him as an alternative to Theo Walcott though. Also Shitty are apparently interested.http://www.bbc.co.uk...otball/19292137 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 No. Let him go to City where he would just rot anyway. Sinclair and Rodwell won't improve them too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
francozola 2,040 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I heard that City are going to give Liverpool Adam Johnson as part of the Agger deal and sign Scott Sinclair to replace him. Sounds plausible... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneMoSalah 8,889 Posted August 17, 2012 Author Share Posted August 17, 2012 Really, there going to give Johnson away and take Sinclair? Wtf...... Johnson > Sinclair imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robdog 2,084 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Really, there going to give Johnson away and take Sinclair? Wtf...... Johnson > Sinclair imo.Not in my mind...Sinclair came from the CFC academy, so he has better pedigree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguelito 459 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 i no people have a soft spot for him since he came thru here and they think hes the one that got away ( OT:borini is the one that got away). sinclair is not that good...he is just an average winger, with potential to become better but not great. yes he scored like 20 goals in the championship and then like 8 or somen close to that this season but i think over half were from the pk spot. and anyways, he does nothing special on the field, average in almost every respect. downing type signing imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capriccioso 2,545 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 No, why sign him?He's looked decent at an average team. He'll barely be good enough to be a squad player to be used in the Capital One Cup (fuck that sounds awful) here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneMoSalah 8,889 Posted August 17, 2012 Author Share Posted August 17, 2012 No, why sign him?He's looked decent at an average team. He'll barely be good enough to be a squad player to be used in the Capital One Cup (fuck that sounds awful) here.Capital One Cup LOOOOOOOL is that not the new name of the Carling Cup aye? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capriccioso 2,545 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Capital One Cup LOOOOOOOL is that not the new name of the Carling Cup aye?Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 No thanks. Just an average player and we really need stop overhype or overrate any players that are playing or have played for us. IF Sinclair is really that good as some people seem to have make him to be, he would have been called up to the England squad numerous times already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky 301 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Nahh pass on that, he would be a fool to move to city though (I'm not sure he is), would only be signed to make up the HG rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Hate Scouse 10,332 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 He wouldn't come back anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 We've just got rid of one useless winger, let's not kid ourselves just because Sinclair had an average season in an average side. Take away his pace and he's shite. Really don't rate him, and wouldn't be bothered if he went to one of our rivals. He's no better than what City have. He wouldn't get into the Arsenal side ahead of Walcott and Chamberlain and he wouldn't even make the bench at United. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamjack 8 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Not in my mind...Sinclair came from the CFC academy, so he has better pedigree Hardly came from our academy we signed him when he was 16 from Bristol Rovers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZanSnake 1,211 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 If he stayed, he would have been a squad player and then sold anyway - would laugh if he went to Citeh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedsBlue 1,549 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Too harsh to say that he was shit last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricky 301 Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 I can't believe Sinclair is seriously considering a move to Man City. What's wrong with the lad, his career stalled at Chelsea, and it's sure to do the same at City, I mean where does he fit in (other than adding to the HG rule).Can't see us signing him, in fact I see Newcastle or Liverpool being a more viable option. Hell even Arsenal would make more sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDN Blue 7,903 Posted August 21, 2012 Share Posted August 21, 2012 At least we'll see Johnson reignite his career, at long last. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porthos 35 Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 Chelsea will net a £500,000 bonus when Scott Sinclair finally completes his move to Manchester City this week.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2194332/Chelsea-net-500k-bonus-Scott-Sinclair-Manchester-City.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pizy 18,994 Posted August 28, 2012 Share Posted August 28, 2012 Nice. Roman can use that 500k to gas up the yacht for a quick stop to Madrid to ink a deal for Falcao. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts