Eden Hazard

[DONI. 1,291]

[17. Eden Hazard 30]

Hazard's only intention was to get on with the game and try and get Chelsea into the final.

Ball "boy" was winning time all game long so he went to get the ball himself and when ball boy decided to go and lay on the ball he toe poked-it from underneath him like you can clearly see in the gif below:

That's all there is to it.

The fact some "supporters" on here slate him because of this just to take the moral high ground which the media uses to fill their papers disgust me.

Hazard = LEGEND

[Jype 6,398]

Firstly, I'm not aiming this at the majority (& I would imagine you know who you are, so please feel free to skip my massive raging rant), but having read through most of the posts in this thread today, I am actually absolutely perplexed at the stance some of you have taken regarding this ridiculous fiasco. Maybe I'm the one who's out of touch here, but it does shock me to see some of those who claim to be True Blues condemning one of our own players in such a manner.

.

.

.

.

.

Charlie Morgan - indisputable cunt of the year - scum of the football world.

Post of the month.

I was just discussing this matter with a United supporting friend of mine. He brought up a very good point when he compared the ballboy's actions to those of a pitch invader who is only there to delay the game. If some drunken idiot, against the rules, enters the pitch and starts running around, how many referees would give a red card to a player if he chased the bastard down and somewhat lays his hands on him so that the stewards can come and collect the cunt so that the game can continue as soon as possible? How would that differ from this fiasco? The way I see it that ballboy is just as bad as a drunken pitch invader, both are doing something they're not supposed to do and with their actions are delaying the game. In fact, the ballboy's actions may be considered even worse because it's his job (and his only job) to help the players continue the game without interruptions and his sole intention seemed to be to delay the game as much as possible.

I believe the big deal with this Hazard incident is not the act itself, but the fact this supposed 'victim' is only a 'child'. Personally I don't consider a lad who's old enough to be drinking and driving an expensive car his millionaire dad has bought him a child anymore but hey, that's just me.

[Beirut_Blues 306]

Barton is spot on!

[Jase 43,479]

AFC Wimbledon ‏@AFCWimbledon

We have had the ballboys in early for training today ahead of tonight’s televised match pic.twitter.com/xPEeTUdn

[Milan 17,955]

Lampard's reaction to the sending off...

http://d3fsqtc6sy2z27.cloudfront.net/uploads/7a9623db72a298a2f389441a207ad7b5_large

He took it as a professional, as always anyway with his intelligence. He knows the game.

But imagine Terry being in place of Lamps. I'm pretty sure he would scream and fight for Hazard, which is something he showed on a few occasions.

[Hutcho 8,443]

He took it as a professional, as always anyway with his intelligence. He knows the game.

But imagine Terry being in place of Lamps. I'm pretty sure he would scream and fight for Hazard, which is something he showed on a few occasions.

Yeah, but the point is, no matter what Lamps or JT could say would change the refs red card decision... Lamps took it well and got on with the game as we had to. I'm not saying JT wouldn't have done the same but it wouldn't change much, except the next swansea player with the ball would have got munched by JT!

[Milan 17,955]

Yeah, but the point is, no matter what Lamps or JT could say would change the refs red card decision... Lamps took it well and got on with the game as we had to. I'm not saying JT wouldn't have done the same but it wouldn't change much, except the next swansea player with the ball would have got munched by JT!

I didn't mean they could change the decision, no one can. I am just comparing the two attitudes - while Lampard acts as a pro and takes the decisions, Terry can get really passionate about them.

This is the first thing that came to my mind. Even Carragher had a tough time with JT

[DONI. 1,291]

From 5000 followers to 85.000+

https://twitter.com/CHARLIEM0RGAN

[Jase 43,479]

From 5000 followers to 85.000+

https://twitter.com/CHARLIEM0RGAN

Why is there a smiley face there? Are you conspiring with that pesky kid?!

[DONI. 1,291]

Why is there a smiley face there? Are you conspiring with that pesky kid?!

Ohh no mate,i just put that smiley face beacuse in each tweet that he will post now,he will be offended by everyone

[Jase 43,479]

Ohh no mate,i just put that smiley face beacuse in each tweet that he will post now,he will be offended by everyone

Of course. Of course...

[joshmercury 20]

Atleast he will get some much needed rest . If I am not mistaken Hazard has pretty much played in every 1 of our games, he needs rest and has got one

[Jase 43,479]

Atleast he will get some much needed rest . If I am not mistaken Hazard has pretty much played in every 1 of our games, he needs rest and has got one

True but with the lack of options at the moment, we really could do with him available for us. And yes, Hazard has played in every game for us this season, the only player in the team to have done so.

[Pacquiao 1,834]

From 5000 followers to 85.000+

https://twitter.com/CHARLIEM0RGAN

did he really have 5000 followers before the incident happened?