Eden Hazard

[mediator 2,026]

Just LOL

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pray-for-Charlie-Morgan/238740266260997

[super_frank8 186]

Firstly, I'm not aiming this at the majority (& I would imagine you know who you are, so please feel free to skip my massive raging rant), but having read through most of the posts in this thread today, I am actually absolutely perplexed at the stance some of you have taken regarding this ridiculous fiasco. Maybe I'm the one who's out of touch here, but it does shock me to see some of those who claim to be True Blues condemning one of our own players in such a manner.

If you're honestly going to tell me that, as a first team Chelsea player who has been running himself dogged for 80 minutes in a pivotal semi-final tie, you wouldn't have done exactly the same thing when faced with this complete & utter delinquent fuckwit who has just decided to flop to the floor like a mentally-incapacitated seal in an attempt to shield the ball nestled under his stomach - when you are clearly trying to get on with the game, thus what is essentially an opposition supporter obstructing your ability to continue your actual job - then you are either being entirely senile, or unbelievably naive.

Or maybe you just prefer lounging around in denial & lying to yourself since it makes you feel like 'a better person' for not wanting to curb-stomp that wanker's skull on a pitchside billboard. Obviously I would never actually do that, but I think you get the point.

Sure, for all of those that still believe in world peace & other such idealistic delusions - Hazard could have handled it differently if he had just waited around complaining, protesting & waving at officials, as would seem to be the obvious rational reaction for all of you 'morally superior' individuals. In fact, he probably should have just rolled a nice little joint & chilled out by the corner flag while he patiently waited for things to resolve themselves in due time; that would have been the sensible thing to do.

But considering the fact that the little wankstain initially let the ball roll straight past his feet before moving with all of the swiftness & swagger of a debilitated sloth, still refusing to give the ball to him amicably despite being less than an arm's length away, & then deciding to collapse to the ground in some desperately pathetic last-ditch attempt at succeeding in his pre-meditated goal of time-wasting - even then being completely adamant in protecting his 'precious' with Hazard trying to calmly reach under him to grasp it from his cretinous clutches - well then I don't see how there was any other option than to retrieve the ball by outwitting his feeble-minded fellow; which involved nothing more than simply poking the ball out from underneath him as anyone with basic football skills would do themselves.

But then shit hit the fan. Purely because the little fucker had the nerve to act as if there was actual significant force & contact behind all of a 35cm back-lift from Hazard's right boot, through an extensively padded winter jacket, before suddenly sitting up & mouthing off to let the Swansea players & the officials know he was in some kind of (un)imaginable agony; only to fall to the ground seconds later clutching his ribs once more, covered in crocodile tears, forever solidifying his universal reputation as an insipid putrid graceless virgin twat.

If you somehow still choose to vagrantly defy all logical reasoning & feel Hazard was in the wrong for trying to nick the ball off a 17-year-old in exactly the same way he would do with any opposition player of similar age in a similar situation on the field, or even with a teammate in training - then you are just as much of a massive saggy flapping vagina as that podgy piece of shit is.

That mug is an absolute disgrace to the game in every sense - & if you believe Hazard should actually be held responsible for what was an entirely transparent contrived act from an opposition supporter who clearly attempted to influence a top flight match through such a spectacularly retarded performance & display of appallingly desititute ethics & integrity, managing to not only complete his covert mission, but consequently quite possibly fuck up the rest of our club's season by deceiving the referee in the same manner that the likes of Suarez & Bale are constantly being abused for every week - well then so are you in my books.

When even your own rival supporters are recognising & voicing their disgust & contempt for such a despicable act that has defiled the integrity of modern day football itself (as if that doesn't happen often enough already as it is) - I am quite simply dumbfounded to find those whom the injustice has been committed against somehow being able to dismiss it with actual remorse for this supposed 'victim'.

Unfortunately, the individual that you seem to be condemning as the perpetrator - happens to be the one you should be vindicating in all reality. This fucking cunt is now the talk of the entire globe. Literally world famous overnight. An arbitrary achievement that is evidently worth tarnishing the reputation of one of the most promising & exciting young stars to have graced British soil in years; with nothing but implicit deceit & baby fat on his side.

If you actually take a step back & look at all of the evidence - the only real victim here, in the midst of this cataclysmic ridiculousness - is Eden Hazard.

& I honestly could not feel more sorry for the poor guy, because as far as I am concerned, he has done absolutely nothing wrong in my eyes - if anything - showing far more commitment to the cause than the majority of our team seemed to be last night.

The fact is that if it was me, as a Chelsea fan, & as a general indication as to where my own beliefs in such astonishing injustices lie - I would have actually given that wanker something to cry about. & then some.

Charlie Morgan - indisputable cunt of the year - scum of the football world.

[cousin benson 76]

Just LOL

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Pray-for-Charlie-Morgan/238740266260997

Haha, GOOD hope the little shite gets ripped for this...

[kellzfresh 7,229]

Well if i see it again time after time, it is sooooo clear he kicks the ball (not even too hard) from under the ball boys body, leapes over and fetches the ball. There is no intent whatsoever to hurt or even kick the kid itself.

We are jumping on a moral bandwagon here.

There is nothing there, no intent, no 'felony'. Fact. Just a player in a damn hurry to get the ball back.

That's all there is to it. It will be used against us, that's true. Fans should stick with Hazard considering the facts and not go into the moral, misplaced highground here. No reason to betray on of pur own players. Just see the footage again.

Ps: Once more: if you think he actually kicked the 17 year old ball boy, look again closely, really. He hits the ball with his tip of the boot and it jumps from under the guys body.

This^

Hazard kicked the ball, the boy faked it and rolled like a baby. So if ball boys are allowed to jump on the ball now, we probably will need an extra 10mins of added time for ball boys grabbing all throwings and goal kicks. WTF

[different level 1,056]

Well, what's done is done. Now we can just wait and find out if Haz gets something more than the usual 3 match suspension. Deep down I still have my hopes that after watching the footage and acknowledging the ballboy's actions, Eden will have his red card rescinded, but I'm almost certain that's not going to happen.

[YouNameIt 1,511]

Well, what's done is done. Now we can just wait and find out if Haz gets something more than the usual 3 match suspension. Deep down I still have my hopes that after watching the footage and acknowledging the ballboy's actions, Eden will have his red card rescinded, but I'm almost certain that's not going to happen.

He wont, since he's a chelsea player.

[Gorando 184]

no big deal

[Hamilton 2,120]

Indeed, and SAF was allready all over the FA when they dropped Kompany's red from Arsenal game..

[The Skipper 20,593]

Still don't understand how anyone could think what Hazard did was "reckless". Here's the definition of the word:

adjective

heedless of danger or the consequences of ones actions; rash or impetuous:

What Hazard did wasn't heedless, rash or impetuous. It's what anyone would've done. What he did wasn't stupid at all IMO.

If we had SAF or Mourinho as manager they would be livid with the ref.

[DONI. 1,291]

[17. Eden Hazard 30]

Hazard's only intention was to get on with the game and try and get Chelsea into the final.

Ball "boy" was winning time all game long so he went to get the ball himself and when ball boy decided to go and lay on the ball he toe poked-it from underneath him like you can clearly see in the gif below:

That's all there is to it.

The fact some "supporters" on here slate him because of this just to take the moral high ground which the media uses to fill their papers disgust me.

Hazard = LEGEND

[Jype 6,398]

Firstly, I'm not aiming this at the majority (& I would imagine you know who you are, so please feel free to skip my massive raging rant), but having read through most of the posts in this thread today, I am actually absolutely perplexed at the stance some of you have taken regarding this ridiculous fiasco. Maybe I'm the one who's out of touch here, but it does shock me to see some of those who claim to be True Blues condemning one of our own players in such a manner.

.

.

.

.

.

Charlie Morgan - indisputable cunt of the year - scum of the football world.

Post of the month.

I was just discussing this matter with a United supporting friend of mine. He brought up a very good point when he compared the ballboy's actions to those of a pitch invader who is only there to delay the game. If some drunken idiot, against the rules, enters the pitch and starts running around, how many referees would give a red card to a player if he chased the bastard down and somewhat lays his hands on him so that the stewards can come and collect the cunt so that the game can continue as soon as possible? How would that differ from this fiasco? The way I see it that ballboy is just as bad as a drunken pitch invader, both are doing something they're not supposed to do and with their actions are delaying the game. In fact, the ballboy's actions may be considered even worse because it's his job (and his only job) to help the players continue the game without interruptions and his sole intention seemed to be to delay the game as much as possible.

I believe the big deal with this Hazard incident is not the act itself, but the fact this supposed 'victim' is only a 'child'. Personally I don't consider a lad who's old enough to be drinking and driving an expensive car his millionaire dad has bought him a child anymore but hey, that's just me.

[Beirut_Blues 306]

Barton is spot on!

[Jase 43,479]

AFC Wimbledon ‏@AFCWimbledon

We have had the ballboys in early for training today ahead of tonight’s televised match pic.twitter.com/xPEeTUdn

[Milan 17,859]

Lampard's reaction to the sending off...

http://d3fsqtc6sy2z27.cloudfront.net/uploads/7a9623db72a298a2f389441a207ad7b5_large

He took it as a professional, as always anyway with his intelligence. He knows the game.

But imagine Terry being in place of Lamps. I'm pretty sure he would scream and fight for Hazard, which is something he showed on a few occasions.

[Hutcho 8,443]

He took it as a professional, as always anyway with his intelligence. He knows the game.

But imagine Terry being in place of Lamps. I'm pretty sure he would scream and fight for Hazard, which is something he showed on a few occasions.

Yeah, but the point is, no matter what Lamps or JT could say would change the refs red card decision... Lamps took it well and got on with the game as we had to. I'm not saying JT wouldn't have done the same but it wouldn't change much, except the next swansea player with the ball would have got munched by JT!

[Milan 17,859]

Yeah, but the point is, no matter what Lamps or JT could say would change the refs red card decision... Lamps took it well and got on with the game as we had to. I'm not saying JT wouldn't have done the same but it wouldn't change much, except the next swansea player with the ball would have got munched by JT!

I didn't mean they could change the decision, no one can. I am just comparing the two attitudes - while Lampard acts as a pro and takes the decisions, Terry can get really passionate about them.

This is the first thing that came to my mind. Even Carragher had a tough time with JT

[DONI. 1,291]

From 5000 followers to 85.000+

https://twitter.com/CHARLIEM0RGAN