Eden Hazard

[Jase 43,174]

 

[Tautvix 1,321]

Unfortunately, it's now quite clear that Hazard is off to Madrid.

Was a real pleasure to have him here at Chelsea and EPL.

Not sure if we will ever have a player of his quality ever again at Chelsea. 

[LAM09 5,806]

Unfortunately, it's now quite clear that Hazard is off to Madrid.
Was a real pleasure to have him here at Chelsea and EPL.
Not sure if we will ever have a player of his quality ever again at Chelsea. [emoji20]

If the ban doesn't get overturned, I can see him seeing out his contract.

What is £100m~ when you can't do anything with it for 12 months?

[MrExcalibur100 7,089]

14 minutes ago, killer1257 said:

He had a lot of god like performances. Chelsea fans just do forget how many times he had those. In Mou´s second season and first Conte season, he always played like that. He is just the greatest Chelsea player of all time. He ist he closest thing to Messi and Ronaldo out there

The only ones I;ve seen that can match that are Everton at home and Sunderland away. I put this in his top 3 for sure and it has a valid argument for top 1. Just in terms of level of performance.

[Fulham Broadway 14,917]

It wouldn't matter. him fucking off, if we had the calibre of other players in previous seasons. Kovacic and Jorginho never score let alone make assists whereas in the past we could rely on a regular 20 goals a season from one midfielder, Lampard. 

[Jase 43,174]

 

[nyikolajevics 2,092]

2 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

If the ban doesn't get overturned, I can see him seeing out his contract.

What is £100m~ when you can't do anything with it for 12 months?

Mm, maybe keep the 100M pounds and spend it next year?

No fucking way this happens. We will either make him sign a new contract or sell him. 100 million is too much money, we won't throw it away in the window.

[LAM09 5,806]

Mm, maybe keep the 100M pounds and spend it next year? No fucking way this happens. We will either make him sign a new contract or sell him. 100 million is too much money, we won't throw it away in the window.

 

Just look at the stats above. There's no chance someone steps up with similar numbers, so we don't know what predicament we'll be in next season. 

 

 

Struggling to finish 4th WITH him.

 

 

 

[nyikolajevics 2,092]

Just now, LAM09 said:

Just look at the stats above. There's no chance someone steps up with similar numbers, so we don't know what predicament we'll be in next season.

 

Struggling to finish 4th WITH him.

 

 

Yeah, it will be tough withouth him, no doubt in that, but for 100M pounds we can buy a long term replacement of him or we can spend it on our weak points - LB, striker.

If this break up must happen then we better get that money for him. The club is run by businessmen I am sure we won't let him go for free.

 

 

[Fulham Broadway 14,917]

Carragher criticizing Sarri for saying it's Hazards decision.

Hard to respect the views of someone who gobbed a big green'un in a fourteen year old girls face

[LAM09 5,806]

 

Yeah, it will be tough withouth him, no doubt in that, but for 100M pounds we can buy a long term replacement of him or we can spend it on our weak points - LB, striker.

If this break up must happen then we better get that money for him. The club is run by businessmen I am sure we won't let him go for free.

 

 

He could do us a favour and renew, with an agreement in place. I'm all for the inevitable, but it has to suit both parties.

 

Not to mentioned RM's current situation.

[Jase 43,174]

11 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

If the ban doesn't get overturned, I can see him seeing out his contract.

What is £100m~ when you can't do anything with it for 12 months?

 

8 minutes ago, nyikolajevics said:

Mm, maybe keep the 100M pounds and spend it next year?

No fucking way this happens. We will either make him sign a new contract or sell him. 100 million is too much money, we won't throw it away in the window.

I know 100 million is a lot but there is no guarantee we will spend wisely with that money as seen with buying Drinkwater, Bakayoko, Zappacosta etc.

[LAM09 5,806]

I know 100 million is a lot but there is no guarantee we will spend wisely with that money as seen with buying Drinkwater, Bakayoko, Zappacosta etc.

Exactly. How much has been blown of an American youngster?

[nyikolajevics 2,092]

Just now, Jason said:

 

I know 100 million is a lot but there is no guarantee we will spend wisely with that money as seen with buying Drinkwater, Bakayoko, Zappacosta etc.

Of course there isn't. But still it's more likely than substitute Hazard from 0 pounds.  We have many old players - Giroud, Pedro, Willian, David Luiz. They will leave soon and we won't recieve too much money for them, so we'll need that Hazard money.

[the wes 7,212]

2 minutes ago, Jason said:

 

I know 100 million is a lot but there is no guarantee we will spend wisely with that money as seen with buying Drinkwater, Bakayoko, Zappacosta etc.

This why we need to bring in a DOF to stop us from making bad signings 

[Jase 43,174]

10 minutes ago, LAM09 said:

11 minutes ago, Jason said:

I know 100 million is a lot but there is no guarantee we will spend wisely with that money as seen with buying Drinkwater, Bakayoko, Zappacosta etc.

Exactly. How much has been blown of an American youngster?

I shall refrain myself from responding to that... 

[the wes 7,212]

 

[Superblue_1986 4,789]

Phenomenal tonight and hopefully he's picking up and hitting some key form at a crucial part of the season.

If we lose him next season with a transfer ban it'll be a rough year as we're limited to what we can do.

However even with a transfer window in the summer, I've said previously it's foolish for the club to think we can go out and replace him because we can't. There isn't another player available capable of the creativity that he provides. If we have to sell we need to invest the money in other areas of the squad the same way Liverpool did when they sold Coutinho (specifically buying Van Dijk and Alisson). We need two new full backs and a striker, that's where the Hazard money should go towards investing.

A 20 goal striker would mean we're not looking for one of our wide players to put up similar numbers, and two full backs capable of getting up and down the pitch will provide more width and create more chances than our current full backs at present. It's a case of trying to share out some of the workload that Hazard currently does for the team on his own, rather than expecting to bring someone in who will take up that mantle.

[!Hazard! 3,393]

I'm already prepared and ready to accept that he's gonna leave but surely we're not gonna sell the third best player in the world for only £85m? 

[the wes 7,212]