Jump to content

Eden Hazard


the wes
 Share

Recommended Posts

City seem to have a plan. Anyone that really shits on them when they play, they plan on buying. And then there is all the other good players in the world... whom they also plan to buy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want to state that I have nothing against Hazard, even if he goes to City. As you probably see, I'm a real Hazard fan. But you got to be a bit concerned, we should easily get him more thoughtful of wich club to go for, and this is our own fault. If we want to come closer to the league title next season, we have to get a good upcoming player.. but mark my words, it could be anyone, not just Hazard. Belhanda would be a great signing too.. and wouldn't cost as much thought. :halo:

Would love if Hazard just made a U-turn and said; "Manchester? I've never said anything about Manchester.. Chelsea it is", haha :D

It's pretty obvious that ManCity need more Attacking Midfielders and Strikers. I can't name one in there current squad.

I hope that was ironic. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty obvious that ManCity need more Attacking Midfielders and Strikers. I can't name one in there current squad.

You cant name attacking midfielders for City? Nasri and Silva....

Still ridiculous though we are apparently really interested in a player then City decide to fucking go and try sign him (Robinho, Hazard, Silva and Giovonco (if they sign him) despite him being very average) suppose we have done the same before though but since its City they can go do one, the cunts .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I think Hazard will come to City, there is already one Belgian in the squad in Vincent [Kompany]. He's a young, talented player and at Manchester United there are a lot of people on the wings." Nasri said.

"I was in the same position last year and I chose City, and I don't regret my choice."

Ok so he says he's going Manchester. What can United offer him? They have Nani, Valencia, Young and probably Kawaga. City's midfield is saturated with talent, Silva, Nasri, Johnson, Milner. Nasri has said he preferred to play in the middle too. However, with Mancini and his extremely defensive tendancies I don't understand why he seems to have chosen a Manchester club. He probably can be better than most of them, but a transition isn't that easy too make. Many times we've seen talents go waste - like Quaresma. Choosing City would be a huge gamble. I actually think out of the two, despite the fact that United have some top wingers he would have a greater impact at United over City. Fergie's done it with Ronaldo and it would be a dangerous prospect to put him in such experienced hands. Mancini on the other hand, I'm not so sure - he hasn't handled Johnson well, and Balotelli imo could've done what he did without him their. (No matter what the media say). Still with all this said, and the shattering statement he made the other day I do think we have an opportunity.

"The priority for Eden is one thing: games, opportunities,It might be better to join a club just below the biggest." - Eden Hazard's Dad said a while ago.

With such risky circumstances I think Chelsea have an opportunity, but it all rests on one thing - Champions League football next season. He has said the right things, and when you break it down a move to City isn't as crazy as you'd think - risky, but since he is clearly better than nearly all of them it's not crazy. Arsenal would be a great choice, but money pretty much rules them out - not to mention salvation in the Ox and some other youngsters like Miyachi. He made his intent to join Manchester clear when he was at a big event, and the news were flooded with Manchester this Manchester that. Contrary to what I first thought he does seem to enjoy flattering himself (by opening himself to all clubs for example), despite his generally great character on and off the pitch. If we do win I would not be surprised at all if he says London is an option, so my message to the board would be clear, keep on pressing. A Champions league victory would be immense for so many reasons and with our quite embarrassing wing-play/attacking midfielding options, logic may just open a gate to the Bridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You cant name attacking midfielders for City? Nasri and Silva....

Still ridiculous though we are apparently really interested in a player then City decide to fucking go and try sign him (Robinho, Hazard, Silva and Giovonco (if they sign him) despite him being very average) suppose we have done the same before though but since its City they can go do one, the cunts .

The cunts.

It was a joke, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would laugh my nuts off all this transfer talk was an elaborate scheme by Hazard and his agent to get a better contract at Lille. Doubtful, but it would still be pretty damn funny.

Don't think so. He's coming to England either United or City.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You